Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
more like looking for consent for a three wayI find the timing of this discussion to be a bit premature.
Like looking for a new wife while you're still living with and married to your current one.
Seems strange no one has tried to pry one loose. Long term contracts maybe? For some reason Gws always seems to be the subject of raids and GC goes overlooked.
Hey KM we havent heard anything from this bloke sense draft day have we that everybody liked pre-draft a wile ago http://www.portadelaidefc.com.au/player-profile/mason-shaw*I'm not familiar with the contact situations.
But the three can probably co-exist. It really depends on how Gold Coast want to use them all.
It could pretty easily work out as Dixon as the deep forward, Lynch as more the athletic forward who can lead higher up the field and Day the relief ruck who would play most of his minutes presumably forward.
Dixon as a Queenslander is someone where I don't think he really would necessarily have that much interest in leaving unless he wasn't getting a game.
Lynch is their franchise key forward and arguably after Ablett their second best player. So he is one a lot of clubs would love to have, but it would take him to request a trade back to Victoria as a Victorian for that to really happen as he would be no doubt a priority for GC to retain.
Then Day is a South Australian so that's probably more where he would look to move if anywhere, and probably for opportunity or family reasons that could plausibly come about.
Though I haven't really with any of them got the sense they want to move, with no real big rumours of interest in moving from any of them with GC a club where players get there, and seem pretty happy to stay.
What may in time change that key forward situation is their recent top draft pick in Peter Wright who was taken at 8 overall. Wright is capable both as a key forward and a ruckman, so once he develops, that might be more when someone of you could call it this four, could realistically become available.
Then similar story with their ruck situation. If say Peter Wright becomes that key forward who can relieve in the ruck, probably a Tom Nicholls or Zac Smith could become available for clubs looking for a ruckman. And Nicholls as the Victorian rather than Smith who is the Queenslander of the two probably is the one more likely to go.
So they'll be the rough storylines with those tall forwards/rucks to follow in Gold Coast's situation.
Hey KM we havent heard anything from this bloke sense draft day have we that everybody liked pre-draft a wile ago http://www.portadelaidefc.com.au/player-profile/mason-shaw
Serious? Prestia is an absolute gun. I'd have him in our squad over pretty much anybody except Pendles, Sidebottom, Swan, Reid and Cloke.Do we need another Midget?
Serious? Prestia is an absolute gun. I'd have him in our squad over pretty much anybody except Pendles, Sidebottom, Swan, Reid and Cloke.
Height is a great attribute but when you have the skill set he does and the ability to execute on game day you are already on the up.
In a heartbeat, TDWell then we need to get Rid of Blair and Dwyer
I find the timing of this discussion to be a bit premature.
Like looking for a new wife while you're still living with and married to your current one.
Speculative developing tall at this stage. Year 1 played a mix of reserves/league footy in SA. Year 2 played exclusively league footy. So he is progressing and he has gone from in season one just managing the 5 goals from 7 games as opposed to in season 2 where he managed a better 25 goals from 14 games.
Big forward obviously, can also push up the ground some. Still has a fair way to go. But this year will tell us more about him. It will give us a better indication of how quickly his development (ongoing) is going for him and based on that, those extra years of data will make it easier to project who he can be.
At this stage until he convinces me he hasn't. So he is more someone I'm aware of, without having such an interest that I'll look at his numbers from week to week or watch for him in those SANFL games I see him play this year. But being so early in his career and showing in his first two seasons improvement, you can't completely dismiss him at the same time.
It's a pretty straight forward system:Given this is the trade talk what are we willing to give up?
The only two players GWS would probably want are Witts and Reid, their midfield is stacked with both inside and outside players, small forward/midfielders are also good on after this years draft. Maybe Adam Oxley but he won't fetch us a Treloar, Shiel or WHE. Cox looks like he can't lose a hitout, if he picks the game up okay at VFL I wouldn't mind trading Witts.
To a Port or the Crows Broomhead, Kennedy and Scharenberg are most likely what those clubs are going to be into. Given their ruck stocks are fine Grundy wouldn't be that valuable. Port with Lobbe and Ryder and Adelaide with Jacobs being more of a solo ruck, can't seeing them spend big on a back up ruckman at best for them short/medium term. Can't see Grundy wanting to do that either.
West Coast and Fremantle, does anyone ever deal with them?
Brisbane, maybe a three way deal getting Aish to Adelaide. Considering how Brisbane upgraded their midfield (without going into too much detail) and how Gold Coast already had a strong a strong midfield and added Mitch Hallahan Josh Thomas would not have any value even if he wasn't suspended. Keeffe would have had value as classy key defenders are always useful. Considering Brisbane's unprofessional approach last year and the fact our chips are now probably gone we'll probably won't get a deal done here. Adam Oxley have some value to Brisbane but GC have a fair share of tall classy half back flankers.
Fasolo to freo dunno who for though
Yeah, he can play for Peel on the forward flank next to Collin Silvia's!
Fasolo is way better then Sylvia
Given this is the trade talk what are we willing to give up?
Any picks that are required.
In terms of players any players not named: Pendlebury, Elliott, Sidebottom, Cloke, Grundy, Witts, Moore, De Goey, Reid, Broomhead, Scharenberg, Freeman and Swan.
Otherwise no others would be off limits, or no others should be off limits. Just some players you'd prefer not to trade/players who would be of more value to us than the next team.
Any picks that are required.
In terms of players any players not named: Pendlebury, Elliott, Sidebottom, Cloke, Grundy, Witts, Moore, De Goey, Reid, Broomhead, Scharenberg, Freeman and Swan.
Otherwise no others would be off limits, or no others should be off limits. Just some players you'd prefer not to trade/players who would be of more value to us than the next team.
No One would want Swan. As he be too old