Remove this Banner Ad

030303

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mobbs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Originally posted by Richmondfan#1
It's really 03/03/2003, which doesn't have the same effect.

The first thing that came to my mind was: well how about just a few days ago, it would have been 30/02/2003

Then a second thing came to my mind. :)
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The first thing that came to my mind was: well how about just a few days ago, it would have been 30/02/2003


Uhh...February....28 days?

And just because somebody, IE the 'merkins, do it differently, doesn't make it wrong....not so much a reference to this post, but to the way everybody seems to criticise them for sying 9/11 in reference to September 11.

How come no one criticises the Poms for saying 200 for 6 when we say 6 for 200?
 
Because its only cricket
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Because its only cricket

Well and Good Porthos, but...it's only the date....:rolleyes:
 
Originally posted by USAEagle
The first thing that came to my mind was: well how about just a few days ago, it would have been 30/02/2003


Uhh...February....28 days?

And just because somebody, IE the 'merkins, do it differently, doesn't make it wrong....not so much a reference to this post, but to the way everybody seems to criticise them for sying 9/11 in reference to September 11.

How come no one criticises the Poms for saying 200 for 6 when we say 6 for 200?
read my post again and figure it out for yourself, wise one.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom