Search results for query: *

Aaah, you nearly got me. Then I re-read "respected AFL identities like Graham Cornes, Richo and Nathan Brown" and I got the point. Well done.

^ and here's me thinking George was going to suggest a tandem jump. On LG-H930 using BigFooty.com mobile app

I get the impression that the subjects of Jimmy's loyalty are replaced on a regular basis.

All fair points, but the whole system is so loose that technicalities like which entity imposed the sanction are usually glossed over. Bottom line is Toby skated too close to the line again and left himself open to the AFL's whim (which is always served by the MRO / Tribunal, as there is always...

Manifestly excessive.

They sure did, Mof. Bont should have been suspended for cracking that poor fella's larynx after he cleared the ball.

Chill dude, I was referring to the decisions made by the tribunal. They're loose and inconsistent. On LG-H930 using BigFooty.com mobile app

True, although their conclusions are rarely based on any rigorously applied legal standards. On LG-H930 using BigFooty.com mobile app

Only two things wrong here. (1) Graham is the father. (2) rip eyes out - wtf?

It was essentially the general view of Cotchin knocking out Shiel in last year's PF: "not worthy of missing a grand final". Oh, and I agree with you, it shouldn't be relevant.

That's the best you've got? Hiding one's team allegiances in the hope of deceiving anonymous internet participants into believing your views as a supporter are actually unbiased views of a non-supporter is pretty pathetic, don't you think? Hey, this is only the internet and a bit of fun about...

Oh, look, here's the "North Melbourne" supporter who spends his whole time on the Western Bulldogs board posting about everything Western Bulldogs and only leaving to make snipey Western Bulldogs related comments. Gets especially sooky after a big WB fail like last week. Why don't you just...

And while we're at it, let's ignore the fractured larynx caused by Bont taking Haynes out after the ball was cleared, and focus on a couple of grazes caused by Toby in a scuffle. Then we can all keep whinging about it. :thumbsu:

Right outcome, stop your sooking. Even with Stevo tearfully calling for capital punishment in his supposed role as a football journo, the "evidence" was that there was no eye-gouging. Bont didn't react, either.

My humble apologies, I was drunk. I've sobered up now and the vitriol is welling up in me. Off to the Bay now.

^ LOL, nice generalisation (two above). As a football supporter, I would have been shattered if Thompson went for that. It is part of football and the MRP/tribunal have been failing to recognise that of late. Yes, Ziebell's was a crap decision, but in no way do I want to see others rubbed out...

Was evened up in the last qtr when Hurn took a mark on the boundary at half back, then moved off his line to square the ball - O'hAilpin was penalised 50m for moving off the mark. Still, good game. Two good teams.

The great thing is, clearly now the MRP allows a player to throw 4 jumper punches, if said player plays for the newbies, GC. Hi, Nathan Krakoeur! The equitable trade-off here is that you only get a warning for throwing a kidney punch after jumping on top of that player on the ground. Hi, Callum...