I think for too long we've been too nice in list management. We've kept guys around for far too long based on the on paper benefits, and the idea that "if they can just get a run at this they'll pay off" type of mindset. Several guys who have played for a long time seemingly promise a lot but deliver minimal.
We at least started to move on some of these types last yr, but realistically it's a good 2 years too late. Yeah, the 3 or 4 games a year where they actually do the thing everyone says they're capable of are great, but they aren't enough to build a team around. Despite that, we still persisted despite being repeatedly let down.
A stronger team would've set the standards and made the cuts early, instead we've let them embed into our culture and become senior players.
We at least started to move on some of these types last yr, but realistically it's a good 2 years too late. Yeah, the 3 or 4 games a year where they actually do the thing everyone says they're capable of are great, but they aren't enough to build a team around. Despite that, we still persisted despite being repeatedly let down.
A stronger team would've set the standards and made the cuts early, instead we've let them embed into our culture and become senior players.




