- Oct 30, 2010
- 5,547
- 4,365
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
billionaires/trillionaires made what we have. Not the people as they pretend they did.
who are the trillionaires exactly?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
billionaires/trillionaires made what we have. Not the people as they pretend they did.
147 companies have control of 40 percent of he worlds wealth. These companies are ran by the same families. Do the sums. And around 1200 companies own 80 percent of he worlds wealth. Again do the sums.who are the trillionaires exactly?
Oh right, you're trolling. Carry on thenbillionaires/trillionaires made what we have. Not the people as they pretend they did.
Not illuminati. It's fact. Massimo family for example. Study the Vatican families.Yeah ok mate. Cool illuminati theory you got there.
147 companies have control of 40 percent of he worlds wealth. These companies are ran by the same families. Do the sums. And around 1200 companies own 80 percent of he worlds wealth. Again do the sums.
But, you are the joke.
Or are you saying we dont live in a pyramid society that has its wealth a fair bit out of balance?
Yes. Do you take every expression literally?
yeah, getting 2 degrees, multiple properties, good jobs. i sure showed my parents lol!
your reading comprehension is way off (shocked i tell you!). at no stage whatsoever have i said i was a "conspiracy nut". i'm far, far too smart and well-educated to fall for the nonsense swallowed by some people here. but yes, i love a good bit of reefer!
because you ask me to (plus, i've been cyberstalked before by a nutjob who wanted to sue me for mocking his idiotic opinions on a forum. why make it easier?
Let me guess
strategy
Ha no, this was on another forum. Total nutcase who was all about the govt taking our freedoms, but wanted to sue me for correcting his nonsense!
Please do share your understanding of the wealth distribution at the top of the pyramid then?
No, i want specifics. Name "the rich".