- Sep 2, 2011
- 2,483
- 2,959
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Phoenix Suns
Why are commentators always trying to justify another playing being BOG instead of Nick Daicos? It’s like a constant theme. As soon as another player has close to 30 disposals they are trying to justify why that player might be bog. Like I understand Pendles, who was good all night, but to try and say Josh was better, when he missed 8 of his first 10 kicks as well as some crucial tackles shows how much they are clutching at straws.
Pendles 3 votes for brownlow. He was best on ground.
Howe second best on ground.
Naicos third best, but he'll get 2 votes for brownlow.
The commentators were praising Pies and Eagles, very fair calls. Bucks was diplomatic with him saying Josh after Nick as having good nights.
In the end, everyone can have their opinion. Bucks opinion definitely worthy.



