Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The Official Camry Crows in Season Lolz Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nelso
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The old "free" membership really is a funny one.

From memory the AFL only includes memberships over the value of $50 and excluding pets in their offical membership figures. Just had a quick flick through WCE membership packages. They have a $50 membership that doesn't include any games, yet offers basically the same features as Adelaide's free membership. I have no idea how many people actually sign up for this package, but hey, Adelaide are bad because they actually offer something of benefit without charge. Go figure

I might check out a few more clubs membership packages and see if this is a common offering .. lol


A supporter of the team with the biggest loss of members due to them not meeting the criteria to count as a membership because of digital memberships is having a go at this?


This a very strange tact.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

A supporter of the team with the biggest loss of members due to them not meeting the criteria to count as a membership because of digital memberships is having a go at this?
This a very strange tact.
Port charge $85 and same are counted in Membership figures by the AFL.
Crows have digital Members who cant be counted as Members by the AFL. But hey, they have all these members, even a few named Adolf.
Crows don't even check names ... and there are some funny ones there.
 
A supporter of the team with the biggest loss of members due to them not meeting the criteria to count as a membership because of digital memberships is having a go at this?


This a very strange tact.

You’re giving them way too much credit if you think they are have any self awareness
 
A supporter of the team with the biggest loss of members due to them not meeting the criteria to count as a membership because of digital memberships is having a go at this?


This a very strange tact.
Really, why..?

Clearly Adelaide are providing similar value to "members" that some clubs choose to charge for. Funnily enough these "memberships" just breach the $50 threshold required by the AFL to be included in offical memberships numbers. Yet they still don't provide access to any games .. ****en lol

I actually think Adelaide are providing a much higher degree of transparency in regard to compiling member numbers. The club is completely aware of the fact that the free memberships and the benefits offered are not included in the offical AFL figures.

Yet some clubs offer no game memberships, at a cost. They pay the club money in the first instance. They then are eligible for a modest discount at a club owned venue on food purchases. However alcohol is still charged at "the clubs" market rate. And then we need to consider that the venue offers poker machines. Another family club, promoting gambling to its fans. This to me reeks of a club completely bereft of any ethical behaviour.

Personally, I am a fan of offical membership numbers only counted for full 11 game members. Funnily enough the last time I suggested this I was shot down. But hey .. who cares, I don't really perceive total membership numbers as dick measuring contest with other clubs .. after all, some clubs have become extremely creative at inflating their numbers

Anyway, the club I support posted quite a large profit over the last operating period which included the writing off a $1.2M debt.

Did the club you support, with its dodgy $85 no game memberships, and $90 dollar club conventions post a profit?

You think the free memberships are a joke. I couldn't give a ****, I genuinely don't care. When the club is engaged in business discussions the numbers purely relate to the people that they can engage with on a regular basis. So once again, thank you for choosing to become a digital/free member of the club I support .. :rainbow:
 
Really, why..?

Clearly Adelaide are providing similar value to "members" that some clubs choose to charge for. Funnily enough these "memberships" just breach the $50 threshold required by the AFL to be included in offical memberships numbers. Yet they still don't provide access to any games .. ****en lol

I actually think Adelaide are providing a much higher degree of transparency in regard to compiling member numbers. The club is completely aware of the fact that the free memberships and the benefits offered are not included in the offical AFL figures.

Yet some clubs offer no game memberships, at a cost. They pay the club money in the first instance. They then are eligible for a modest discount at a club owned venue on food purchases. However alcohol is still charged at "the clubs" market rate. And then we need to consider that the venue offers poker machines. Another family club, promoting gambling to its fans. This to me reeks of a club completely bereft of any ethical behaviour.

Personally, I am a fan of offical membership numbers only counted for full 11 game members. Funnily enough the last time I suggested this I was shot down. But hey .. who cares, I don't really perceive total membership numbers as dick measuring contest with other clubs .. after all, some clubs have become extremely creative at inflating their numbers

Anyway, the club I support posted quite a large profit over the last operating period which included the writing off a $1.2M debt.

Did the club you support, with its dodgy $85 no game memberships, and $90 dollar club conventions post a profit?

You think the free memberships are a joke. I couldn't give a ****, I genuinely don't care. When the club is engaged in business discussions the numbers purely relate to the people that they can engage with on a regular basis. So once again, thank you for choosing to become a digital/free member of the club I support .. :rainbow:

Lol
 

Remove this Banner Ad

My study is on your social deficiency not his.
Study .....hahahahaha
What a crock of shit

Haven’t heard this big a lie since OneGreatBullshitter and Smellso the Welch lied about going to China !

Study
01C23F79-5EE1-4BCF-A588-558AFBF38CB2.gif
 
I actually think Adelaide are providing a much higher degree of transparency in regard to compiling member numbers. The club is completely aware of the fact that the free memberships and the benefits offered are not included in the offical AFL figures.


Hahaha, why do they parade around the inflated number everywhere pretending they have 90k members?
 
You think the free memberships are a joke. I couldn't give a ****, I genuinely don't care. When the club is engaged in business discussions the numbers purely relate to the people that they can engage with on a regular basis. So once again, thank you for choosing to become a digital/free member of the club I support .. :rainbow:


I didn't but Fages did.

notso.jpg notso.jpg
 
Hahaha, why do they parade around the inflated number everywhere pretending they have 90k members?

Not sure, but the strategy seems to be working as we posted a very healthy profit and became debt free in a terrible year for the club.
You guys had all the pre-season recruiting hype, China and Kochead spouting off about you everywhere, so how was your financial result? Smaller than Koch's understanding of football.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I LOL'ed too. Bloody embarrassing wasn't it. BTW...Scott Gullan is an award-winning sports writer for Melbourne’s Herald Sun. He has covered athletics at the Goodwill, Commonwealth and Olympic Games. Scott is the author of Cathy: Her Own Story and Greatness about the Geelong football club.

Well, if he's that good, you would think he could back up his statements instead of just putting a comment out there for the bay 13 desperates!!!
 
Not sure, but the strategy seems to be working as we posted a very healthy profit and became debt free in a terrible year for the club.
You guys had all the pre-season recruiting hype, China and Kochead spouting off about you everywhere, so how was your financial result? Smaller than Koch's understanding of football.


That profit must feel good all the way down there in 12th after making the grand final the year before. Must really sleep well at night knowing that rather than spend money to make the club more competetive, or shock horror on decent fitness and conditioning staff, your management was sitting on funds so they could say, "Hey look, at least we made a profit!"


****ing LOL.
 
That profit must feel good all the way down there in 12th after making the grand final the year before. Must really sleep well at night knowing that rather than spend money to make the club more competetive, or shock horror on decent fitness and conditioning staff, your management was sitting on funds so they could say, "Hey look, at least we made a profit!"


******* LOL.

Pea Heart Cotchin just looks at these spuds going lol we got this


d4d629780fbab2b3c4d062941011fb96
 
Last edited:
Look, you KKKK,* AKA Add-der-laide sycophants and snowflakes, you can froth all you like, but the crux of the matter is: - Adelaide fudged the numbers last year. I know it's an inconvenient truth, but even the most KKKK fawning parasites amongst you can grasp that simple fact. Surely! LOL!
*Kamry Krows Keyboard Kowards
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom