- Banned
- #976
That’s a lot of words for you to simply say “I missed your post where you clarified that it wasn’t directed at me”.
But that's almost a complete misrepresentation of what I was saying isn't it? If you want earnest discussion on the issue but deal with other people who want to do likewise, in this manner, I'm surprised anyone discusses it with you in length at all. It would be true to say I haven't been perfect myself. I'm at least humble enough to concede that. I also said earlier if I could go back in time there are some things I would have said differently or not said at all. I don't see any concession likely to emanate from you in similar vein. I wish that wasn't the case, I'd love to discuss the issue further, despite my relative newbness on it.
But again, all this doesn’t matter at all. So let’s drop it totally.
I’m still happy to discuss 9/11 with you - so if you’re interested, back to my original question....
You say the official story has holes. I feel that it’s very likely I disagree with your opinion on any alleged “holes”, as you see them.
What’s the biggest hole, in your opinion? Perhaps I can change your mind, or show you something you haven’t seen before that may change it?
I can't see there being much chance of going there now. I don't want to spend time discussing issues on the internet with people who are prepared to misrepresent and twist in order to be perceived by others to be winning an argument. I'd rather spend time with people who readily admit they're human and occasionally make mistakes and whose ultimate goal is the truth.
Last edited: