Conspiracy Theory 9/11 - Part 3

What's your opinion regarding the 9/11 attacks?

  • The official story makes the most sense

    Votes: 48 40.7%

  • The attacks were allowed to happen

    Votes: 28 23.7%

  • Inside job by US/shadow Government

    Votes: 42 35.6%
  • Total voters
    118

Remove this Banner Ad

Procrastinator35 said:


One of the best vids there is on the 9/11 Deception....Experts in all their fields. including Emeritus Professors, pull apart the govt lies, one by one

See @ 1.20.15 for the missile striking the Pentagon.
Click to expand...


But what do they put there in place of the "lies"?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Question for those who have looked at this far closer than me.

I get you can poke plenty of holes in the official story, but I don’t get what that’s supposed to tell you.

If you needed to stage a terror attack as a pretence for war in the Middle East, just flying two planes into the towers was enough.

You don’t need to hit the Pentagon with a missile or lie about flight 93 or bring down WTC 7 or even bring down the twin towers with controlled explosions. Let them stand.

Just two planes into the twin towers which remain standing is enough justification to go into Afghanistan.

All the other elements provide little to no marginal benefit to the false flag and the complexity and risk in pulling all those other things off is insanely high.

It just doesn’t stack up to me but I’m interested if there’s a logical explanation for the motive for needing to pull off all these other bits that I may not be aware of.
 
GuzzLG said:
Question for those who have looked at this far closer than me.

I get you can poke plenty of holes in the official story, but I don’t get what that’s supposed to tell you.

If you needed to stage a terror attack as a pretense for war in the Middle East, just flying two planes into the towers was enough.

You don’t need to hit the Pentagon with a missile or lie about flight 93 or bring down WTC 7 or even bring down the twin towers with controlled explosions. Let them stand.

Just two planes into the twin towers which remain standing is enough justification to go into Afghanistan.

All the other elements provide little to no marginal benefit to the false flag and the complexity and risk in pulling all those other things off is insanely high.

It just doesn’t stack up to me but I’m interested if there’s a logical explanation for the motive for needing to pull off all these other bits that I may not be aware of.
Click to expand...

The Pentagon strike was directed at the auditors investigating it's missing trillions, alone.....The missile killed most of them, the day after Rumsfeld's announcement of their investigation.....Co-incidence?....You be the judge.

It also served to re-enforce a point of difference in it being a direct attack on the U.S defense center, thereby strengthening the case for return aggression in the manner of a war.

WTC7 served as the control-center for the implosion of the Twin Towers - before it too had to be detonated in order to destroy the evidence......It also housed the main offices of the SEC, who were investigating the biggest insider-trading fraud of all the big boys involved in 9/11, in U.S history.

The Shanksville farce merely provided for a Red-Herring & some padding for the 'terrorist narrative' for all to swallow....Too bad the Cleveland Ohio mayor & the Chief fire-fighter at Shanksville - on the day - poured cold water all over that fraud.
 
Procrastinator35 said:
The Pentagon strike was directed at the auditors investigating it's missing trillions, alone.....The missile killed most of them, the day after Rumsfeld's announcement of their investigation.....Co-incidence?....You be the judge.

It also served to re-enforce a point of difference in it being a direct attack on the U.S defense center, thereby strengthening the case for return aggression in the manner of a war.

WTC7 served as the control-center for the implosion of the Twin Towers - before it too had to be detonated in order to destroy the evidence......It also housed the main offices of the SEC, who were investigating the biggest insider-trading fraud of all the big boys involved in 9/11, in U.S history.

The Shanksville farce merely provided for a Red-Herring & some padding for the 'terrorist narrative' for all to swallow....Too bad the Cleveland Ohio mayor & the Chief fire-fighter at Shanksville - on the day - poured cold water all over that fraud.
Click to expand...
Appreciate the response.

But what about the effort of actually rigging both towers and bringing them down?

Just hitting them with planes and leaving them standing not enough? Maybe they worked backwards? Wanted to bring them down and came up with the plane idea afterwards as the distraction/cover/sleight of hand?
 
Last edited:
GuzzLG said:
Appreciate the response.

But what about the effort of actually rigging both towers and bringing them down?

Just hitting them with planes not enough?
Click to expand...

The twin Towers were specifically designed to withstand such a scenario, of a jumbo crashing into them....Owing to their height, they had to be.

You'd have to sheer all 52 central steel core columns simultaneously in order to bring them down. & on every floor to boot.

The fact is that all 110 4inch thick concrete floors - of both buildings - simply melted away in a pyroclastic flow.....The heat required for that to occur would have had to be thermo-nuclear in scope & power.....Military grade Nano-thermite granules were found in all the melted steel particles.
 
Procrastinator35 said:
The twin Towers were specifically designed to withstand such a scenario, of a jumbo crashing into them....Owing to their height, they had to be.

You'd have to sheer all 52 central steel core columns simultaneously in order to bring them down. & on every floor to boot.

The fact is tht all 110 4inch thick concrete floors - of both buildings - simply melted away in a pyroclastic flow.....The heat required for that to occur would have had to be thermo-nuclear in scope & power.....Military grade Nano-thermite granules were found in all the melted steel particles.
Click to expand...
I grant you all that.

But still begs the question why did they need to be brought down? You’ve already flown planes into them and have your cover for war, Patriot Act, etc.

Or if you’ve gone that far why not go further?
 
Last edited:
GuzzLG said:
I grant you all that.

But still begs the question why did they need to be brought down? You’ve already flown planes into them and have your cover for war, Patriot Act, etc.
Click to expand...

Those 2 planes that hit those towers were directed at very specific targets.....The computer centers of the 2 main company's involved in the joint SEC investigations into the insider trading I spoke about earlier.

George Bush's brother Marvin's company had the contract on the Twin Towers security.....They had also been insured a mere 1 month prior - by Larry Silverstein - against 'terrorist' attacks.....When all these pre-emptive co-incidences just keep on adding up - then it's time to start questioning the official narrative.
 
GuzzLG said:
I grant you all that.

But still begs the question why did they need to be brought down? You’ve already flown planes into them and have your cover for war, Patriot Act, etc.

Or if you’ve gone that far why not go further?
Click to expand...
This is a good point, as the planes crashing into them would have been a good enough excuse for war, maybe? Maybe cool heads would have overruled and Patriot Act may not have been approved. And would permission be given to go to war against Afghanistan in retaliation, a country that really had nothing to do with the story of 19 Saudi men hijacking 4 planes, be given?

But the fear increased 20 fold with the collapse, and many times more than that for the death toll!
 
Last edited:
BlueE said:
This is a good point, as the planes crashing into them would have been a good enough excuse for war, maybe? Maybe cool heads would have overruled and Patriot Act may not have been approved. And would permission be given to go to war against Afghanistan in retaliation, a country that really had nothing to do with the story of 19 Saudi men hijacking 4 planes, may not have been given.

But the fear increased 20 fold with the collapse, as did the death toll!
Click to expand...

The symbolism of the Twin Towers & all they stood for, was also a huge factor......The entire world was in shock & caught completely off-guard by it.....This enabled the men behind it to use that time to act quickly, by installing their pre-emptive narrative.

as PNAC itself noted....What was required in order to usher in it's Middle East policy ,was A catalytic event on the scale of A new 'Pearl-Harbor'.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Procrastinator35 said:
The Pentagon strike was directed at the auditors investigating it's missing trillions, alone.....The missile killed most of them, the day after Rumsfeld's announcement of their investigation.....Co-incidence?....You be the judge.

It also served to re-enforce a point of difference in it being a direct attack on the U.S defense center, thereby strengthening the case for return aggression in the manner of a war.

WTC7 served as the control-center for the implosion of the Twin Towers - before it too had to be detonated in order to destroy the evidence......It also housed the main offices of the SEC, who were investigating the biggest insider-trading fraud of all the big boys involved in 9/11, in U.S history.

The Shanksville farce merely provided for a Red-Herring & some padding for the 'terrorist narrative' for all to swallow....Too bad the Cleveland Ohio mayor & the Chief fire-fighter at Shanksville - on the day - poured cold water all over that fraud.
Click to expand...
Simples.

 
It is interesting listening to Bush bumble his way trying to explain what occurred on 9/11, 19 years after the event. In a recent interview I recall briefly watching as he almost admitted it was a conspiracy. It appears to me that the role of President is ceremonial, to appease the masses that can be bothered enough to vote. Carter promised he would reveal the truth about aliens, but back tracked when he got into office. Then we have the legendary story of Nixon taking his closest friend Jackie Gleason to see the bodies of aliens.

"I’ll never forget the night in 1973 my famous husband came home, slumped white-faced in an armchair and spilled out the incredible story to me," the story read. Apparently arranged for Gleason to be escorted through Homestead Air Force Base in Florida to view four little embalmed aliens, "with small bald heads and disproportionately large ears."

The story was released by the National Enquirer so its basis has to be questioned, but interestingly never dismissed, disputed or just laughed off.

Then the biggest liar since Nixon, Bill Clinton, who has famously stated that he has openly asked the Airforce whether the US Govt has recovered any alien bodies from crash sites or is dealing with aliens. They refused to tell him. They probably found him a couple of young girls to keep him happy.

Obama refused to trust the CIA and would not even attend their morning briefings because he believed that he was being fed a crock of lies. Eventually he got into bed with them after they gave him Bin Laden's head on a plate.

Hoover conned his way into being the head of the FBI and with the secrets he acquired over 50 years black mailed every President until he eventually died. Eisenhower gave the biggest warning to the world in his final speech before leaving office, but nobody was listening. Did Eisenhower inadvertently create a monster when he formed the Majestic Group?

So who runs America? Who are the faceless bureaucrats who are 'above top secret' and have access to information the President does not even have access to? Did these faceless bureaucrats organize 9/11? Who could have conveniently arranged for New York & Washington to be hopelessly exposed as it was on 9/11? Who would have had the resources and expertise to have the building 'pulled'? It wasn't Bush he is just too stupid to have planned this. Cheney on the other hand is a viper....

I recall Jesse Ventura telling an interesting story. After he had been elected Governor of Minnesota, he was paid a visit by three men representing the 'Federal Government'. They wanted to know how he won office. What did he do, what tactics did he employ, how much money did he spend etc etc. They could not understand how someone with little resources could become Governor. When Jesse told them to politely f*** off, their demeanor changed and became far more threatening and they made it clear that they wanted his co-operation. I remember Jesse saying that he thought they were going to kill him.

Why would the CIA get involved in what a Governor from Minnesota was doing or how he got elected? Perhaps they were getting ready for something bigger....like Trump? A perfect President. Does not ask questions, never reads a new book, never thinks a new thought, only interested in his vanity and lies as it suits him.
 
Shark882008 said:
No planes hit the towers that day. Let’s use the rona as the playbook. 911 is well before it’s time , no social media / no eyes picking apart the narrative. Yes we all saw the plane hit the second tower live, but those planes were cgied into the live feed broadcast imo. Eye witness accounts of planes striking are just crisis actors, before people new what the term crisis actors meant.
Click to expand...

This is Thunka-hunka levels of delusion & fantasy.
 
Shark882008 said:


Watch that video Slowed down in the slowest speed.
You can’t possibly tell me that is a real plane slicing and disappearing into that steel building. So either CNN are faking something , or there is something more sinister at play.
Click to expand...


They're military mock-up planes that were re-enforced structurally - especially in the nose cone.....Crashing through the 2 points of both towers, that had been previously 'fire-proofed' - Read Weakened - so as to enable easier & better penetration.

Both planes were also equipped with a war-head missile beneath their fuselage, fired a split-second before impact....YOu can see the flash on both prior to impact....To enable better penetration & clear the way.

They were both flown by remote-control.....You can't CGI planes to eye-witnesses on the ground dude...That's absurd & ridiculous to say so, much less think it.

Many independent observers caught it on their own video tapes, after the first one struck....To suggest they're all CGI is beyond stupid.
 
Last edited:
Procrastinator35 said:
They're military mock-up planes that were re-enforced structurally - especially in the nose cone.....Crashing through the 2 points of both towers, that had been previously 'fire-proofed' - Read Weakened - so as to enable easier & better penetration.

Both planes were also equipped with a war-head missile beneath their fuselage, fired a split-second before impact....YOu can see the flash on both prior to impact....To enable better penetration & clear the way.

They were both flown by remote-control.....You can't CGI planes to eye-witnesses on the ground dude...That's absurd & ridiculous to say so, much less think it.

Many independent observers caught it on their own video tapes, after the first one struck....To suggest they're all CGI is beyond stupid.
Click to expand...

There are conflicting videos though from eye witness accounts who are saying live on the ground, no planes but bombs.
That video I just linked though is cgi, 100%.
Look at the building in the background where the plane just magically glitches over the top of it like a crappy cgi overlay.
 
Procrastinator35 said:
The twin Towers were specifically designed to withstand such a scenario, of a jumbo crashing into them....Owing to their height, they had to be.

You'd have to sheer all 52 central steel core columns simultaneously in order to bring them down. & on every floor to boot.

The fact is that all 110 4inch thick concrete floors - of both buildings - simply melted away in a pyroclastic flow.....The heat required for that to occur would have had to be thermo-nuclear in scope & power.....Military grade Nano-thermite granules were found in all the melted steel particles.
Click to expand...

Stop saying Jumbo, a 707 ( which they were designed to withstand ) or a 767 ( which is actually similar for crash impact purposes ) are not , and have never been referred to as "Jumbo Jets ".

The impact of the aircraft did not cause the building to collapse.

No you would not need to sheer all 52 central steel core columns simultaneously.

There was no melting .

Since the original claim of Thermite, there have been multiple analysis' conducted on the "suspect" dust from the wtc. There aint no Thermite.
 
Procrastinator35 said:
They're military mock-up planes that were re-enforced structurally - especially in the nose cone.....Crashing through the 2 points of both towers, that had been previously 'fire-proofed' - Read Weakened - so as to enable easier & better penetration.

Both planes were also equipped with a war-head missile beneath their fuselage, fired a split-second before impact....YOu can see the flash on both prior to impact....To enable better penetration & clear the way.

They were both flown by remote-control.....You can't CGI planes to eye-witnesses on the ground dude...That's absurd & ridiculous to say so, much less think it.

Many independent observers caught it on their own video tapes, after the first one struck....To suggest they're all CGI is beyond stupid.
Click to expand...

You claimed that the buildings were brought down with thermite. Why then bother using military mock up planes?
 
Shark882008 said:
There are conflicting videos though from eye witness accounts who are saying live on the ground, no planes but bombs.
That video I just linked though is cgi, 100%.
Look at the building in the background where the plane just magically glitches over the top of it like a crappy cgi overlay.
Click to expand...

Lots of different independent vids from many different Angles, by eye-witnesses on the day....You do know how CGI works yeah?

Like I said to you from the beginning....This is thunka-hunka levels of stupid.
 
Shark882008 said:
So is the thought of a virus that magically hops off the tarmac at Tullamarine airport and magically spreads all over Melbourne but yet here we are 6 months later, 99 percent of the population do not think critically in the slightest.
Click to expand...

CGI virus , now you're onto something.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top