It says high contact though? Surely, even on that basis - i.e. an error in citing the actual offence in itself, is enough to have it thrown out
It's not an error. O'Sullivan's head ends up making contact with Dawson's hip. Walker is judged as having caused that incident. The push itself isn't high, the subsequent contact is, that's what is being judged.
Likewise, the impact is listed as medium, even though the force of the push is minimal. But the contact with Dawson's hip is medium force.
Of course, I'm only making this claim based on precedent, since the actual written guidelines are murky at best. The clearest passage regarding this from the 2026 tribunal guidelines is the following:
Consideration will also be given not only to the impact between the offending Player and the Victim Player, but also any other impact to the Victim Player as a result of such impact. By way of an example, where a Victim Player as a result of the impact from the offending Player is pushed into the path of a fast-moving third Player, the impact to the Victim Player may be classified as High or Severe, even though the level of impact between the offending Player and the Victim Player was only Low or Medium.
Last edited:




