No Oppo Supporters Hawks and Pokies

Remove this Banner Ad

Only the Casino has pokies in WA.
Does that mean there are no gambling problems in WA?

Are computer game addicts giving gamblers a bad name?
Are you trying to suggest that the presence of other evil makes out evil permissible? Or less evil? for the record, I’d have a problem if we were sponsored by candy crush which is built on the exact same principles as pokies.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

See the thing is, its not unprecedented in our society for choices to be taken away (or restricted) from people, where the harm caused by their choice is considered "excessive" and "unacceptable" to a wider cross-section of society.. see drugs, guns, etc. The reason gambling is allowed is simple, the money generated outweighs the negative social outcomes to a point where we find it stomachable to wear the costs. Same thing for tobacco products.

A little less bottom line and a little more humanity wouldn't go astray.
As the saying goes..... it's all fun and games until someone gets hurt.
Or perhaps.....there's always a few who wreck it for everyone else.
I think our club does humanity pretty well
 
Are you trying to suggest that the presence of other evil makes out evil permissible? Or less evil? for the record, I’d have a problem if we were sponsored by candy crush which is built on the exact same principles as pokies.

Trying to work out if iinet is also evil.
As they make money selling internet data to people who could be addicted to electronic entertainment, You pay to play.
I see pokies as a form of electronic entertainment, You pay to play.
 
Trying to work out if iinet is also evil.
As they make money selling internet data to people who could be addicted to electronic entertainment, You pay to play.
I see pokies as a form of electronic entertainment, You pay to play.
Not sure iiNet is evil as such, but their product has been absolute garbage at my place all day & if they don't fix it, they'll find it to be very hazardous to their collective health...
 
Perception.
The right thing depends on who is judging it.
Was Luke Skywalker a freedom fighter or a terrorist?
Yes that's an extremely good example......

So Pokies operators must be Robin Hood. Stealing from the rich and giving to the poor... Oh wait I think we are the Sherrif of Nottingham in this one
 
Perception.
The right thing depends on who is judging it.
Was Luke Skywalker a freedom fighter or a terrorist?
He was rebel scum.


Sent by shoephone via Tapatoe
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

People’s lack of compassion always surprises me.
It shouldn't, nor should peoples lack of accountability for their actions and choices.
Compassion for gamblers, I'll pass thx and save it for a more worthwhile cause.
 
So your saying that you dont mind if hfc take advantage of addicts because youre not an addict and it doesnt affect you personally one way or the other, so open slather then?
Some people are just wired that way. You think you’re saving them by believing that Hawthorn should pull out of poker machines. You think if you got rid of pokies then they would be better off. Not so, they’ll find something else to throw their money away on. It is how it is. Some people are just ******* hopeless with money and don’t know how to keep it.
 
People’s lack of compassion always surprises me.
A fair point.

An even fairer point is how many people have no concept of "taking responibilty for their own actions"

I mean to say anyone with at least a fraction of intelligence knows the things are rigged, just wise up.

I get the whole "addiction" thing I really do, but FFS you cant help some people who refuse to hear the "Penny Drop" even though that penny drops over and over again.

As soon as they are outlawed I will be the first one to say "Thank * for that".
Until then anyone stupid enough to donate to Hawks bottom line this way, are ok by me.

I have more compassion for those brain washed morons who donate money to the Catholic Church, I mean they seriously need help.
 
A fair point.

An even fairer point is how many people have no concept of "taking responibilty for their own actions"

I mean to say anyone with at least a fraction of intelligence knows the things are rigged, just wise up.

I get the whole "addiction" thing I really do, but FFS you cant help some people who refuse to hear the "Penny Drop" even though that penny drops over and over again.

As soon as they are outlawed I will be the first one to say "We need to get rid of the Pokies", until then anyone stupid enough to donate to Hawks bottom line are ok by me.
What about social responsibility, corporate responsibility, government responsibility?

Why is it always the guy at the end that has to take all the responsibility?

Why to the billionaires say we should cut back our emissions while swanning around in private jets?

Why doesn't everyone have to take responsibility? Who looks after those who can't take responsibility for themselves?
 
What about social responsibility, corporate responsibility, government responsibility?

Why is it always the guy at the end that has to take all the responsibility?

Why to the billionaires say we should cut back our emissions while swanning around in private jets?

Why doesn't everyone have to take responsibility? Who looks after those who can't take responsibility for themselves?
Those of the dark triad won't just give them up. It's not in their nature.
 
Why doesn't everyone have to take responsibility? Who looks after those who can't take responsibility for themselves?

The government does that mate...oh wait, I forgot they are only interesting in doing things which ensure their re-election.
 
Some people are just wired that way. You think you’re saving them by believing that Hawthorn should pull out of poker machines. You think if you got rid of pokies then they would be better off. Not so, they’ll find something else to throw their money away on. It is how it is. Some people are just ******* hopeless with money and don’t know how to keep it.

Preventive policing. Stop everyone because some abuse it.
 
What about social responsibility, corporate responsibility, government responsibility?

Why is it always the guy at the end that has to take all the responsibility?

Why to the billionaires say we should cut back our emissions while swanning around in private jets?

Why doesn't everyone have to take responsibility? Who looks after those who can't take responsibility for themselves?

Human resources.
It's not about looking to blame someone.
It's about not being the one to blame.
 
Some people are just wired that way. You think you’re saving them by believing that Hawthorn should pull out of poker machines. You think if you got rid of pokies then they would be better off. Not so, they’ll find something else to throw their money away on. It is how it is. Some people are just ******* hopeless with money and don’t know how to keep it.
Nope, pokies are deliberately designed to be addictive and the bulk of profits comes from problem gamblers.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top