Official thread for speculation, news and confirmed trades.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Carlton v Melbourne - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Demons at 59% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Originally posted by Ching
Official speculation?
Originally posted by OldSchool
Mal Micheal looks like he could be leaving the Lions. If only we could get him
As I said to you before Stevens is a fantastic player and would improve our side but outside running midielders are a dime a dozen at the doggies.Would prefer to pay that sort of amount to someone who will fix some of our problems.Michael you could build your backline around!Originally posted by The Doctor
You would think he would be a priority recruiting target. Imagine him holding down FB for the next 5-6 years.
Steven? I wonder why. Surely it would only be in a pre-season draft scenario. Would we really want to trade for him?
Originally posted by OldSchool
Mal Micheal looks like he could be leaving the Lions. If only we could get him
Originally posted by localyokel
We nearly did a few years ago.
Originally posted by OldSchool
You would have to think that if by some miracle we did land him that he and Grant would be an awesome backline.
Where would that leave Croft and Harris ?
Perhaps Croft as the FF and Harris as the 3rd defensive tall
Has to be a concern when you already have Darcy,Bandy and Skipper in the side.I think Darcy is not a strong mark in the jumping over packs and sitting on blokes heads sort of style but one on one he is more than a 50/50 bet each time IMO.Just pushes people aside like there nothingOriginally posted by OldSchool
Doc, Surely the plan must be to use Peter Street for 10 minutes each Q and either give Darcy the occasional spell on the bench or more likely to move him forward as a marking option although his history would say that he is not a strong mark up forward.
Do you think Peter Street's lack of mobility would be found out on the clinical docklands stadium ?
Originally posted by OldSchool
Doc, Surely the plan must be to use Peter Street for 10 minutes each Q and either give Darcy the occasional spell on the bench or more likely to move him forward as a marking option although his history would say that he is not a strong mark up forward.
Do you think Peter Street's lack of mobility would be found out on the clinical docklands stadium ?
Originally posted by localyokel
We nearly did a few years ago.
Originally posted by Tank
Wasn't Leon Cameron for Mal Michael the mooted trade?
Originally posted by stefoid
Pies confirm interest in Gilbs (only doggies player yet linked with another club)
The one thing that indicates to me that we only really want someone to give Darcy a spell in the ruck is the fact that we have just committed to him for 4 years and given him a very good pay rise yet if we were to get a quality ruck option there is a chance that Darcy might spend a lot of time forward where his history there indicates that he is not a noted mark or goal kicker.Originally posted by The Doctor
Yep, didn't make myself clear. Darcy still number 1 ruck with Street relieving. There could be games where Street could go in as 1st ruck against opponents Darcy might struggle with. This would allow Darcy to go forward.