Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nous or ability to work out how…. 2 separate things.Does anyone have the nous to link it so we can all have a look?
It's the core/trunk where he'll need to gain strength if he wants to take on the gorillas. Arms are all well and good but the thing that they're attached to is more important.
We...We dont have a supplements program, right...?
Does anyone have the nous to link it so we can all have a look?
I predict Cloke pissing himself come round 1...Always looked like he had a frame that could hold a bit of bulk.
I actually think that most Bandwagon's would need two leaders of sorts. There would need to be the driver of the Wagon itself but also the Band Leader. ONe is responsible for ensuring that the bandwagon keeps moving in the right direction the other for ensuring the music eminating from it is suitably inspiring and jovial. I will leave it to knaf and TheBrownDog to allocate these roles between themselves.
Err...why not just have a pilot and co-pilot in honour of Clarke himself?
Clarke looking strong, think he is one of the best young key defenders in the game. Looking forward to watching his development, is it likely he and McStay will be your 1-2 key defenders with Cutler third? Where does Gardiner fit in?
Andrews appears to be in line for the second tall defender, I think hes seen as the more suited to match the agile ones. Clarke will take the gorillas. Darcy will be the third/Patfulls replacement and McStay could end up being a forward. Cutler would be a back flanker, but may end up being depth more than anything.
Thanks
So Clarke would be played closer to goal? What is his aerobic capacity like anyway? I've watched a fair bit of him but it's hard to get a read on these type of things just from watching games. A guy like Trav Cloke, who has years of pre-seasons under his belt, might be matched for size by Clarke but can still move around the ground.
What type of forward would McStay be then? I'd assume Freeman would be the first choice to develop up forward, and then Close 2nd. Assuming you play 2 of Leuenberger, Martin and West, then one will be a resting forward at times.
Interesting times ahead for Brisbane in the KP stocks, good problems to have though! Will lift competition for spots.
I see Clarke more the FB and Andrews the CHB myself. As for McStay, I would have him a third tall that can swing forward/back, sort of like what Staker does for us when hes playing. Or we could keep him there like a Gunston type. Freeman and Close, at this stage, are going to be our FF/CHFs for the foreseeable future, dependant on trades next season of course.
Burger+Martin would be our preferred ruck combo, so we could even have McStay swing back when one of them are resting forward and if one goes to the bench he heads forward of the ball for the extra target. Hes shown he has good hands and a keen goal sense.
It is not publicly available but intercept marks is a good one. Modern day defenders are expected to win the footy back and not just negate.What stats help a "new" AFL follower determine a good defender? Especially for the sides in the bottom of the ladder e.g. Brisbane Lions. The stats of 1% is the only stat that I can see that relates to a defender.
It is not publicly available but intercept marks is a good one. Modern day defenders are expected to win the footy back and not just negate.
Clubs record contests won, lost and drawn which would be interesting to track. Reckon Clarke has a very small number of contests lost given the amount of times the ball enters our defensive zone.
Intercept marks stat is now available in the herald sun isn't it?