Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Aren't you concerned that '40 young men' were able to find rape re enactments funny?Nope it’s still on the person who is offended. If you are one of them that is then that’s on you to deal with it. Just because you get offended by something doesn’t mean the whole world should get offended by it.
You got 40 odd young men all together, none of them were offended or cared. Why then is it others who care? 40 players is a big number of people not to care or find it offensive.
No they're banning players for re enacting rape for laughs. Keep up.Because they are banning players for PR like this yet continuing to take gambling companies money hand over fist despite the damage it does. The worst kind of hypocrites-worse than politicians. Just get out.
Would they have had this theme if WAGs had been present, and if not why not?Nope it’s still on the person who is offended. If you are one of them that is then that’s on you to deal with it. Just because you get offended by something doesn’t mean the whole world should get offended by it.
You got 40 odd young men all together, none of them were offended or cared. Why then is it others who care? 40 players is a big number of people not to care or find it offensive.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Can someone remind me what was Tyson Stengle's punishment for ingesting drugs and passing out in a nightclub?
Or is that acceptable?
Aren't you concerned that '40 young men' were able to find rape re enactments funny?
Bet ya none of the AFLW team gave a shit about it, until today
We get you don't like gambling companies but this isn't about them,are you trying to see how many times you can mention them in this thread?As long as the gambling companies are okay. That is the most important thing.
We need that strong relationship to encourage kids to become addicts.
I wonder what happens at cinemas.FWIW, I've worked at a venue that Carr has held shows at, and staff are notified beforehand of potentially offensive content and can withdraw their availability for the event if they want. (And same for any similar events.)
I suspect this is commonplace.
Would they have had this theme if WAGs had been present, and if not why not?
I wonder if a player went as a pokies addict and simulated committing suicide what sort of punishment would be handed out?Yeah trying to work out how Whitfield goes as a slave owner and gets away with a fine
You'd think gambling would be the antithesis of public morality, but...This isn't completely true for "public figures". They are treated differently under the legal system in these types of matters. Additionally, they would almost definitely have "public morality" clauses in their contracts.
Shitty thing is the AFL picks and chooses the public morality thing.
Straight to jail according to our newly appointed culture minister Andrew Dill-on
Which isn't okay. And when you have the opportunity to do something about it, you should.I’ve been around a bit mate, what happens when 40 odd young men get together drinking will never surprise me. Seen and head of far far worse than what we are talking about here.
Which isn't okay. And when you have the opportunity to do something about it, you should.
What was the AFL’s stance on Stengle being found paro outside the nightclub?Straight to jail according to our newly appointed culture minister Andrew Dill-on
It’s a relevant talking point though, just because you might not like it in the discussion.We get you don't like gambling companies but this isn't about them,are you trying to see how many times you can mention them in this thread?
We get you don't like gambling companies but this isn't about them,are you trying to see how many times you can mention them in this thread?
Going a bit too hard in the disco isn't very flattering but it's also not particularly offensive. On the other hand, simulating a sexual assault with a blow up doll is actually just a little bit offensive.Can someone remind me what was Tyson Stengle's punishment for ingesting drugs and passing out in a nightclub?
They're not making fun of themselves. They're making fun of victims of sexual abuse.Its 100% ok if they are not breaking the law and just dressing up making fools of themselves/.
Going a bit too hard in the disco isn't very flattering but it's also not particularly offensive. On the other hand, simulating a sexual assault with a blow up doll is actually just a little bit offensive.
Do you see the difference?