Garlett, Ed, Gibbon, Phillips and Cuningham will all be replace as better oppotions are available . We need patience another 4 to 5 weeks to get the balance right. Most teams are in the same position.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Adelaide v Carlton - Rd 5 - 7:10PM Thu
Squiggle tips Crows at 82% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 5 Games
Soccer Notice Image
FA Cup Semi-Finals ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ Europa - Rd of 16 ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - KNOCKOUTS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ Champs League - League Phase ⚽
Garlett, Ed, Gibbon, Phillips and Cuningham will all be replace as better oppotions are available . We need patience another 4 to 5 weeks to get the balance right. Most teams are in the same position.
Cunners is now best 22.Not going anywhwre,Gibbons way too early to tell,the others yes.Garlett, Ed, Gibbon, Phillips and Cuningham will all be replace as better oppotions are available . We need patience another 4 to 5 weeks to get the balance right. Most teams are in the same position.
seriously......Garlett, Ed, Gibbon, Phillips and Cuningham will all be replace as better oppotions are available . We need patience another 4 to 5 weeks to get the balance right. Most teams are in the same position.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Ed ended up with 25 possessions and 12 marks on the weekend - I think your may not understand what he is being asked to do.
DE of 72% & 8 score involvements suggest this isn't the case. He had 6 turnovers.unfortunately 20 of those disposals ended up in the hands of players wearing yellow and black. To indecisive, had the ball twice knowing he couldn't make the 40m journey and held on to it for too long.
I agree I probably dont understand what he is being asked to do - but I am guessing it includes distributing the ball to forward's advantage and maybe kicking a goal or two himself - Ed was a rabbit in spotlights on too many occasions against richmond and his JLT 'form' playing that role was no better. Would prefer to see him get his 25 possessions in the middle and give off to blokes who know how to kick the ball into forward fifty better than he can. Butchered two easy goal set ups - can't afford that type of execution from a senior player in a developing team and hope to win games. Same for Garlett a fish out of water in defense atm - places unnecessary pressure on his team mates who have to cover for him and then recover from execution errors when he has the ball. As for Phillips - if he cant play 85% time on field and keep up running with an average runner in Nankervis and positions himself badly in defense when he does get there x3 goals - he is a liability in a developing side- may as well be playing TDK for development time (sadly he is now injured). Gibbons is a nice debut 'story' rah rah - where are the goals where are the tackles and turnovers and pressure? Sorry not good enough fella.
So more than Melbourne, North, Eagles, Crows and * and not far off Swans, Pies & Cats....We scored 64 points!!!!!
Gotta trust the forwards in a one-on-one. That should be the message to the mids this week. If Harry or Gov or Charlie or Fas has a defender isolated, pull the trigger. Of the possible results - we mark, we win a free, we halve the contest, we lose possession - I'll take three out of the four. Good odds.
8 score involvements out of 19 scoring shots isn't good enough for you?
I'm a huge Ed fan buddy - always have been -- even when he was a punching bag on here years ago - I knew he value to the side was his gut running and ability to shut players down - if he had even average kicking and hand balling skill he would have been AA years ago. Fact is Bolton is playing to is weaknesses right now trying to engineer him into something Ed can't be consistently good at doing.
Anyway my player comments in this thread are about what will work against us in the coming port game - no comments on the rest of my observations in context of the Port game I see. 4-5 players not working well is a huge load for the rest to carry - not rocket science to figure out likely outcome.
Since you like to use stats - consider this - base don most stats that shoudl have been a 1-3 goal game maximum between the sides- but it wasn't. Ask yourself why?
Richmond game showed massive improvement in running power for the side- but it all showed up the fact that if you don't take your chances you are just running hard with no reward - skill execution not effort lost the game against Richmond and skill execution comes down to who is playing in what position and can they handle it or not.
My points are about structural set ups and skill execution. This year we should expect to see much better two way running but if execution doesn't improve- we wont win many games at all and we might lose games that we looked like we were on top for 4 quarters as well.
Go and have a look at the clearance stats for round 1 2018 and compare them to round 1 2019 and you will see what Bolton is doing. It isn't about pushing Ed down it is about raising others up. It isn't about the here and now but the next decade.
But again, Ed made mistakes but he got plenty of the ball, his 12 marks indicate he presented well, and the was involved in close to half our scores - there is something to build on going forward.
If this position is going to be a long-term thing (and Ed is mostly bloody good at it, aside from moving the ball inside 50), our mids need to be there for the handball receive after he marks it.
Looking at guys like Fisher, SPS, Cuningham, Setterfield, Walsh, Murphy, etc.
8 score involvements out of 19 scoring shots isn't good enough for you?
Go and have a look at the clearance stats for round 1 2018 and compare them to round 1 2019 and you will see what Bolton is doing. It isn't about pushing Ed down it is about raising others up. It isn't about the here and now but the next decade.
But again, Ed made mistakes but he got plenty of the ball, his 12 marks indicate he presented well, and the was involved in close to half our scores - there is something to build on going forward.
We scored 64 points!!!!!
This. He's not a defender. Its like trying to put a square peg in a round hole.
"Ed works well enough to get the ball" is your insight and my observation is "he doesn't know what to do with it when he does get it". However wot about the other three ( again) you are silent about - how many 'experiments' for future can a side handle before it all becomes a silly mess and (again) my point is the coming game against Port....
Give him a chance. Still young and inexperienced and in a new role at Carlton. Shown good signs and it’s amazing what some confidence and experience can do. His opponent was quiet as well.
Only 29 games in 4 seasons.
Did i watch a different game live and on replay? Garlett wasn't even that bad, didn't get involved much but neither did his opponent...not like he got 5 kicked on him.
Can't really recall any big mistakes to warrant people saying that he's 'not good enough as a defender'.
One other thing that was frustrating(and has been an issue for a couple of years) is our forwards being too unselfish and not pinging a shot. It happened at least three or four times this week. Back yourselves.
