What an indescribably beserk comment.
Gaze and Maher operate in a very tight framework of sporting opinion.
Female participation, Indigenous discrimination and the monetisation of footy is about as hardcore as they get.
Suddenly you’re introducing selective ‘seniorcide’.
There’s more to sensible debate than picking the most extreme position you can and hoping no one has an answer - the failure is in the stupidity of the suggestion.
It's supposed to be stupid genius. That's the point. When does a point of view become stupid and simply dismissed as illegitimate?