Why is Ace Bailey in so many teams?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Knees could be an issue though. Might hold off till I see the lineupsHas looked terrific during the preseason, and will have the ultimate green light in Utah
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Ooh, didn't know they were unlimited. Makes sense. No guarantee to start the year is he?Unlimited trades in this, he's an easy pick
3 per week. I think Scythe was just exaggerating. I think Ace is worth 'the risk' at that price. Looks awesome but yeah hopefully his body doesnt let him downOoh, didn't know they were unlimited. Makes sense. No guarantee to start the year is he?
Ooh, didn't know they were unlimited. Makes sense. No guarantee to start the year is he?
Yes, three per week, but no overall limit.3 per week. I think Scythe was just exaggerating. I think Ace is worth 'the risk' at that price. Looks awesome but yeah hopefully his body doesnt let him down
We're thinking very similarly, although my latest iteration goes with one extra rookie on-court in order to upgrade a mid-tier guy to a proper top-liner – i.e. at one point had Nembhard + another 10-11 mill option (a few different ones were tried here), but landed on doing Booker and an extra rook instead given that VJ's role will be solid (and hopefully) playable early. Especially worthwhile with best-nine, IMO.Final iteration i think.. faded Nembhard to Pritchard, but as much for just a POD as anything else, both should be solid.
Bailey/Bench subject to last second changes.. Sheppard might swap to one of the Brooklyn PG Rooks
View attachment 2461938
It's a good point, although I'd rather not lock myself into trades in advance if I can help it, given injuries/form concerns will inevitably pop up early and you'll want trades available for those.Quite a few of the rookies are only on 2-game weeks, so you get to have a look at them before they increase in price. I think this is the case with Sheppard, Edgecombe, Queen, Bailey. So you could start without them.
suprised he isn’t more owned, heavily underpriced for seemingly no reason
Only played 47/82 games, which would likely be the main reason. Might be unders, but with Chet and iHart healthy, his minutes will be loooow.do you think that everyone can’t tell the difference between the two? lol. Based on his scores last year and players who averaged similar jaylin should be 7.9 mil, yet he is 3.5 mil basement price for some reason.
i don’t think games played impacts it, for example Tre Mann played only 12 games, averaged less than jaylin yet is 4 mil moreOnly played 47/82 games, which is the main reason. Might be a touch unders, but with Chet and iHart healthy, his minutes will be loooow.
He's definitely underpriced, but OKC will stagger iHart and Holmgren with different lineups a fair bit. Will also go small at times, like they did in the playoffs. Would probably rather fork out a little more for a C who'll get bigger minutes (like Queta, even though he's ordinary).i don’t think games played impacts it, for example Tre Mann played only 12 games, averaged less than jaylin yet is 4 mil more
expensive.
your point on the minutes is fair though, but with holmgren and ihart starting together i see him getting enough to easily make a little cash from basement price. he’s priced below players who signed like 2 days ago lol.
Surely just a case of a lot bargain shoppers.
Disregard, he's been upgraded to available (surprisingly) and with Looney out, may get some burn early.Have Queen in Dynasty, and wouldn't be too worried about picking him from the start given he only just returned to practice 3-4 days ago. I'd be somewhat surprised if he plays in week one and if he does, it'll be in a very limited role.