Media The Problem with the Gold City Royals....

Remove this Banner Ad

Dictionary meaning.

Royal: noun
plural noun: royals
  1. 1.
    INFORMAL
    a member of the royal family.
    "the royals are coming under the TV microscope"

SFA meaning..

Gold City Royals: noun

1. Insular inbreds.

For quite some time now I have had to sit back as a member of the Baghdad Bombers and watch as the SFA pour scorn on our brand, how we go about things and how we are a blight on the league. While I enjoy this side of the SFA and actively encourage it I sense one team has for too long gotten by purely on past reputation and goodwill.

Today KohPhi Antonio BlueVein TheCoach16 and myself would like to put the spot light well and truly on the Royals in an attempt to put some fact around the current fiction. We have concluded quite possibly the greatest ever "investigative journalism" the SFA has ever seen.

Many suggest the Bombers are insular and full of in jokes. To be fair when we compare this to the Royals we are well and truly left behind. Let's take a look at the current list.

Season 29 Players List

04137562. Marlowe
007. GreyCrow (LG)
1. Smartys Power
2. Paddles_
3. Kapow!!!
4. BRAB
5. ShaunDuggan
6. HawkPatrol
7. Cesoir
8. Easty
12. Ulahoopski
13. Noobz0r (LG)
17. boondy
18. spookism
22. Kennedy Parker (VC)
23. The Filth Wizard (C)
23.5 MrPremiership
30. grumbleguts
31. Blacky (LG)
42. brahj
50. NTRabbit
51. CakeEater (LG)
69. miggs
97. Dennis Confetti
TBC. The acurate one

Of a list that has 25 posters, by our reckoning at least 12 are BC members and we are being conservative. Almost half of the list. Talk about insular. So what I hear you say. The point is the Bombers are often criticised for being too close yet this side is basically made up of all the same. It’s worth pointing out that the 12 or so BC members are basically the only really active posters. So that makes it even more insular. They are basically a Facebook team that reluctantly add some inactive posters to their list, so they can qualify to play in the SFA.

We read with interest the other day The Filth Wizard talking about his views on team PM's and rookies. Apparently the Royal's do not believe in team PM's.

I don't believe in them because I believe they promote an insular nature and contribute to lack of match thread activity. These are Sweet FA teams, not private groups of friends. It's not uncommon, though not the same in every case, that teams with full club PM's engage less elsewhere. It is 100% fact though that every team that has ever boycotted a match has had a team PM. I've never felt the urge to start a team PM stated The Filth Wizard


This post dripped with irony.

Wow, I wonder what having a BC PM contributes to? If I was a Royals rookie I doubt I would ever feel part of this clique? I recall when cadsky approached me wanting to leave the Royals this was a key reason. Did not feel a part of the team.

So what is the lesson here. Don't have a team PM because that would be far too inclusive, instead continue with all the in jokes and chat in your 1,600 pages of Facebook discussion? What better way for new posters to feel welcome and a big part of the team.

Anyway, we look forward to some genuine discussion about this problem. No doubt interlaced with "nice melt" and "rentfree" retorts. Quite clearly the arse slapping, gym locker room style culture needs to change. any wonder there are no female posters on the list!

Whatever the discussion ends up with, this thread clearly proves a major ongoing issue at the Royals that continues to conveniently be swept under the carpet.
 
FFS Tony Lynn 15 do the furies have to do everything???

Question: What is wrong with the Royals?

Answer: they are boring as * and suck arse at qooty



Done. Close thread
 

Log in to remove this ad.

  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
FFS Tony Lynn 15 do the furies have to do everything???

Question: What is wrong with the Royals?

Answer: they are boring as fu** and suck arse at qooty



Done. Close thread

We are actually trying to help them with this.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
Another Bomber started thread about me and my team?

Is it my birthday?

Interesting reply. Further highlighting the issue. This is actually about the Royals. It isn't all about you.
 
Interesting reply. Further highlighting the issue. This is actually about the Royals. It isn't all about you.

I like how you highlighted the issue but failed to highlight the words "and my team".
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Of a list that has 25 posters, by our reckoning at least 12 are BC members and we are being conservative. Almost half of the list. Talk about insular. So what I hear you say. The point is the Bombers are often criticised for being too close yet this side is basically made up of all the same. It’s worth pointing out that the 12 or so BC members are basically the only really active posters. So that makes it even more insular. They are basically a Facebook team that reluctantly add some inactive posters to their list, so they can qualify to play in the SFA.
Go on the record and name them.
 
Another Bomber started thread about me and my team?

Is it my birthday?
I've started a line of Meat Shield Clothing;
The Filth Wizard I would like to give you a steak hoodie for trial and subsequent endorsement of this prime 'A' quality product and fashion statement

1590647290606.png
 
Dictionary meaning.

Royal: noun
plural noun: royals
  1. 1.
    INFORMAL
    a member of the royal family.
    "the royals are coming under the TV microscope"

SFA meaning..

Gold City Royals: noun

1. Insular inbreds.

For quite some time now I have had to sit back as a member of the Baghdad Bombers and watch as the SFA pour scorn on our brand, how we go about things and how we are a blight on the league. While I enjoy this side of the SFA and actively encourage it I sense one team has for too long gotten by purely on past reputation and goodwill.

Today KohPhi Antonio BlueVein TheCoach16 and myself would like to put the spot light well and truly on the Royals in an attempt to put some fact around the current fiction. We have concluded quite possibly the greatest ever "investigative journalism" the SFA has ever seen.

Many suggest the Bombers are insular and full of in jokes. To be fair when we compare this to the Royals we are well and truly left behind. Let's take a look at the current list.

Season 29 Players List

04137562. Marlowe
007. GreyCrow (LG)
1. Smartys Power
2. Paddles_
3. Kapow!!!
4. BRAB
5. ShaunDuggan
6. HawkPatrol
7. Cesoir
8. Easty
12. Ulahoopski
13. Noobz0r (LG)
17. boondy
18. spookism
22. Kennedy Parker (VC)
23. The Filth Wizard (C)
23.5 MrPremiership
30. grumbleguts
31. Blacky (LG)
42. brahj
50. NTRabbit
51. CakeEater (LG)
69. miggs
97. Dennis Confetti
TBC. The acurate one

Of a list that has 25 posters, by our reckoning at least 12 are BC members and we are being conservative. Almost half of the list. Talk about insular. So what I hear you say. The point is the Bombers are often criticised for being too close yet this side is basically made up of all the same. It’s worth pointing out that the 12 or so BC members are basically the only really active posters. So that makes it even more insular. They are basically a Facebook team that reluctantly add some inactive posters to their list, so they can qualify to play in the SFA.

We read with interest the other day The Filth Wizard talking about his views on team PM's and rookies. Apparently the Royal's do not believe in team PM's.

I don't believe in them because I believe they promote an insular nature and contribute to lack of match thread activity. These are Sweet FA teams, not private groups of friends. It's not uncommon, though not the same in every case, that teams with full club PM's engage less elsewhere. It is 100% fact though that every team that has ever boycotted a match has had a team PM. I've never felt the urge to start a team PM stated The Filth Wizard


This post dripped with irony.

Wow, I wonder what having a BC PM contributes to? If I was a Royals rookie I doubt I would ever feel part of this clique? I recall when cadsky approached me wanting to leave the Royals this was a key reason. Did not feel a part of the team.

So what is the lesson here. Don't have a team PM because that would be far too inclusive, instead continue with all the in jokes and chat in your 1,600 pages of Facebook discussion? What better way for new posters to feel welcome and a big part of the team.

Anyway, we look forward to some genuine discussion about this problem. No doubt interlaced with "nice melt" and "rentfree" retorts. Quite clearly the arse slapping, gym locker room style culture needs to change. any wonder there are no female posters on the list!

Whatever the discussion ends up with, this thread clearly proves a major ongoing issue at the Royals that continues to conveniently be swept under the carpet.
Active BC Members:

TFW
Noobz
spook
Blacky
brahj
ShaunDuggan

Inactive / Former Members
miggs
Paddles

Close, but no cigar Tones.
 
There are 5 active BC members on that Royals list.
I like how you highlighted the issue but failed to highlight the words "and my team".
Two or three.
Go on the record and name them.
Active BC Members:

TFW
Noobz
spook
Blacky
brahj
ShaunDuggan

Inactive / Former Members
miggs
Paddles

Close, but no cigar Tones.

Whoa guys, ease up. There is clearly a problem that all of you are too close to. Clear heads are needed here.
 
Spook is higher than brahj?
Oh, was I meant to be ranking them?

Active Members:

TFW
brahj
Blacky
Noobz
ShaunDuggan

Inactive / Former Members:
miggs
Paddles




































spookism
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top