- Dec 27, 2016
- 27,900
- 58,668
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Moderator
- #31
Here is US Politics - Pt 1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 14
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
No, you clown. He gave the info to Putin who order the hits.
Is this schtick or stupidity?
It also ignore that some of his trials are for fraud as a private citizen - irrespective if he's a POTUS or not.
It's weird that some people think that (self proclaimed) billionaires should be above the law. I guess the 1% do need their simps.
Not just politicians, a fair few in this very thread.The fact that neither party will change the rules to prohibit Politicians from insider trading should tell you all you need to know about the Politicians think they are above the law.
Not just politicians, a fair few in this very thread.
Crimes in general - that was your point with that example yeah?Who is for insider trading in this thread?
...should tell you all you need to know about the Politicians think they are above the law.
So you're one of those conspiracy loons then?
The CIA are just pissed that Trump took them out in Syria. Who do you think was supplying the false bombing targets so that ISIS could thrive in Syria?This is from 2017:
Donald Trump's intelligence leak 'will get Americans killed'
Security experts raise concerns over fate of spy and future security relationshipswww.independent.co.uk
2020: Ignoring briefings
New York Times drops bombshell report: Trump remained silent as Putin paid to kill U.S. soldiers
Trump administration has refused to respond after learning Russia offered bounties for killing US troops: reportwww.salon.com
Russian sources disappeared after Trump declassified ex-spy’s evidence, UK court told
Former MI6 officer’s witness statement criticises ‘reckless’ publication of testimony about ex-president’s Russia linkswww.theguardian.com
Trump hobbling his own agencies:
And basically an admission from the CIA that Trump compromised them:
The CIA Reportedly Pulled Its Top Spy From Russia Because Trump Can't Keep His Mouth Shut
The president seems to keep mishandling highly sensitive national security information.www.gq.com
First President to withhold the classified documents that incriminates all your mates.A few other firsts missing from that list lol
First ex-prez to refuse to return classified docs when asked
First prez to try to overturn a democratic election
First prez to have a legal team so crap they forgot to request a jury trial
Still true as wellStill
First link he's accused of sharing intel re ISIS. That's why the terrorist group that the Obama admin said would remain an issue for 20 years+ was over within 6 months of the Trump admin m8. It's easy to get rid of the bad guys when that is your focus, rather than creating another taxpayer-funded proxy forever war over the airspace of a third party!This is from 2017:
Donald Trump's intelligence leak 'will get Americans killed'
Security experts raise concerns over fate of spy and future security relationshipswww.independent.co.uk
2020: Ignoring briefings
New York Times drops bombshell report: Trump remained silent as Putin paid to kill U.S. soldiers
Trump administration has refused to respond after learning Russia offered bounties for killing US troops: reportwww.salon.com
Russian sources disappeared after Trump declassified ex-spy’s evidence, UK court told
Former MI6 officer’s witness statement criticises ‘reckless’ publication of testimony about ex-president’s Russia linkswww.theguardian.com
Trump hobbling his own agencies:
And basically an admission from the CIA that Trump compromised them:
The CIA Reportedly Pulled Its Top Spy From Russia Because Trump Can't Keep His Mouth Shut
The president seems to keep mishandling highly sensitive national security information.www.gq.com
Still true as well
It also ignore that some of his trials are for fraud as a private citizen - irrespective if he's a POTUS or not.
It's weird that some people think that (self proclaimed) billionaires should be above the law. I guess the 1% do need their simps.
Most people would just assume Presidents already had immunity. From starting a war based on fake WMDs to Benghazi. US Presidents have got away with amazingly brazen things over time but now it's Trump. 'NO-ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!!
That Donnie, such a selfless operator. Putting himself through all this just so other ex-presidents can be tried and held accountable, and clearly nothing at all to do with him simply not wanting to be held to account himself for anything, ever - he's actually wanting his appeal to be knocked back, 4d cHeSs!! If you looked up 'good samaritan' in the dictionary I bet his picture would be there
Seriously mate, this would be well within in your top 5 all time complete loon theories, absolute gold
A false premise, above a false conclusion.Most people would just assume Presidents already had immunity. From starting a war based on fake WMDs to Benghazi. US Presidents have got away with amazingly brazen things over time but now it's Trump. 'NO-ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!!
Most of you here would have so much more credibility if you didn't turn a blind eye to anything that isn't Trump.
For everything? eg. ordering the assassination of a political opponent, as questioned by the initial judge? C'arn mate, not even you are cooked enough to be on board with this. You're also smart enough to understand why there isn't much appetite for charging ex-presidents with war crimes despite a few being deserving of such charges - bit easier to argue foreign policy/national security considerations than it is to argue "umm I just really wanted to still be POTUS".Most people would just assume Presidents already had immunity. From starting a war based on fake WMDs to Benghazi. US Presidents have got away with amazingly brazen things over time but now it's Trump. 'NO-ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!!
Most of you here would have so much more credibility if you didn't turn a blind eye to anything that isn't Trump.
Are we talking about the 'fraud' where the banks testified they lost nothing and actually made money on the deal and would happily do business with Trump again?A false premise, above a false conclusion.
Bush is absolutely a war criminal. Rumsfeld is functionally corrupt and should never have been allowed to live his pockets. Close to home, we have ex-pollies on both sides of the aisle taking up cushy positions in industries that were part of their own portfolios.
And anyone convicted of fraud should face the full consequences of their conviction.
Are we talking about the 'fraud' where the banks testified they lost nothing and actually made money on the deal and would happily do business with Trump again?
You are a great poster but jeez Trump is your blind spot.
I'm not sure if Malifice led you down this path but posting everything Trump or MAGA from Reddit or some obscure lefty darkweb site makes you seem more crazy than those you are trying to paint as crazy.
Pull back a bit. You're better than this...I hope.
If Trump has different policies and was honest we wouldn't be having this conversation.Are we talking about the 'fraud' where the banks testified they lost nothing and actually made money on the deal and would happily do business with Trump again?
You are a great poster but jeez Trump is your blind spot.
I'm not sure if Malifice led you down this path but posting everything Trump or MAGA from Reddit or some obscure lefty darkweb site makes you seem more crazy than those you are trying to paint as crazy.
Pull back a bit. You're better than this...I hope.
Yep, coz thats the only legal issue Trump has.Are we talking about the 'fraud' where the banks testified they lost nothing and actually made money on the deal and would happily do business with Trump again?
You are a great poster but jeez Trump is your blind spot.
I apologise if I haven't understood your position.If Trump has different policies and was honest we wouldn't be having this conversation.
If you take the Trump name out of it and change it to "US official wants immunity from a littany of charges" it changes nothing. Accountability is paramount.
Nobody should be above the law and this is not a partisan issue - I firmly believe that everybody should be accountable for the actions and if those actions are illegal, face the consequences of those actions. That includes officials at all levels of government in Australia.
You'll need to look at the SRP board for (example) ex Australian ministers taking positions in private companies. The Obeids are vile and were thankfully charged. As they should have been.I apologise if I haven't understood your position.
Can you link me to examples where you've called for Democrats or left-leaning politicians in Aus to be held accountable?
I apologise if I haven't understood your position.
Can you link me to examples where you've called for Democrats or left-leaning politicians in Aus to be held accountable?
No real argument on Hills, would be happy for her to be charged as well.
I would have been in that 56% thinking Hillary should have been charged too fwiw.
I apologise if I haven't understood your position.
Can you link me to examples where you've called for Democrats or left-leaning politicians in Aus to be held accountable?