- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Posts
- 27,734
- Reaction score
- 10,458
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide
I wouldve gone Edwards over A.May for sure
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Guessing Bryan and Blakiston will swap between defence and ruck, and when one of them is on the bench the other will stay in defence and Wright will ruck.
Alternatively, Bryan and Wright share ruck duties and someone else is the swingman to make the structures work, but the only likely candidate for that is Langford who isn’t really tall enough for a tall defender role.
Failing that one of the kids is gonna get thrown to the wolves. In that scenario my money would be on May.
We haven’t done anything to replace McKay. Don’t even really have anyone in the wings to replace McKay… and we’re already down Ridley.
Common misconception. Things get stuck in the ureter not urethra. Although this may or may not be relevant.5 is stuck in his lower intestine or potentially the urethra, which would explain the general crabby demeanour.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Common misconception. It actually depends which direction the object entered the systemCommon misconception. Things get stuck in the ureter not urethra. Although this may or may not be relevant.
This might be the slowest forward half ever seen. Where the hell is th forward half pressure gonna come from.
Typical brad scott moveMaybe McGrath forward?
So still 3 to 4 talls at any one time. Plus perkins. Ouch.Blakiston will play solely as a defender
400% Between tall 5 (4 on field st once)
90% Cox
90% Caddy
85% 2MP
75% A.May
60% Bryan
Zerrett Nguyen, ADW aint too bad (we hardly have anything else available thats super amazing tho.)
Cox or prior could go wing for sureSo still 3 to 4 talls at any one time. Plus perkins. Ouch.
I think maybe caddy will be given full license to play up the ground.
Maybe cox key back at times.
Im interested what different moves we try but feel itl just be a super tall fwd line and we watch the opposition walk the ball out of our 50
Ideally I think cox becomes a winger. Suits the modern winger archetype. Don’t think prior should be anywhere near the first team. Just a nothing player and in the wrong age range for where the list is atCox or prior could go wing for sure
Perkins aint a tall
Cox n caddy mobility excellent
But the main point is we have no other good options
Who for who?
Why is langford listed in the forward line? It looked like he was finding a bit of form down back and keeping the others level headed
Except Cox has spent most of his career trying to play wing and has no idea.Ideally I think cox becomes a winger. Suits the modern winger archetype. Don’t think prior should be anywhere near the first team. Just a nothing player and in the wrong age range for where the list is at
He ain't a small.Cox or prior could go wing for sure
Perkins aint a tall
Cox n caddy mobility excellent
But the main point is we have no other good options
Who for who?
Ideally I think cox becomes a winger. Suits the modern winger archetype. Don’t think prior should be anywhere near the first team. Just a nothing player and in the wrong age range for where the list is at
Prior has been excellent down back this yearIdeally I think cox becomes a winger. Suits the modern winger archetype. Don’t think prior should be anywhere near the first team. Just a nothing player and in the wrong age range for where the list is at
He ain't a small.
Perkins ain't bringing pressure.
Cox doesn't have excellent mobility. For his height, he moves okay but he brings no ground ball pressure.
Cox - gresham at least
Id also prefer
Bryan - edwards
Redman for kondo
As neither look ready and wright deserves to be no.1 ruck until byran actually has some form.
Oliver probable debut.Whitfield a late out chance - achilles
