He might have gone the next pickPredicted by who?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He might have gone the next pickPredicted by who?
Probably the same people who predicted Doedee at 70Predicted by who?
No one had Dangerfield going near the top 10.Predicted by who?
I want to see evidence, where's the evidence, I see no evidenceHe might have gone the next pick
Unfortunately it's not spot on, it's exaggeration at its finest.Spot on!
No issue posters questioning the decision. That's only fair.
... But to already claim the selection is an almighty stuff up because they know nothing about him is jumping to a massive conclusion when really have no idea unlike the recruiting staff who have spent considerable time weighing up the options.
Writing off someone before you even know their capabilities us terribly short-sighted.
Who is no one? Phantoms or other clubs recruiters?No one had Dangerfield going near the top 10.
It's a blatant lieUnfortunately it's not spot on, it's exaggeration at its finest.
These so called phantom drafters.Who is no one? Phantoms or other clubs recruiters?
He was taken well before predicted, as was Sloane.
Matt burgan had him at 14 to the Dee'sNo one had Dangerfield going near the top 10.
Both were left field, just one more than the other. Go & re-read the Dangerfield thread. It is deja vu!I don't believe Patrick was anywhere near as left field selection as Tom.
How about you take notice of your signature Kane ???? ......some debates aren't worth the griefBoth were left field, just one more than the other. Go & re-read the Dangerfield thread. It is deja vu!
Both were left field, just one more than the other. Go & re-read the Dangerfield thread. It is deja vu!
Let's hope it is! Except the leaving partBoth were left field, just one more than the other. Go & re-read the Dangerfield thread. It is deja vu!
How about you take notice of your signature Kane ????
No one had him top 10 - most had him nowhere near it... & because of it, this board went into meltdown! If Dangerfield was taken where he was expected, this board would have reacted more like milera!Matt burgan had him at 14 to the Dee's
That's only because we overlooked an Ebert for an interstater.Both were left field, just one more than the other. Go & re-read the Dangerfield thread. It is deja vu!
14 is pretty close to 10 Kane and you know why it went into meltdownNo one had him top 10 - most had him nowhere near it... & because of it, this board went into meltdown! If Dangerfield was taken where he was expected, this board would have reacted more like milera!
As do the crappy one linersAnd the circle of nothingness continues
As do the crappy one liners
How have I embarrassed myself? Show me an embarrassing quote.Keep embarrassing yourself. You're doing a great job
How have I embarrassed myself? Show me an embarrassing quote.
And it's good to see you've moved up to to two lines.
You are right, I should leave the posters with an opposing view just post, WFLBy continuing with this boring repetition, Cleric.
You are right, I should leave the posters with an opposing view just post, WFL