- Joined
- Aug 26, 2004
- Posts
- 110,750
- Reaction score
- 225,464
- Location
- CHANEL BOUTIQUE!
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
"Goddess"

- Staff
- #476
7 more sleeps!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

"Goddess"

I found it a bit odd we didn't test a little more in the JLT like Gibbons in the middle, Cas getting a run in the forward line especially after C Curnow had a bit of a knock in JLT 1.
Would have been nice to see a little more variety, but I guess we need the team to gel also.
JLT 1: 15 disposals - 3 tackles - 5 clearances - 3 goals
JLT 2: 14 disposals - 4 tackles - 2 goals
Is David Cuningham in the mix to play Round 1?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Mix, you ask he is in?JLT 1: 15 disposals - 3 tackles - 5 clearances - 3 goals
JLT 2: 14 disposals - 4 tackles - 2 goals
Is David Cuningham in the mix to play Round 1?
Doesn't the 666 enable sides to play forwards deeper thereby allowing a player such as Levi to run and jump at a forward entry from CS bounce?
Tigers stripped back every area of the club, membership, recruiting, drafting, development, then built belief, continuity, cohesion
In the fullness of time
We know Charlie can play, McKay has proven himself no second fiddle this preseason and the later stage of last year, and Cunningham steped up this JLT in a big way also. Fasolo and McGovern have shown X-Factor. Although we might be coming off a bit excited we finally have a forward line to get excited about.This.
Round 4+ when all clubs have settled down and adjusted, you'd think this match would be close to a foregone conclusion (as much as any are), but with the chaos and unknowns of round 1, there is a much greater chance of an upset.
I'd also add that the uncertainty over Richmond's forward line would also be working in your favor. Caddy & Castagna out, Lynch maybe a 50/50 (and never having played for us, so what he'll contribute is a maybe as well) and even Jack being only a probable starter (his Mrs is due around that day). A forward/Ruck contingent of (probably 3 out of) Nankervis, Soldo, Balta & Moore wouldn't exactly strike terror into oppositions, and whatever we do field is unlikely to work as a unit all that well.
That said, the talk in this thread about your forwards dominating seems unlikely to me, given the Richmond back line would be pretty settled has has looked solid enough during the pre season. (basically,the reverse of our forward line issues).
In the mix?
He's a lock
in orderI have Garlett, Polson and O'Brian fighting it out for the last spot on the bench, who wins that battle???
we don't vo rogue good.......We will win. Will get off to a fast start and they won’t catch us
I don't think Polson has shown absolutely anything in his time at the club. I think Garlett plays but would prefer L'OB, he links up well, beautiful kick and has absolutely no issues running hard for 4 quarters.I have Garlett, Polson and O'Brian fighting it out for the last spot on the bench, who wins that battle???
Polson plays a roll. It's not all about stats, or eye popping skills.I don't think Polson has shown absolutely anything in his time at the club. I think Garlett plays but would prefer L'OB, he links up well, beautiful kick and has absolutely no issues running hard for 4 quarters.
we didn't vo rogue good.......
I know he plays a role but the only thing he can do is apply pressure. He does nothing when we have the ball. We've got serious issues if he's in our best 22.Polson plays a roll. It's not all about stats, or eye popping skills.
I'd be very surprised if he didn't play round 1.
Polson will need to show he can grow his game over time, no doubt. But they’ll play him for at least the first 2-3 games imo. If he continues to do what is asked of him he’ll continue to play.I know he plays a role but the only thing he can do is apply pressure. He does nothing when we have the ball. We've got serious issues if he's in our best 22.
I'd have Gibbons, Cuningham both ahead of him and if Fasolo is fit I'd have him ahead as well. All three of them have shown an ability to hit the scoreboard, which one would you eave out? Probably Fas?Polson will need to show he can grow his game over time, no doubt. But they’ll play him for at least the first 2-3 games imo. If he continues to do what is asked of him he’ll continue to play.
I know he plays a role but the only thing he can do is apply pressure. He does nothing when we have the ball. We've got serious issues if he's in our best 22.
Going to be fun getting the popcorn out when Polson is in the line-up.I'd have Gibbons, Cuningham both ahead of him and if Fasolo is fit I'd have him ahead as well. All three of them have shown an ability to hit the scoreboard, which one would you eave out? Probably Fas?
It has to be pressure acts, is there somewhere I can find JLT pressure act stats?Going to be fun getting the popcorn out when Polson is in the line-up.
He obviously does something right.
Cuningham definitely plays. Fasolo could benefit from another run in the VFL, but is a definite chance. Gibbons misses for my money.I'd have Gibbons, Cuningham both ahead of him and if Fasolo is fit I'd have him ahead as well. All three of them have shown an ability to hit the scoreboard, which one would you eave out? Probably Fas?
ps: huge lob fan but need to be placated with regard to cam_po................placate me at once, ffs.............in order
garlett
lob
polson
think garlett has done enough
