Search results for query: *

An article on it co written by Damian Barrett includes the line "first reported by Damien Barrett" What an absolute *head.

Then why were you banging on about doing it years ago? It seems it has you incredibly worked up. If him handing it back later has got so many people this stressed out, I'm a little glad it has played out like this to show just how wrong the priorities of a lot of posters here are. People that...

You are dancing around your original stupid assertion that somehow people can sue for loss of damages. TDF victory money is not going to be relevant here at all. The fact you think it is similar makes you really dumb.

Please tell me you make legal decisions as stupid as the one you are suggesting in the real world.

So Nick Dal Santo becomes a 2 time brownlow medalist.

And we have the dumbest comment yet. You should feel dumb for thinking that was worth asking.

Doesn't change anything.

Like taking potshots on the Internet. You are the real hero.

You did.

So you don't want it? Hypocrisy it is.

You crying out for club sanctions against Collingwood?

Yeah, moving on takes a bit of maturity and qualities that those with a real vindictive nature don't tend to possess.

So after 4 years, and significant penalties to players, club, individuals and to fans, people are still baying for more blood. Cheering for more penalties is a sad indictment on those in here that are investing so much time and effort into thinking about someone else's demise. I feel it says...

Circular argument is circular, yet somehow, you have managed to get yourself stuck in the corner.

You certainly proceeded to wrap your "genuine opinion" in a lot of emotional derision there yourself. Also, you mentioned it has been proved the players doped. Can you show that proof please?

A rose by any other name....

But they were for drugz, now we need them to be punished for drugs. See the difference? Totally different names. /Lavender Bushranger

All this talk about further punishment. As far as I can tell, the EFC has had nothing but rewards in the face of insurmountable evidence they cheated. The number 1 pick, access to previously delisted players all year as some sort of trial before being allowed to offer them a contract, a week...

A far more worthy reason to laugh at you would be for the amount of time and emotional energy you invest in arguing so much for an issue that isn't involving your team. I do like your point about feeling ripped off. Clearly you are the real victim here.

Not comfortably.

A disclaimer that allows you to write your own narrative depending on which team is in question. Well done. Well done.

Without any evidence? I guess thats just the collingwood way.

And if there was no solid evidence at all, would you still hang them out to dry?

The scary thing is, it seems you actually believe the crap you post.

It's a quote. Also, as you can clearly see by all the other responses, your desire to have your topic discussed isn't shared.

No I'm doesn't!

I'm sure he would be filled with warmth hearing this. Thank you.

That all seems to suit your narrative quite nicely.

Anyone involved in the interview process that handed out the charges to the players and to Dank and decided not to put up a charge against Hird?

Who mentioned the tribunal?