Nuggs Bunny
Moderator
- Oct 12, 2015
- 8,817
- 15,377
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Dallas Cowboys
- Moderator
- #2
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Ed Langdon, Cincotta, Jordon, Hough, Finn Maginness ect hardly known for their physicality and have done shut down jobsHe has no physicality, how on earth is he meant to negate.
So he’s good at getting the
Football and doing nothing with it. That’s hardly a strength. If he was good at getting the footy and setting another guy into space or hitting a target by foot he’d be in the team already.
Cinotta, Jordan, though and finn are all tough footballersEd Langdon, Cincotta, Jordon, Hough, Finn Maginness ect hardly known for their physicality and have done shut down jobs
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Cinotta, Jordan, though and finn are all tough footballers
Can’t see Tsatas as a negator. Not worked that way.
Endurance also an issue - very limited aerobic capacity.
Should have been a free kick for front on contact so don't blame him for not going hard enough there but not going for the loose ball after that was like watching Cam Newton not dive on the fumble in the Superbowl.I turned on the TV on the third quarter, and saw this passage of play that I think the coaches will want to see improve before he gets a chance at the next level. There are about 4 things in a row where he doesn't really commit, the chase the contest, the tackle and the smother. Frankston are 20m off the goal line, and the win is within reach - that is the point where you've really got to fight.
He reads the ball/play well - if he gets a bit more confidence in his (big) body, he could put a lot more pressure on those situations.
View attachment 2350510
I’d give him a run of games but not as a negator.Whats the loss in giving it a go before he could depart years end?
Aerobic ability arguably easier to improve then kicking
Yep he plays his way and the BF commmunity is the negatorI’d give him a run of games but not as a negator.
Give him a stretch doing what he does and see how it goes. Cant be worse than the drivel Parish has been serving up.
I turned on the TV on the third quarter, and saw this passage of play that I think the coaches will want to see improve before he gets a chance at the next level. There are about 4 things in a row where he doesn't really commit, the chase the contest, the tackle and the smother. Frankston are 20m off the goal line, and the win is within reach - that is the point where you've really got to fight.
He reads the ball/play well - if he gets a bit more confidence in his (big) body, he could put a lot more pressure on those situations.
View attachment 2350510
you might be right, perhaps he is thinking of corralling and It’s hard to judge in the moment, but a Durham or Dursma gets to that contest and is going for the ball and not the player. Potentially a worse result of front on contact, or another free - but that 37 seconds of play looks uncompetitive.He reminds me a lot of Parish, I take it as their nature is to keep themselves in a position to collect the ball, not necessarily contest the man.
Keeping his feet and not hitting that marking contest means he's staying in a position to collect the ball, even if it's not what the team needs in that moment.
Why? Durham is back.Will get a run, with Parish out?
So Parish would have been dropped, if not injured?Why? Durham is back.
HobbsSo Parish would have been dropped, if not injured?
Doesn’t it depend on what the deficiency is? I don’t know if more exposure fixes a flawed kicking technique unless the flaw is caused by a lack of composure with ball in handHow much more evidence do we need to see to know the inside of midfield is purely an exposure role? Almost like the ruck.
Pies gave Ned Long the role, he went from a non entity to a fixture, Sheldrick has been given a shot and run with it, Matt Johnson the same, Peatling, Hugo Garcia, Freijah, on and on and on.
It’s a simple matter of playing a lot of minutes.
Parish would not have been droppedSo Parish would have been dropped, if not injured?
I know, so why not bring in Tsatas now?Parish would not have been dropped
Parish was not getting droppedSo Parish would have been dropped, if not injured?
Like I said above, I know.Parish was not getting dropped
Parish was never getting droppedLike I said above, I know.