The Redemption
Team Captain
- Apr 5, 2015
- 375
- 512
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Banned
- #9,851
Are you able to translate that in to something that makes sense for us?
Are you able to stop fighting fights that have nothing to do with you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you able to translate that in to something that makes sense for us?
I wouldn't attempt getting reason. I sense a trollAre you able to translate that in to something that makes sense for us?
Did you feel the same way when Mickey O stuck it up the West Coast supporters a number of years back?
Or was is Tredrea or some other Port player who gave fans the bird after a goal? Apologies if it wasn't Port.
Or when Lockett booted the ball into the spectator?
I can't believe there is so much outrage over Goodes's little dance. FFS you little shits, find something in the world that truly represents the level of your outrage.
so tell me again what has Adam Goodes done to help reconciliation?
What have you done to help it?
There was an invasion though, right? So arguing pedantics over which word should be used to describe it is really just showing your desire for an argument
So who decides what a "country" is?Huh? Who said anything about 40,000 of culture? I thought we were discussing the status of this continent as a country? Clearly one of us here is hung up on race, and it sure ain't me.
I'm not confused in the slightest. For the sake of both of you, I think you need to read what I have written. When I post about "Australia being a country" I am referring to the continent we know as Australia not being a country; i.e. one country. There was no, let's invade this country concept when colonising Australian lands. The continent was just too vast and unknown for that to be a genuine concept. Which is why different people settled in different parts of the continent and it took more than 100 years for them to unite. Perhaps in this modern small-world setting it's a struggle for some to abandon modern perspective and surrender to the confines of passed perspectives, but boy I just see a whole lot of stuff here getting bent out of shape; people included.
Did you even see the GIF?
Also, what are you insinuating with the second bit?
There is no fight here, just trying to understand what you're sayingAre you able to stop fighting fights that have nothing to do with you?
Just imagine...Imagine if Goodes was gay. And ran at the crowd miming fellatio.
Imagine if Goodes was gay. And ran at the crowd miming fellatio.
Well again, you're arguing semantics. The Aboriginals had the land, the Europeans invaded and colonised it. It's not really in dispute.No, there was no invasion. I've shown pretty logically this to be the case. I'm supposing you accuse me of being a pedant though as a means of seeking impunity from disagreement lest the disagreeing party be "resorting to" something or having something "fallen over" or simply being "pedantic" or some such nonsense. But nah sorry. I just don't agree that there was an invasion on Jan 26th 1788. How you deal with that is your issue.
All the people saying boo-ing is racist will now all love Sam Newman?
I almost logged on to reply to the above. How far gone are you, that you honestly believe that in contemporary australia, kids are taught that blacks are inferior or that it is ok to abuse them. Then your comment about about the mother. In your need to cry racism, I'm afraid you've become hateful.
Then people could say "I'm not homophobic. I'm just uncomfortable with an outspoken Aborigine "
No, there was no invasion. I've shown pretty logically this to be the case. I'm supposing you accuse me of being a pedant though as a means of seeking impunity from disagreement lest the disagreeing party be "resorting to" something or having something "fallen over" or simply being "pedantic" or some such nonsense. But nah sorry. I just don't agree that there was an invasion on Jan 26th 1788. How you deal with that is your issue.
One man's colonization is another man's invasion. Either way, 1) 50,000 years of continuous culture was destroyed practically overnight.
2) And yet we now feel outraged that the descendants of that community have had enough of being called apes.
Lol. I'm on the busI'm all for hypotheticals but this one is seriously underdeveloped.
Lol. I'm on the bus
Anyway I'm wondering how threatened the mob would be by an outspoken gay footballer.
So when the Whermacht went into Czechoslavakia in 1938 un-resisted or the Anshluss in Austria un-resisted it wasn't an invasion? This is a leg pull isn't it? Mate stay in LA you have singlehandedly done more for raising the Australian IQ level than more than a century of universal education.No, there was no invasion. I've shown pretty logically this to be the case. I'm supposing you accuse me of being a pedant though as a means of seeking impunity from disagreement lest the disagreeing party be "resorting to" something or having something "fallen over" or simply being "pedantic" or some such nonsense. But nah sorry. I just don't agree that there was an invasion on Jan 26th 1788. How you deal with that is your issue.