evo
Let's hit the f*ken road!
very trueI find no political 'system' to be practical. It is impossible for any of them to ever be implemented in actuality. None of which will prevent people pretending that it is practical and possible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
very trueI find no political 'system' to be practical. It is impossible for any of them to ever be implemented in actuality. None of which will prevent people pretending that it is practical and possible.
those with the most to lose are always the toadies.His advisers where like the Memphis Mafia to Elvis "prescription drugs are OK E"! - they kept telling him that he had a God Given right to Govern that could not be restricted by commoners - and this was in the 20th Century for God's sake!
very true
You have not tried my political system yet.I find no political 'system' to be practical. It is impossible for any of them to ever be implemented in actuality. None of which will prevent people pretending that it is practical and possible.
You have not tried my political system yet.
It relies heavily on a relaxation based economy driven by inexpensive but abundant exotic foods and liqueurs, state supplied ales and nibbles at 3-5 every arvo and late night bingo.
This economy is funded by a heavy tax on weight loss programs and a heavy duty on all "reality television" programming on a stupidity based sliding scale, which would see "Customs" attract a 30% duty on all production costs as well as a mandatory 50% tax on sales and "Rat Bastards" an 80% production duty, 65% tax on income from sales and the standard flat rate weekly $100.000.00 Offensive American Drawl and Grammatical Perversion Tariff (OADGP) attracted by all US productions featuring inbred morons as their main "talent".
No.
1/ It requires a totalitarian government to implement it
2/Its successful implementation relies on a highly efficient bureaucracy (a contradiction in terms)
3/ It requires humans to transcend their self-interested nature.
Trotsky is a man whose influence is underrated in the revolution, he may have also been a option than Stalin.
WWII was purely a continuation of WWI which ended purely because of a lack of resources and the fact neither side could survive another cold winter. WWI would still of happened, but how it finished may of been very different. The simmering tensions had been there for some time and were only waiting for the spark to ignite them, but a more effective truce may of been able to of been achieved.If only the Rockefellers didn't want oil to not be controlled by socialist nations, otherwise it's price would been to low for a capitalist company to operate a profit and pay for all those bribes.Russia would be a very different place, so would be the world.
WW2 probably wouldn't of happened, a treaty would of been struck long before 1918 as well.Possibly ww1 may not of started and the Ukranians and Austrians would of worked a few things out.
Hey everyone, though we could have an intelligent discussion on the Russian Revolution arguably one ofthe most impportant eventsof the 20th century.
- What are your thoughts on Lenin and his ideas?
- Was Tsar Nicholas a hopeless leader?
- Comments on Rasputin, the "mad monk"
- Comments on the civil war...
It brought to worldwide attention the worlds most outstanding hats.
Astrakhan fur FTW
Germany and Japan are covered in year 11, Russia and Australia (which is quite boring in comparison) are covered in year 12.
The Tsar's refusal to hand over significant legislative power to the Duma ("We will not follow the British!") meant that revolution was largely inevitable in some form or another - some argue that if Alexei was not a haemophiliac then Rasuptin would not have been given so much latitude and the spark of revolution during Nicholas II's reign may have not ignited but personally I think that would have been delay not avoidance.Was the revolution worth it? I appreciate times were tough under the Tsar but the last 90 odd years has not been rosy either.
The Tsar's refusal to hand over significant legislative power to the Duma ("We will not follow the British!") meant that revolution was largely inevitable in some form or another - some argue that if Alexei was not a haemophiliac then Rasuptin would not have been given so much latitude and the spark of revolution during Nicholas II's reign may have not ignited but personally I think that would have been delay not avoidance.
Communism was a growing force in Europe pre- and during WW1 (noting the failed 1905 revolution sowed seeds in Russia earlier) and the Communist party only narrowly lost to the Facists in post-WW1 Germany.
but what about those who have grown up in said system. Who sublimate statist and national tendencies as part of their identity. I would not be the same person if i grew up in hanoi.3/ It requires humans to transcend their self-interested nature.
see: Stalin and Ukraine famine. There was a protest at Fed Squard just after Christmas, apparently the Ukraines have finally got access to the records on this. Millions died in Ukraine famine too, because of the bungling in the dept of Agriculture.It has already been implemented in the way Marx intended:
-1950s China - The 'great leap forward'. The result was the starvation of 20 million peasants through bureaucratic bungling. And the 'cultural revolution', whereby most intellectuals, religious leaders and sundry 'traitors' were tortured and killed.
Dennis Rodman takes exception to this post.- current day North Korea