Search results for query: *

Isn’t that how we end up with inconsistent tribunal rulings? By all means suspend him if it falls within the actions that warrant it, but make it consistent with other suspensions

I’m not sure how they define it, but he didn’t even have his arm as he tackled him did he? Grabbed it when he was on the ground. Is there danger in that realistically for the tackled player?

Reckon he expected him to go the other way and lost his feet when he didn't. Not intentional but looks fairly ugly.

I literally don't know what the point of that rule is. a) both players ended up injured. b) a tackle would not have affected the kick So are you supposed to just stand back and watch as your opponent kicks it? Tip your hat to him and say good day sir? Fyfe didn't leave the ground... it is...

Nah mate.

Yeah dumb rule, they want to slow the game down but then bring in something like this that'll obviously speed it up? Also this is pretty bad for ruckmen, usually a throwin is a place they can assert dominance, now all they have is centre bounces and bounces around the ground.

So can anyone actually fill those of us whom are unaware in on what the rule is?