Pess, just minding my own business pottsie
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hockeys not even affable any more now the diets made him mean
Glad im not a fed public servant, his daily diet could coincide with your demise
He was groomed as a schoolboy by political Catholics. The Rhodes Scholar thing doesn't surprise me when you have that sort of backing from a very young age."Vote for the man with the ahhh um two not bad looking daughters"
For a Rhode Scholar my god he is good at sounding like an idiot.
"Vote for the man with the ahhh um two not bad looking daughters"
For a Rhode Scholar my god he is good at sounding like an idiot.
Lol. Rudd's daughter Jessica is stunning also for what it's worth. And yes he did unfortunately say that. The man is going to be an international embarrassment.Did he really say that ?
I wonder if the ugly daughter will vote for him after that. Big mistake
"Vote for the man with the ahhh um two not bad looking daughters"
For a Rhode Scholar my god he is good at sounding like an idiot.
he got the rhodes scholarship cos he was good at union. and they always put forward a candidate at sydney uni rugby. my auntie taught him at law faculty, arrogant pr!ck, but not the smartest cadre"Vote for the man with the ahhh um two not bad looking daughters"
For a Rhode Scholar my god he is good at sounding like an idiot.
If he really wants to go down that sexist path I'd argue Jessica Rudd has the pair of them covered.
I detest Abbott and wouldn't be particularly upset if he were gunned down tomorrow but I don't see anything wrong with that clip. It was for Big Brother ffs. He wasn't addressing the US Senate or a visiting gaggle of diplomats. And it is clearly true that his daughters 'aren't bad-looking'. And if the peanuts who populate the Big Brother house are as clueless as they were back when I watched the show ten years ago, that is probably the best pitch Abbott could make to win their votes.
You desperadoes are clinging at anything you can find against Tony. It's embarrassing. Just be thankful that Australia's worst government in history will be removed in a few days.
I would say someone having a joke on big brother would constitute you clinging to something.There's no need to cling to anything, Tony keeps throwing out all sorts of gems exposing him for being a detestable excuse for a human being
I detest Abbott and wouldn't be particularly upset if he were gunned down tomorrow but I don't see anything wrong with that clip.
There's no need to cling to anything, Tony keeps throwing out all sorts of gems exposing him for being a detestable excuse for a human being
I would say someone having a joke on big brother would constitute you clinging to something.
What sort of like the entire Murdoch press has against Labor? You certainly appeared to have swallowed their shite hook line and sinker.You desperadoes are clinging at anything you can find against Tony.
Where'd I say he 'deserves' to be shot?What has he ever done to deserve being shot?
It's not like he's a vile self entitlted type like Rudd.
What did Abbott call a 'fad' exactly?Don't let blind idolatry prevent you from seeing legitimate criticisms.
I'll be going to Germany next year to see a close friend marry her female partner of many years, because they can't do it here. Guess which ignorant old man called that a fad only a week or two ago? No, not the even more ignorant and older man who called it wrong and detrimental to children today while out campaigning for the former.
What did Abbott call a 'fad' exactly?
My understanding was that he was referring to popular sentiment being for gay marriage. By historical standards, it is unusual that the majority of people support it, and there is every chance that at some point in the future, public sentiment will again be against it.
I don't think he was suggesting that homosexuality is a fad.
He called gay marriage a fad, plain and simple. Anything else is just recovery spin, not to mention your "by historical standards" argument is completely absurd, because we don't ban things just because "everyone has always been in favour of it before, so being against it now can't be right"
I don't think your mind is open enough to engage with the simple point I tried to make.He called gay marriage a fad, plain and simple. Anything else is just recovery spin, not to mention your "by historical standards" argument is completely absurd, because we don't ban things just because "everyone has always been in favour of it before, so being against it now can't be right"