SES SA
All Australian
- Sep 22, 2014
- 896
- 964
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Well, if Tom reads this, he'll get a bit of a history lesson of the club ... I hope he likes history.
View attachment 196181
I really hope he never does.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, if Tom reads this, he'll get a bit of a history lesson of the club ... I hope he likes history.
View attachment 196181
I say bullshit, how can you guarantee anything, do you know these guys personally, get along and check our very own Skippos's You tube channel, easily the most comprehensive video footage available on draft candidates and certainly as good as what the AFL put out there.
IMO it's not their opinions .....it's a reflection of rumors they hear ...and in the end most reflect fairly closely each other
I'd prefer they have their Phantom Drafts set in stone two weeks out .....then we know it's actually their skills in talent identification
It makes it an honest appraisal of your thoughts on potential draftees ......it may not be an accurate reflection of the actual outcome, but as you say you don't have the same access to sourcesMan, I wish I had sources! I've had the most inaccurate phantom draft for the last few years. 10% of my top 50 ranked players weren't even drafted. So does that make mine good?
Never change Chris. I like your PD because it never pretends to be anything other than it is - one punters personal opinion. As readers we can choose to click and read or not.Man, I wish I had sources! I've had the most inaccurate phantom draft for the last few years. 10% of my top 50 ranked players weren't even drafted. So does that make mine good?
The list manager maybe, but scouts are not exactly the rich men of AFL footy...BOOM.
Nail meet head.
If these mock draft guys are so good, why are they not earning double working as recruiters?
Whilst I think Hawthorn were clearly a better side then us (although not on the night), it's not as if we were lucky to make the prelim given we finished 2nd in the H&A season for memory.We were miles off it in 2012
People forget that we were lucky as **** to be there, and that Hawks team was struck down by gastro;
And you'd say only Terlich and Kommer (excl RAt) were who you could say were missedexactly my point, thanks.
His sample size was small .....lets face it most would not have been studying his limited games, particularly as a close checking defenderHopefully Doedee is just yet another player who makes me look stupid for overlooking him.
I was kinda just being funny. you humorless git.
Footy is fun.
You bowled a half volley, I dispatched it to the fence.
well im nothing special and I have over 900 friends and yeah I have met them all at least once.
It makes it an honest appraisal of your thoughts on potential draftees ......it may not be an accurate reflection of the actual outcome, but as you say you don't have the same access to sources
At least it's a better read, a different POV, to all those oh so similar that end up being clones of each other
Love Knightmares drafts as well .......but as i said i would prefer he keep his list his (minus sources) ......rather than change it constantly in the last 2 weeks, so it actually doesn't end up a reflection of his own thoughts
What i prefer is people such as you Chris and Knightmare's personal assessment of players ......leave the final phantom order to those with club sources
Well done during the year Chris .....great effort & a great resource
Mmm......isn't kicking more critical thru zones as a defender , than as a forward shooting for goal ?I see the Richmond folk are saying "our" boy Callum Moore has been told by the club he will likely be developed as a Defender/Backman.
Mmm......isn't kicking more critical thru zones as a defender , than as a forward shooting for goal ?
What ever way you cut it there lists are pretty right, so obviously they herd nothing or there were no rumors or information about doedee being taken any higher than 32.They don't get it right. They crib information until it's largely been leaked
Look at the difference between 4 weeks out & 1 day out
It's just recycled public knowledge. Where phantoms go wrong is that clubs have been tracking the players for 3 or 4 years, whereas they are just passing on what they hear in the TAC cup & championships and read online
people been hearing 'easy draw' so long theyre starting to believe itWhilst I think Hawthorn were clearly a better side then us (although not on the night), it's not as if we were lucky to make the prelim given we finished 2nd in the H&A season for memory.
We may have also been the first club in history to be stripped off a premiership. The horribly biased umpiring may have done us a favour.
We were miles off it in 2012
People forget that we were lucky as **** to be there, and that Hawks team was struck down by gastro;
Just saying
Just saying what? we would have had to delist a player by either trading 17 for a pick and a player or 2 picks. It seems pretty obvious we went in hoping for someone to make it to us, they didnt, so we picked the next best on our list, not sure why you cant get on board with that.
Just saying