- May 15, 2006
- 19,595
- 19,977
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- The Cobblers who do the Cobbling
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe Brendan would like to answer whether he would deem it 'unethical' to sell expensive watches to his Saints teammates, when he was given them as a gift?
The Thursday night of the 1984 2nd Semi Final. That clown Sheedy and that prick Egan reported the Hawks to the drug squad who were at Hawthorn's door upsetting practice and their preparation for the finals. Sheedy and Egan reported that the Hawks were inhaling an illegal substance which was in fact a mixture of smelling salts and honey to clear the head after a knock. Guess what? We even had records to prove it.
A real cheap stunt from a cheap football club that will stop at nothing to achieve success. Ironic that 30 years down the track, these "moral watchdogs" are in genuine strife for use of illegal substances. And Goddard says OTHER clubs are unethical. What .... A ..... JOKE.
The Thursday night of the 1984 2nd Semi Final. That clown Sheedy and that prick Egan reported the Hawks to the drug squad who were at Hawthorn's door upsetting practice and their preparation for the finals. Sheedy and Egan reported that the Hawks were inhaling an illegal substance which was in fact a mixture of smelling salts and honey to clear the head after a knock. Guess what? We even had records to prove it.
A real cheap stunt from a cheap football club that will stop at nothing to achieve success. Ironic that 30 years down the track, these "moral watchdogs" are in genuine strife for use of illegal substances. And Goddard says OTHER clubs are unethical. What .... A ..... JOKE.
Why would clubs have been paying players under the table prior to the introduction of the salary cap in 1987?So they were all payed under the table like the players at Coll and Carl?
What's done is done can't change what happened im sure in hindsight the club wouldn't put it's self in this situation.
It is unethical.
I can understand a player mabey wanting out but to actually have rival clubs dangle lots of $$$ and telling that player to use the drug get out clause is disrespectful especially if that player is happy and want's to go no where.
Why would clubs have been paying players under the table prior to the introduction of the salary cap in 1987?
No doubt your post is based on something a relative or friend might have told you somewhere along the line & you just took it as gospel. Take it from me, people from past generations were as much prone to lying as our most recent generations.
It didn't happen. It didn't need to happen.
It was the likes of Geelong, St Kilda, Melbourne & North Melbourne who started the splashing around of money in the '60s & '70s, other clubs then followed suit (if you look at the Carlton premiership sides of 1968, 1970, 1972 & 1979 you will see a predominance of players from our country & suburban zones whilst the likes of Crosswell, Jones & Jesaulenko were unknown players from Tassie & the ACT respectively).Over the journey "under the table or not" I've no doubt Coll & Carl have had significantly deeper pockets than Ess to attract the best players from across the country.
So they were all payed under the table like the players at Coll and Carl?