Search results for query: *

That's all well and good, but I didnt mention a sub par September. I think you are including me in a conversation that's happening in your head.

I refer you to post #178.

Odd response to my opinion.

When your team is listed as Richmond, and your sig is all about richmond, I’m not sure just saying “for that reason alone” makes you as impartial as you want to appear.

Were you that bored with your thread idea that 4 posts in, you change the topic?

Hmm. You make a good point. Fyfe it is then.

Dusty.

Dusty is good, Fyfe is better. As much as Richmond fans will want to argue with an opinion, Fyfe wins fairly comfortably for mine.

Stack, Walsh and Rozee all looking great. I'd have Walsh and the role he plays in the middle ahead fairly comfortably though.

Usually end of the season.

Nah, you made a s**t point, got called out on it and made another s**t point trying to explain the first one.

Nick. And if I had a second choice I'd choose Nick again.

You know your "oh so witty" retort is referencing a draft from 3 seasons ago don't you?

I can't believe the Bombers passed on Oliver to take Parish instead........

Yeah fair enough. I guess like most draftees, the hopes are high, but I try to temper the expectations. He certainly ticked a lot of boxes, but so have many that didn't end up where some thought they might've. Still time, but important years have been lost.

Does it matter what I answer to a hypothetical? Since there is no possible way of knowing, it's a strange thing to ask, even if you don't preface it by calling it a genuine question. I'm not really bothered if people were to say yes or no. Would De Goey be doing as well as he is if he had the...

You keep saying it's a polls board, yet feel a need to keep making the same posts every time you think your vote is justified again. I'm guessing you are the sort that would say "I told you so" for something as simple as predicting night is going to be darker than day.

Right that a top 5 pick is doing better than a pick 20 that has had serious injury issues? I think you are setting the bar a little too low.

I think you are a little too excited about gloating that your top 5 pick is doing better than an injury riddled pick 20.

The peoples hero.

And then engaged in discussion trying to point score.......

Even if it is point scoring over a recruit out performing a player that has been cruelled by injury and was taken in the second round, as opposed to pick number 5? Little wins indeed.

Sorry. I thought that when you said you wouldn't trade Merrett for Macrae, you meant you wouldn't trade Merrett for Macrae. Not sure how I could get that so horribly wrong.

Not sure you'd ever have the chance to give your approval. A million dollars is worth more than a thousand, but I wouldn't make that trade........

Merrett is having a brilliant start to the year. Often compared to Cripps from his draft, and I think after this start, even Mrs Cripps would have to send some apology flowers to her son for picking Merrett over him Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I know who he means. I'm confused as to how that is meant to be a funny or clever way to get the guys name wrong.

I'm confused.

You keep talking stats, but haven't provided any. The ones I have seen show Daniher in front, and they don't show that he has spent a large part of his career being double teamed due to being the only option Essendon has.

Stats don't show everything.

You don't.