- Jul 25, 2010
- 32,674
- 18,767
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Golden State Warriors NBA Champions
That trade definitely favours Collingwood.
Out of interest - how and why?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That trade definitely favours Collingwood.
That trade is weighted far too heavily in Collingwood's favour. They'd get Dangerfield for a completely unproven Scharenberg and a very minor downgrade in picks (we might actually have a higher pick than them by the end of the season). Can't see that happening.
No need for a comma there.
Collingwood get a top 5 elite player for Adam Oxley & Scharenburg and move a few spots back in the first round.
Collingwood wins by the length of the straight.
That trade is weighted far too heavily in Collingwood's favour. They'd get Dangerfield for a completely unproven Scharenberg and a very minor downgrade in picks (we might actually have a higher pick than them by the end of the season). Can't see that happening.
Collingwood get a top 5 elite player for Adam Oxley & Scharenburg and move a few spots back in the first round.
Collingwood wins by the length of the straight.
As would I, but I'd be praying to Lord Jesus/Ala/Buddha/whoever will listen that Aish & Scharenberg reach even half their potential in an AFC jumper, because we'd need them to if it meant losing a brownlow medal level game changer...Look, If PD leaves. I'm going to be happy if we end up with Aish, Schenberg and a top 5 pick and the look on Geelong face will be priceless.
Just an idea. Trying to make something work as i'm bored today.
The Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.
Ahh, I remember the old Playstation AFL trade weeks. Let's be honest, too many players involved. Don't think the brains trust of the AFL could handle something like that. They'd rather simple trades. It is the AFL after allMassive rumour going around.
Dangerfield to Collingwood
Scharenberg to crows
Aish to Crows
Oxley to Brisband
Crows get: Scharenberg, Aish & Collingwood first pick (approx 6 to 8)
Crows lose: Dangerfield, first round pick (to Collingwood), second round pick (to Brisbane)
Collingwood get: Dangerfield & Crows first pick (approx pick 10 to 12)
Collingwood lose: Oxley & first pick (approx 6 to 8)
Brisband get: Adam Oxley & crows second round pick (approx 26)
Lose: Aish
Haha, so it's a massive rumour that was conceived, and is currently going around in your head? Guess it's got as much weight as any other rumour going around.
This should be immortalised somewhere! As clever as I've seen on BF.Surely your sig should read 'You'll LEVER walker sloane'?
On the trade front. That policy allowing clubs to trade future draft picks. Is that coming in this year, or next?
On the trade front. That policy allowing clubs to trade future draft picks. Is that coming in this year, or next?
You would have to think next. Not enough time to allow clubs to prepare now for this year.
You would have to think next. Not enough time to allow clubs to prepare now for this year.
I'd rather give Danger away for free and keep our first and second round picks. No emoticon needed. I'm serious.Massive rumour going around.
Dangerfield to Collingwood
Scharenberg to crows
Aish to Crows
Oxley to Brisband
Crows get: Scharenberg, Aish & Collingwood first pick (approx 6 to 8)
Crows lose: Dangerfield, first round pick (to Collingwood), second round pick (to Brisbane)
Collingwood get: Dangerfield & Crows first pick (approx pick 10 to 12)
Collingwood lose: Oxley & first pick (approx 6 to 8)
Brisband get: Adam Oxley & crows second round pick (approx 26)
Lose: Aish
Been said many timesThis should be immortalised somewhere! As clever as I've seen on BF.
….Nice fluke newbie!
You would have to think next. Not enough time to allow clubs to prepare now for this year.
Out of interest - how and why?