5. Crisp
4. J. Daicos
3. De Goey
2. Pendlebury
1. Howe
4. J. Daicos
3. De Goey
2. Pendlebury
1. Howe
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Crisp, 61% disposal efficiency.5. Crisp
4. De Goey
3. Howe
2. Pendlebury
1. J. Daicos (went missing in the second half)
I thought despite some poor ball use, Crisp was immense with 11 clearances and 500+ metres gained (and 8 tackles).
Oh dear.5. Degoey
4. Howe
3. Pendles
2. J daicos
1. Mcinnes
Crisp had a shocker despite plenty of it.
Yeah I don’t disagree. As I said, poor ball use, but he had 30% of our clearances and was instrumental in us even having a look in. Consistently gave us breakaway pace around stoppages, run and carry and propelled us forward. The turnovers are a real problem, but I can forgive Crisp for them given how good he was otherwise, I couldn’t forgive Adams given he was really poor.Crisp, 61% disposal efficiency.
Daicos bros and Pendles, both 70+
DeGoey 80+ %
Adams 41%
Crisp + Adams= below AFL standard efficiency.
5 Crisp
4 J Daicos
3 Pendlebury
2 Howe
1 De Goey
HM: Kreuger, Quaynor, Moore, Grundy.
Surprised so many have De Goey near the top, I think he was invisible for three quarters, one of his goals was a hand-off from McIness and another was a well-executed kick after an opponent’s OOTF. Yet another was after a 50m penalty IIRC? He found a way to contribute and I gave him a vote but geeez.
I thought he near our best player in the 1st quarter, and was our best in the last.5 Crisp
4 J Daicos
3 Pendlebury
2 Howe
1 De Goey
HM: Kreuger, Quaynor, Moore, Grundy.
Surprised so many have De Goey near the top, I think he was invisible for three quarters, one of his goals was a hand-off from McIness and another was a well-executed kick after an opponent’s OOTF. Yet another was after a 50m penalty IIRC? He found a way to contribute and I gave him a vote but geeez.