Projecting your own fantasies, or in need of better glasses.
WADA finds high tb4 levels in Bombers pair.
- Thread starter Dugdale2Dwyer
- Start date
- Tagged users None
ripped this off a tumblr account, think that internet media is still working...
“The conclusion was that the highest incidence of reported doping wasn’t at the elite end, because they are tested a fair amount — there is a credible threat — or at the low end, the beginners, because they’re just getting into the sport,” Bouchard-Hall said. “The highest incidence was in Cat.2, Cat. 3, Cat. 4. They start to get really passionate about the sport and want to do well, but there was zero perceived threat of being tested.”
Read more at http://velonews.competitor.com/2015...and-amateur-racing_389517#rqUqGgejUCxX2ZFJ.99
“The conclusion was that the highest incidence of reported doping wasn’t at the elite end, because they are tested a fair amount — there is a credible threat — or at the low end, the beginners, because they’re just getting into the sport,” Bouchard-Hall said. “The highest incidence was in Cat.2, Cat. 3, Cat. 4. They start to get really passionate about the sport and want to do well, but there was zero perceived threat of being tested.”
Read more at http://velonews.competitor.com/2015...and-amateur-racing_389517#rqUqGgejUCxX2ZFJ.99
http://veloclinic.tumblr.com/post/133554461013/the-conclusion-was-that-the-highest-incidence-of
"trying to find the actual data to support this statement. i don’t think it actually exists. what does seem to exist is anecdote, suspicion, and a handful of cases. the important statistic though is what is the percent prevalance. this is key to understanding whether testing amateurs has any real shot at making a difference beyond the occasional headline and forum shaming.
it’s interesting that this new area of focus mirrors statements from UKAD stating that doping is problematic in the amateur ranks but denying any problem at the elite level of sport.
the concern here?
are we seeing the development of perpetual positive dope test machine for the sake of padding credibility and possibly not much else ?"
"trying to find the actual data to support this statement. i don’t think it actually exists. what does seem to exist is anecdote, suspicion, and a handful of cases. the important statistic though is what is the percent prevalance. this is key to understanding whether testing amateurs has any real shot at making a difference beyond the occasional headline and forum shaming.
it’s interesting that this new area of focus mirrors statements from UKAD stating that doping is problematic in the amateur ranks but denying any problem at the elite level of sport.
the concern here?
are we seeing the development of perpetual positive dope test machine for the sake of padding credibility and possibly not much else ?"
