Did Richmond get the best midfield boost ever? (in last years draft)

Remove this Banner Ad

richcogs

Premiership Player
Oct 8, 2004
4,908
2,529
Wodonga
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Pittsburgh Penguins
Did Richmond get the best midfield boost ever? (in last years draft)
I mean 4 midfielders in the top 20. Has a team ever bettered their midfield in a draft before?
 
richcogs said:
Did Richmond get the best midfield boost ever? (in last years draft)
I mean 4 midfielders in the top 20. Has a team ever bettered their midfield in a draft before?

Calm down mate.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

OneEyedHawk said:
She's got a point Bentleigh. Considering only 1 player has done anything yet to even get remotely excited about.

Anyway, they should have been KPP's. :D

How many players have great first years :confused:

Polo & Meyer have been quailty in the 2's, both are showing very pleasing signs.

they should not have been KPP's, quailty mids are exactly what was needed.
 
Getting Ball and Dal Santo in the one draft is pretty handy.

Also Clarke and Montagna, neither are really pure midfielders though.

They also got Heath Black via trades that year.
 
Longy413 said:
Getting Ball and Dal Santo in the one draft is pretty handy.

Also Clarke and Montagna, neither are really pure midfielders though.

They also got Heath Black via trades that year.
There's your winner.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

cypher said:
Brownlow medallist in his third year makes him a champion unlike Wayne Campbell

Then Jordan Russell will be > Deledio, but Walker will be >Tambling

Clutching at straws kid.
 
MVFC__ said:
Clutching at straws kid.
No, it was as ridiculous as your suggestion that Judd isn't better than Hodge and Ball.And your posts and threads are the work of a child and Meyer and Polo are unproven as Russell and Hartlett.
Richmond "supporters" have bought into Wallace's crap that he can turn around a club when he was pretty poor with trading and drafting at the Dogs.Exactly like giving Rubbertits Simmonds a five year deal and not drafting Franklin!
 
cypher said:
No, it was as ridiculous as your suggestion that Judd isn't better than Hodge and Ball.

Much of the football world now rates Hodge and Ball equal (if not better) to Judd. As good as Judd is the other 2 blokes are also elite.

And your posts and threads are the work of a child and Meyer and Polo are unproven as Russell and Hartlett.

Meyer and Polo were taken at 12 & 20.

That doesnt mean they will good but the abilty is there.

Richmond "supporters" have bought into Wallace's crap that he can turn around a club when he was pretty poor with trading and drafting at the Dogs.Exactly like giving Rubbertits Simmonds a five year deal and not drafting Franklin!

Richmond drafting and trading has been sensational. Top class. :cool:
 
cypher said:
Then Jordan Russell will be > Deledio, but Walker will be >Tambling


and then you wake up and instead Of Cindy Crawford sleeping next to you, you find a fat hairy woman with short hair , welcome back to reality Cypher. :)


and No, that fat hairy woman with short hair is not my mother. ;)
 
metallichris said:
Hodge + Ball > Judd

Judd > Hodge

Judd > Ball

Hodge = Ball

In my opinion. Still too early in Hodge and Ball's career to cancel one out from the other. Judd has a Brownlow in the closet already.


good form chris, I agree. :)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top