Search results for query: *

Remove this Banner Ad

  1. Apex36

    Rumour Beams coming on heavy, hot and strong (Beams & picks 41 & 44 for 18, 56, COL's 2019 1st rd)

    I know it’s Lions only, so sorry to intrude, but we passed on Roughead as a FA so our compensation for Fasolo wasn’t diluted/taken away.
  2. Apex36

    2018 Trade and FA thread (opposition supporters post in Trade Hypotheticals thread)

    Not sure the Gibbs deal is really appropriate to use given the circumstances. Adelaide were runners up and considered him the missing piece of the puzzle, hence the willingness to pay a premium. Not sure that Collingwood or Essendon would be as desperate to get Beams on their lists, which would...
  3. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    If that helps you sleep at night. Given the apparent lack of interest from previously interested clubs, I’d say the market has determined it’s not.
  4. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    Touché good sir.
  5. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    I did see that, but doubt cap space is the issue. Makes for a good narrative though. I am a little disappointed, not because of Schache per se, but because I was looking forward to 2 weeks of banter on the trades board with BRAB
  6. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    No need to get personal, friend.
  7. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    Pies would prefer 6 alone or 6 and 54, but 6 and 36 isn’t unreasonable.
  8. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    Also, rational probably isn’t the right word. Reasonable is probably the word I’m looking for.
  9. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    I mean that those who still believe that Schache is worth a top 10 pick + extras with nothing else coming back aren’t rational.
  10. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    You’re one of the more rational ones in all honesty. The trade scenario you put forth on our board was not ideal imo, but palatable if it were to come to fruition.
  11. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    I feel like I’m on the verge of another thread ban.
  12. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    Honestly BRAB is the only one who I need to agree with me. I heard he’s in charge around here.
  13. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    Moore and Hipwood in the same forward line would be the nightmare. Moore and Schache might be a slightly bad dream on a good day.
  14. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    I need to get to know a person more intimately before declaring my love. Maybe if he takes me to dinner and a movie....
  15. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    Stahp it.
  16. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    For the right price I’m open to it. If you check my post history I was very against it earlier in the year when crazy numbers were being thrown around. Still against it if the price is too high.
  17. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    Stop trying to offload Close on us. Is this some kind of revenge plot for Frost?
  18. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    The more rational Lions posters I’ve spoken to seem to think I’m roughly around the mark with his value.
  19. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    So like... here and the trades board? Oh and the Collingwood board trade thread naturally. You seem to be getting a little bit emotional over this. I’d advise you that it’s not unusual for somerone to be interested in discussing a trade for a player their club has been linked with, regardless of...
  20. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    Here I am. Talking about a hypothetical trade my club has been linked to. Just as I wouldn’t be here if Collingwood was not linked. Shocking, isn’t it?
  21. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    For Brisbane, it’s a great deal. Not so much Collingwood. It’s really not. Meh. I’m not sold on Schache enough to lose sleep if we don’t get him. In two years if he’s still miserable and underperforming we might chuck a late pick your way and give him a chance.
  22. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    Wouldn’t have thought so old chum.
  23. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    Likewise I think that Collingwood and Richmond will be pretty coy going in to any discussions given the circumstances. Sounds very much like player and club have come to an agreement rather than a trade request being made because of other clubs actively pursuing him.
  24. Apex36

    2017 Trade Hypotheticals (opposition supporters post here)

    Soooooo..... 6 for Schache and 19?
  25. Apex36

    Prediction Future of Josh has gone to the Dogs.

    Lies. Kirby is invincible.
  26. Apex36

    Prediction Future of Josh has gone to the Dogs.

    You know, I was gone, and then you went and quoted me and brought me right on back here. Good work friend.
  27. Apex36

    Prediction Future of Josh has gone to the Dogs.

    Goodnight friend. I hope you have an enjoyable weekend. I sincerely enjoyed your melt while it lasted :hearts:
  28. Apex36

    Prediction Future of Josh has gone to the Dogs.

    This would have been way better if you'd beaten him to the punch :D
Back
Top