Captains Round 2 VC / Captain

[SterlingArcher]

Dangerfield C.

 

[WaynesWorld19]

Dangerfield C.

Good luck with that ........could still be a late out ........could be with Ablett, two seagulls fighting over "chips" ....we just do not know enough to take that risk

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

Good luck with that ........could still be a late out ........could be with Ablett, two seagulls fighting over "chips" ....we just do not know enough to take that risk

Grow some balls Wayne FFS

 

[WaynesWorld19]

Grow some balls Wayne FFS

 

[SavDog23]

Good luck with that ........could still be a late out ........could be with Ablett, two seagulls fighting over "chips" ....we just do not know enough to take that risk

Could also go 200+
Worst case is he goes 120 which is pretty much he same as all other VC/C options except Dusty.

 

[WaynesWorld19]

Could also go 200+
Worst case is he goes 120 which is pretty much he same as all other VC/C options except Dusty.

I'm not so heartless to provide you a consoling shoulder after tomorrows game .....we should all accept that not all Coaches care about winning, some just want to participate

 

[SterlingArcher]

I'm not so heartless to provide you a consoling shoulder after tomorrows game .....we should all accept that not all Coaches care about winning, some just want to participate

4 of his last 6 scores v Hawthorn 140+. Risky, yep. But not as big a risk as it seems I reckon.

If people can pick Scott Lycett I can convince myself Danger C v Hawthorn is worth the risk.

 

[SterlingArcher]

Also if he is a late out I`ll bank Fyfes 120 which isn't too shabby. Mitchell/Martin didn't even average that last year so 120 is definitely a reasonable C score.

 

[Blueboys11]

4 of his last 6 scores v Hawthorn 140+. Risky, yep. But not as big a risk as it seems I reckon.

If people can pick Scott Lycett I can convince myself Danger C v Hawthorn is worth the risk.

I hadn’t even considered any other option until I looked in this thread. Assumed it was a no brainer as Danger loves the Hawks. And if he is a late out I’ve got my Dusty VC loophole player.

I’m not paying 750k for a player not to trust him with the captains armband

 

[WaynesWorld19]

4 of his last 6 scores v Hawthorn 140+. Risky, yep. But not as big a risk as it seems I reckon.

If people can pick Scott Lycett I can convince myself Danger C v Hawthorn is worth the risk.

Think most of those Coaches are currently on prescribed medication, as a result of that decision though

 

[hoddo]

Could also go 200+
Worst case is he goes 120 which is pretty much he same as all other VC/C options except Dusty.

No worst case is that his hammy isn't right yet after all and he's off in the first quarter with just a handful of points.
I don't believe that will happen which is why I kept him in my team, but the possibility it might is why I want to see him play a game before reinstating him to his perma-captain role.

 

[SavDog23]

No worst case is that his hammy isn't right yet after all and he's off in the first quarter with just a handful of points.
I don't believe that will happen which is why I kept him in my team, but the possibility it might is why I want to see him play a game before reinstating him to his perma-captain role.

Danger and Scott even said that he could have played last week, but decided not to because they thought they could go alright without him, with GAJ basically replacing his role.
He'll be fine.

 

[WaynesWorld19]

No worst case is that his hammy isn't right yet after all and he's off in the first quarter with just a handful of points.
I don't believe that will happen which is why I kept him in my team, but the possibility it might is why I want to see him play a game before reinstating him to his perma-captain role.

For me i want to see a couple at least, to understand any role change (Hibberd), with Ablett now in the mix

 

[hoddo]

Danger and Scott even said that he could have played last week, but decided not to because they thought they could go alright without him, with GAJ basically replacing his role.
He'll be fine.

Yes I know they did. Again that's why I didn't consider dumping him from my team. Like I said I don't think he'll have a problem either.
I was just stating what could happen and is therefor the worst case.

 

[stevebbb]

I'm scared the Cats will put a very close tag on Titch this weekend. After all the attention he's gotten this past week, surely Scott wants to prove a point. He'll look silly if Titch goes 40+

Bank Fyfe's 120 or roll the dice?

 

[WaynesWorld19]

I'm scared the Cats will put a very close tag on Titch this weekend. After all the attention he's gotten this past week, surely Scott wants to prove a point. He'll look silly if Titch goes 40+

Bank Fyfe's 120 or roll the dice?

Who's their tagger though ? .......Scott Selwood isn't playing

 

[hoddo]

I'm scared the Cats will put a very close tag on Titch this weekend. After all the attention he's gotten this past week, surely Scott wants to prove a point. He'll look silly if Titch goes 40+

Bank Fyfe's 120 or roll the dice?

Does Geelong tag though? They seem to just back their champion mids to outdo whatever the opposition ones can manage.

120's a tough score to pass on though. I'm not sure I should be passing up Cripps's 115

 

[stevebbb]

Who's their tagger though ? .......Scott Selwood isn't playing

No clue. Hasn't Cam Guthrie done some tagging in his time? Any of the kids could be sent to him

 

[WaynesWorld19]

No clue. Hasn't Cam Guthrie done some tagging in his time? Any of the kids could be sent to him

Yes Cam has tagged B4 ......but we can only hope as a Mitchell (C) owner, that they do send a kid to him

 

[stevebbb]

Does Geelong tag though? They seem to just back their champion mids to outdo whatever the opposition ones can manage.

120's a tough score to pass on though. I'm not sure I should be passing up Cripps's 115

It's a -40/+40 predicament
Worst case he scores 80; if he gets his Hawthorn average it's even; best case he scores 160

 

[WaynesWorld19]

Does Geelong tag though? They seem to just back their champion mids to outdo whatever the opposition ones can manage.

120's a tough score to pass on though. I'm not sure I should be passing up Cripps's 115

This ! .......my take & knowing Danger from his ADEL days ......all one-way offense, believing they'll do more damage as a midfield, than Mitchell & O'Meara will for Hawthorn

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

InB4DangerlessthanHurn

 

[Art Vandelay_]

No clue. Hasn't Cam Guthrie done some tagging in his time? Any of the kids could be sent to him

He has. I maintain we’d have won last seasons QF had he not got injured. He had limited Dusty’s influence but got off the chain after he went off.

Alas he’s still in doubt but if he plays he’s highly likely to go to Rioli. They’ll ensure that genuine crab has no influence.

 

[Glorin]

No clue. Hasn't Cam Guthrie done some tagging in his time? Any of the kids could be sent to him

You dont send a boy to do a mans job...

 

[samFFC]

I hadn’t even considered any other option until I looked in this thread. Assumed it was a no brainer as Danger loves the Hawks. And if he is a late out I’ve got my Dusty VC loophole player.

I’m not paying 750k for a player not to trust him with the captains armband

You're backing Danger to beat 160?