Just don't click on the recycle bin plz
No Oppo Supporters Re-signing Tex, Danger and Sloane *** Crows Only ***
- Thread starter Allefgib
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
TexForPM
Premiership Player
All this arguing is bullshit. If you're making it aggressive it's not an opinion anymore you are trying to talk over someone with keyboard. Good luck with that.
I had a dream last night that someone I know somehow knew Patrick and gave me a handwritten note from Patrick, addressed to me, sincerely apologising that he would be going to Geelong next season. I couldn't read Danger's handwriting either.
- Oct 3, 2007
- 3,235
- 3,357
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- All OZ BBallerz,PPenguins,CBengals
For those saying we don't need Motlop and 1st round draft picks cause they develop in 3-4 years and ra ra, well Jake Lever pick 14 says hello.
- Thread starter
- #34,205
If he leaves we MUST get a player (or two) to keep our squad in a position to challenge the next few years.
The rest of the list management has us really focussed on challenging in the coming few years - Danger stays and we're right in the window (depending on coaching... geez that's a ******* mess, don't really want to change our gameplan but if we don't keep the current team together what can we do about it!)
Draft picks - yup need some, but need to convert them into players or also have players in the mix.
Huge offseason ahead.
Ideally we keep dange - and add a few pieces as well.
Really happy to hear that Fages has been pushing hard to ensure our guys are ready to act whether he stays or goes.
The rest of the list management has us really focussed on challenging in the coming few years - Danger stays and we're right in the window (depending on coaching... geez that's a ******* mess, don't really want to change our gameplan but if we don't keep the current team together what can we do about it!)
Draft picks - yup need some, but need to convert them into players or also have players in the mix.
Huge offseason ahead.
Ideally we keep dange - and add a few pieces as well.
Really happy to hear that Fages has been pushing hard to ensure our guys are ready to act whether he stays or goes.
Brenton Davy
Brownlow Medallist
Isn't that what the ignore button is for...
- Apr 18, 2012
- 2,960
- 1,465
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Jake was a pretty special case especially at 14.
Such a bargain.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
Far out Geelong are very desperate for him , they have:
Bloody cringeworthy
- Made an online petition for Paddy to come home
- Costa giving Dangerfield's mum a high up job
- The Geelong Advertiser releasing "come home Paddy stickers"
Bloody cringeworthy
Danoz
Dananananananana Statman (òÓ,)_\,,/
The extra p is for pyopp.
- Mar 5, 2015
- 2,861
- 3,429
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
What do they think the stickers and petition are going to do? Like dangers going to think, 'well they got a few hundred signature, guess I have to go to Geelong.'
Ease up. They've got to do something to pass the time whilst living in Geelong.
- Thread starter
- #34,213
My gut feel is we might be encouraging the AFL to make it appealing enough compensation wise to NOT matchSo we are matching if he chooses to leave
cammo6556
Cancelled
10k Posts
Baghdad Bombers - Sweet F.A.
BeanCoiNFT Investor
Podcaster
Zombie Lover
A Star Wars Fan
Well, given Ablett was two first rounders... I'm not sure we could expect any better than that???My gut feel is we might be encouraging the AFL to make it appealing enough compensation wise to NOT match
Danoz
Dananananananana Statman (òÓ,)_\,,/
Well the AFL has a history of giving different parties different results. Adelaide loses 2 first and 2 second round picks then the next year Essendon loses the same but is given an end of first round pick each year. Tribunal has zero integrity. What's to say we won't be given an extra 1st round pick if Danger leaves? 1 pick after our own as well as 1 end of first round pick? Maybe a mid first rd pick rather than an end of first round pick? Hawks will go bonkers, as we did when Ess got their picks, but will essentially fall on deaf ears.My gut feel is we might be encouraging the AFL to make it appealing enough compensation wise to NOT match
You see once again we get the chance for the AFL to manipulate and make it up as they go along.
They can look after us and Geelong by saying Danger will be two first round picks. Or they can low ball and screw us over, or if we are willing to match, they could screw Geelong over.
The problem with the AFL is they always make rules that are paper thin, easily manipulated and as transparent as dog s**t.
I really want to see us match any offer. Pretty sure the AFL don't want us to, but the AFL can GAGF as can Geelong.
2 premierships and a bownlow later you could argue he had fulfilled any obligation he had to the cats. Dangerfield is now approaching his prime.
cammo6556
Cancelled
10k Posts
Baghdad Bombers - Sweet F.A.
BeanCoiNFT Investor
Podcaster
Zombie Lover
A Star Wars Fan
Cannot argue with a word of that.
cammo6556
Cancelled
10k Posts
Baghdad Bombers - Sweet F.A.
BeanCoiNFT Investor
Podcaster
Zombie Lover
A Star Wars Fan
Fairly plain to see Ablett had some (a helluva lot) of sublime football left in him when it occurred, though.
GROTTO
TheBrownDog
- Jul 5, 2013
- 66,808
- 89,716
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Yeah we could, by matching the Geelong offer and force the Cats to give us their first rounder which will be a higher pick and Motlop. Thereby dismantling their ability to rebuild their list.
Like Beat the Bomb
jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
Heaps.
- Status
Similar threads
