Remove this Banner Ad

Current 4yo Boy Missing Yunta SA

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If speculation is troubling the family, I guess they could arrange for a (carefully written) statement to be published or read out on their behalf? That would remove the 'body language' interpretation. It could clearly state the family's position.

I don't see how that makes it 'harder' for the cops - the cops could review the statement and edit out anything they don't want said publicly.

The silence is not exactly 'helping' anyone at the moment. Certainly not Gus.

Oh please.

You know people would be smashing the buttons ringing Crimestoppers making reports, they'd be flooded with thousands of likely useless pieces of information.

This far in and unless it changes, the police position is that Gus is lost in the outback.
 
Another story by the Daily Mail.

Gus' Dad Josh appears to be now living in Adelaide in a house owned by the grandparents Shannon and Josie.

Gus's mother Jessica has not been seen publicly since he disappeared.

Okayyyyyyy.
Rift settled and forgotten
 
Which experts say this?
The only experts I have read about being brought in by police have said Gus couldn't have got very far from where he was last seen.

Another Daily Mail article.

Ken Gamble - 'one of Australia's top private investigators' - said the police should have been searching an 8 km radius in the crucial first hours. That doesn't sound a lot but it's about 200 sq km. To give a rough idea, You Yangs national park is about 20 sq km. 200 sq km looks a bit like this.

1762904387168.png
 
Another story by the Daily Mail.

Gus' Dad Josh appears to be now living in Adelaide in a house owned by the grandparents Shannon and Josie.

Gus's mother Jessica has not been seen publicly since he disappeared.

Sounds like they definitely don’t intend to work positively with the media.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Another Daily Mail article.

Ken Gamble - 'one of Australia's top private investigators' - said the police should have been searching an 8 km radius in the crucial first hours. That doesn't sound a lot but it's about 200 sq km. To give a rough idea, You Yangs national park is about 20 sq km. 200 sq km looks a bit like this.

View attachment 2475164
The key difference is that Gamble is an expert investigator. The 'experts' engaged by SAPOL were human behaviour and human survival experts. They reviewed police search and rescue procedures, obviously with the focus only on a 'wandered off' scenario.
An expert investigator would obviously see past the improbability of 'wandered off', and would be thinking about where Gus may have been 'taken to' in a short time without detection.
 
The key difference is that Gamble is an expert investigator. The 'experts' engaged by SAPOL were human behaviour and human survival experts. They reviewed police search and rescue procedures, obviously with the focus only on a 'wandered off' scenario.
An expert investigator would obviously see past the improbability of 'wandered off', and would be thinking about where Gus may have been 'taken to' in a short time without detection.

Gamble isn't implying foul play. He's saying Gus's abilities may have been underestimated. But still, his proposed search radius of 8 km for a 4 year old seems OTT. Try playing with Google Maps to see where walking 8 km would take you from your house. Gus wouldn't have walked in a straight line.

Even if Gus walked 5 km from the house in an unknown direction that's still an area of about 80 sg km. I had been leaning towards foul play but given the size of the search area and the logistics of searching such a remote region, I think it's plausible why they haven't found him.
 
If speculation is troubling the family, I guess they could arrange for a (carefully written) statement to be published or read out on their behalf? That would remove the 'body language' interpretation. It could clearly state the family's position.

I don't see how that makes it 'harder' for the cops - the cops could review the statement and edit out anything they don't want said publicly.

The silence is not exactly 'helping' anyone at the moment. Certainly not Gus.
The labelling from the media, daily mail in particular, isn’t helping them want to talk to media neither.
I can see the headlines now, trans granny or son in law of trans granny speaks out.
 
The labelling from the media, daily mail in particular, isn’t helping them want to talk to media neither.
I can see the headlines now, trans granny or son in law of trans granny speaks out.
I can see why they'd be uncomfortable about it. I guess this means that they have given up all hope then. If it was my child / grandchild then I would still place finding him alive, or even solving the mystery of his disappearance above my own comfort or vanity or privacy or whatever. But that's just me.
 
I can't see anybody managing to sneak up to that property, not without someone seeing a vehicle or bike, noticing wheels spinning up a heap of dust or hearing it.

Possible? Maybe but highly unlikely.
Really?

I wonder if any of the reporters who dared try to get an interview at Oak Park (pre gun incident) were potentially unnoticed before they arrived at the homestead door to knock??
 
Last edited:
I can see why they'd be uncomfortable about it. I guess this means that they have given up all hope then. If it was my child / grandchild then I would still place finding him alive, or even solving the mystery of his disappearance above my own comfort or vanity or privacy or whatever. But that's just me.
I think it goes beyond privacy and already being judged because the media are highlighting it but yes if they think something’s happened that they are unaware of then it might be helpful and at least keep the media off their case.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

If the whole family also believe he has wandered off then why say anything to the media what would it achieve. People are underestimating how remote this place is and how very little traffic would pass in a day or even a week.
Nothing to see here, can't find him, "Khalas"!
 
If he was taken, I think he'll be found. Anybody who travelled through is going to get caught on CCTV eventually and their phone will ping on towers.

There aren't as many traffic monitoring cameras out there but there's quite a lot of cops I noticed. I'm not sure if they've been ordered out in numbers in a show of higher visibility and to pull people over but I've never seen so many on outback roads before.
There is no phone reception at Oak Park.
 
What if that didn't happen?
What if Gus reached the 'main' road and was abducted.
It’s like 40 minutes by 4 wheel drive to the barrier highway afaik.
I dont know if it's when children in outback or regional areas that police always assume that they have wandered off and other scenarios are investigated too late, evidence lost.

I also think it's the dad keeping quiet that I'm now questioning.
If he doesn’t get on with his partners family does it prevent him from speaking about Gus's disappearance?
No 'I'm hoping that my son is found safe, I'm praying he's ok'
 
Another story by the Daily Mail.

Gus' Dad Josh appears to be now living in Adelaide in a house owned by the grandparents Shannon and Josie.

Gus's mother Jessica has not been seen publicly since he disappeared.

Very wealthy powerful people. Glad Josh has a job to keep him busy.
 
Which experts say this?
The only experts I have read about being brought in by police have said Gus couldn't have got very far from where he was last seen.
There was a survivability academic from Flinders University called Nina Silverstein who along with others claims Gus could been much further out. She was interviewed on 7 news. If you search for her name it will come up.
 
The key difference is that Gamble is an expert investigator. The 'experts' engaged by SAPOL were human behaviour and human survival experts. They reviewed police search and rescue procedures, obviously with the focus only on a 'wandered off' scenario.
An expert investigator would obviously see past the improbability of 'wandered off', and would be thinking about where Gus may have been 'taken to' in a short time without detection.
Gamble is definitely not a one trick pony. He takes a panoramic view of all possibilities.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

There is no phone reception at Oak Park.

Well whoever took him if that happened, has to ping a tower somewhere as they go out off the property. Same as when Cleo was taken.

Then there's CCTV as they move through towns.

There's also satellite.
 
I wouldn't, especially if they're not suspects and this isn't the city or a country rural town. It's the outback.There's nobody around, even on the made roads you can drive for 100km and not see another vehicle.

If they do speak all it's going to do is create a lot of speculative internet chatter, the 'body language experts' will be all over it and it could potentially be very distracting making things harder for the cops.
Oh we saw a lot of body language from grandma Josie on the day before the “dam draining” search.

I imagine it was distracting and did make it harder for the cops.

A little decorum from Josie that day would have gone a long way.

IMO
 
They are only going to ping if they had a mobile phone with them.
Or a GPS, tablet, laptop, smart watches and some two way radios plus any other device that accesses cellular netwroks ( like a vehicle etc).

Anyway you look at it it is not going to be easy getting in and out of that place unnoticed.
 
Or a GPS, tablet, laptop, smart watches and some two way radios plus any other device that accesses cellular netwroks ( like a vehicle etc).

Anyway you look at it it is not going to be easy getting in and out of that place unnoticed.

And if the cops were looking hard enough, any vehicle spotted on CCTV or satellite they can't assign to any form of communications, they'd take an extra hard look at.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current 4yo Boy Missing Yunta SA

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top