Conspiracy Theory 9/11 - Part 3

[Procrastinator35]

Seems like I've hooked most of the trolls in one here......Hmmmm.….Must be doing something right.

Only TP & Zidane re M.I.a.

Like moths to the flame of truth.

 

[SaintsSeptember]

Never mind the nonsense about how it it "just in the right spot" to take out specific offices and rooms - that's often thrown in there too, which again is very easily shown to be total fantasy.

If they hit another spot it would have taken out "other specific offices and rooms, which they would claim were significant " they don't house the department for removal of obsolete phone booths in the pentagon.

 

[SaintsSeptember]

Planes come in many different sizes.

Eye witnesses on the day did report a jumbo coming in very low that day, but none of them claimed it hit the Pentagon - but rather - went over it.

Perfect cover for a cruise missile to strike simultaneously.

It's also miraculous how the terrorists managed to pick the one day where the NORaD war games were taking place, rendering the most protected airspace in the world bereft of cover due to all the fighter jets being out in the Atlantic.

Clearly Allah, in his infinite wisdom, is all knowing.

The coincidences just keep piling up atop of one another…..It's almost as if the whole thing was planned in advance by the Yanks themselves.....hmmm.

Only Fools subscribe to the official narrative.

Maybe they modified the Jumbo to launch the cruise missile, avoiding the need for the way too conspicuous B52.
They would have only needed to spend another fortune, and swear thousands of Boeing employees to silence.

 

[JackOutback]

No s**t dude. I was exposed as a MOSSAD agent in another thread and my entire meaning in life is to monitor Aussie sports forums and derail anything that may spark anti Semitic discussion.

Good gigs if you can get them

 

[SaintsSeptember]

and once again.... cruise missile looks like a plane.

The dynamics necessary for a jumbo to hit in the way they claim are impossible.....all the evidence of the impact crater, the damage & the debris fits a cruise missile.

The fact the FBI refuse to release that footage also backs my premise.

The footage was released using standard camera speed.
Unfortunately they didn't have the lighting and special high speed equipment that you seem to think they did.

It was not impossible for a Jumbo to hit that way. It was also not impossible for the actual type of plane that it was to hit that way.
A JUMBO IS A 747 .....no-one ....ever ever ever said it was a 747. STOP SAYING JUMBO...it makes you seem so stupid i get embarrassed for you.

 

[Procrastinator35]

Just talk amongst yourselves lads, while I lay out all the evidence before youse.

So many non-sequiturs, Red Herrings & attempted logical fallacies.....It's delicious fare to be sure.

 

[SaintsSeptember]

Just talk amongst yourselves lads, while I lay out all the evidence before youse.

So many non-sequiturs, Red Herrings & attempted logical fallacies.....It's delicious fare to be sure.

What evidence?
Which missile do you think looks like a passenger plane?
WHere did it get launched?
Why do you think its impossible for a jet to fly into the building, but the trajectory was nothing like a guided missile would use?
If they wanted to hit the building with a missile, why would they not use a conventional trajectory instead of hitting the ground first? Are you suggesting that hole was caused by an explosive? that an explosive would produce that sort of hole? What a load of crap.
Why do you consider you've posted anything except flimsy unsubstantiated ideas?

You know how evidence works?

You think (sort of the process ) the official story is lamo, so you making something up proves it?

What kind of missile do you think it was?
Come on mr evidence
What kind of missile?

 

[HAPPY BUDDHA]

Just talk amongst yourselves lads, while I lay out all the evidence before youse.

So many non-sequiturs, Red Herrings & attempted logical fallacies.....It's delicious fare to be sure.

What evidence?
It is all guess work, conjecture and hypotheticals that you lay out before everyone.

 

[BustedWing]

What evidence?
It is all guess work, conjecture and hypotheticals that you lay out before everyone.

Don’t get bogged down in the detail here, it’s all clear as day.

It was a missile that sort of looked like a plane fired from a submarine but also from a destroyer, that magically turns into plane debris upon impact that everyone mistook for a plane when in flight,m. Oh and there was also another plane because...well yeah there was, and ooh ooh, there was a missile defence system that was turned off, we’ll just forget about the fact there is a major airport a couple of miles away and there are passenger planes flying over the pentagon every hour making such a defence system utterly insane....and said missile/plane/missile hit the exact offices that plotted the whole thing because they needed to destroy the evidence and they did it this way because they forgot about files on computers being accessible from remote places and and and.....staples was out of stock on shredders that day???

Was there thermite in there too?

Did I forget anything?

That’s the story. No need to ask for proof of any of this. It’s true, trust me. I did my research.




Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Present Not Past]

I think you already know what the “evidence” will involve. That’s right - the Zionist Cabals.

 

[Procrastinator35]

What evidence?
It is all guess work, conjecture and hypotheticals that you lay out before everyone.

Nah….at least I've provide images from the Pentagon site on the day.....The F.B.I can't even do that; Proving the government has much to hide.

The entry wound was perfectly compatible with a missile only & a cruise missile is the likely culprit....The rest of that wing of the Pentagon collapsed after explosions were heard to go off later on, as corroborated by witnesses on the day....Most particularly by the one auditor who survived on the day....Who also corroborated it was no passenger plane that caused the initial impact & damage.,...as the evidence itself shows clearly enough.

Only people covering over the holes in the govt narrative with their own imaginations, believe the govt nonsense....What Chomsky refers to as 'Manufactured Consent'.

 

[STFU Donnie]

I must say I'm enjoying reading the (thoughtful) replies and imagining what that other person has written.

Sadly, the more ridiculous I get, the more likely they are to be on the mark. My imaginings, that is.

 

[BustedWing]

Nah….at least I've provide images from the Pentagon site on the day.....The F.B.I can't even do that; Proving the government has much to hide.

The entry wound was perfectly compatible with a missile only & a cruise missile is the likely culprit....The rest of that wing of the Pentagon collapsed after explosions were heard to go off later on, as corroborated by witnesses on the day....Most particularly by the one auditor who survived on the day....Who also corroborated it was no passenger plane that caused the initial impact & damage.,...as the evidence itself shows clearly enough.

Only people covering over the holes in the govt narrative with their own imaginations, believe the govt nonsense....What Chomsky refers to as 'Manufactured Consent'.

Imagine basing a view on this topic on something to easily checkable, you can do it with a google search inside of 10 seconds, and yet still come up with a position so completely wrong.

It makes said person either a troll, or mentally deficient for the conversation, in my opinion.

Which one I wonder.....which one....


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[ThunkaHunka]

 

[Exe Gesis]

I guess its really happening then....Trump, Q, the great awakening....

 

[BustedWing]

I guess its really happening then....Trump, Q, the great awakening....

Whats really happening?

 

[Exe Gesis]

Whats really happening?

Big step toward full disclosure.

Did you watch it....he asserts how sus so much is that youve been saying for ages isnt sus

 

[BustedWing]

Big step toward full disclosure.

Did you watch it....he asserts how sus so much is that youve been saying for ages isnt sus

Hes a guy who believes conspiracy theories that he found online....

How does that equate to anything different to what we've seen for the past 20 years?

 

[SaintsSeptember]

Nah….at least I've provide images from the Pentagon site on the day.....The F.B.I can't even do that; Proving the government has much to hide.

The entry wound was perfectly compatible with a missile only & a cruise missile is the likely culprit....The rest of that wing of the Pentagon collapsed after explosions were heard to go off later on, as corroborated by witnesses on the day....Most particularly by the one auditor who survived on the day....Who also corroborated it was no passenger plane that caused the initial impact & damage.,...as the evidence itself shows clearly enough.

Only people covering over the holes in the govt narrative with their own imaginations, believe the govt nonsense....What Chomsky refers to as 'Manufactured Consent'.

Sorry you have no qualification to state that. Provide evidence that an entry wound from a cruise missile looks anything like that.
Please provide details of which cruise missile you are talking about. How was it launched? B52?
Do you ignore the questions you can't answer , like why doesn't the water run off the edge of the earth?

 

[BlueE]

Hes a guy who believes conspiracy theories that he found online....

How does that equate to anything different to what we've seen for the past 20 years?

You meant the NY Fire Commissioner hosting the forum in the video, ex marine core veteran and 33 year veteran fireman including 5 years as a chief who works in the heavy construction industry specialising in structural concrete, major foundation work and structural steel who was on the Brooklyn side of the East river on the morning of 9/11 was an eye witness to the attacks?

He was then called to Fire Service duty in the following days and weeks and was there to publisise the criminal case that has been submitted to the SDNY in April 2020 with 54 pages of evidence and 57 pages of exhibits demanding a grand jury be convened? Over 3000 people lost their lives that day including 363 firefighters and they and others deserve justice which wasn't served with the 9/11 Commission Report.

This is already known.
9/11 commission Chairman and VC Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton stated in their book “Without Precedent” they were “set up to fail” and they were “starved of funds to do a proper investigation”.

They confirmed they were denied access to the truth and mislead by senior officials in the Pentagon and the FAA, and this obstruction and misconception led them to contemplate criminal charges on officials from the Pentagon and FAA.

The Final Report of the 9/11 Commission did not examine key evidence and neglected serious anomalies in various reports about what happened. Officials admitted Report was incomplete and flawed with many questions about the terror attack remain unanswered.

Never the less the Commission was swiftly closed down on August 21 2004. The failing of the Official investigation has fuelled many speculative conspiracy theories.

However some of these 9/11 groups, including Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth and Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry to name a few, raise important questions that were not even considered, investigated or answered by the Commission.

Submitted findings of the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) 4 year investigation of Building 7 which wasn't hit by any aircraft. Building 7 drops in under 7 seconds in the exact manner of a controlled demolition.

9/11 Investigators never looked for evidence of explosive residue admitted in writing.

UAF Found a series of manipulations or assumptions that were invalid or fraudulent and able to prove fires could not have cause the collapse of building 7.

Found NEST had omitted key structural components in building 7 to try to prove a girder would fall, but even then the fall would have only generated 1/3 the force needed to move the girder below from it’s support which make it impossible to cause a sequential collapse..

Found to make the building collapse like was seen on the day of 9/11 they had to remove 650 columns over 8 floors within a second or so of each other. Then the building drops like the video shows.

What they want to know, as should the media is;

Why important testimony from 150 police, firefighters and first responders about explosions in the towers wasn’t included in the Commission Report or investigated further?

Why didn’t the FBI or NEST investigate the wreckage for explosives?

Why wasn’t the wreckage treated as a crime scene and sealed off?

Why was crucial evidence of melted structural steel suppressed or not even considered or worse allowed to be carted off and destroyed?

Why won’t the MSM report an any of this let alone ask hard questions about how and why events happened as they did, esp about how building 7 collapse?

Why can’t American’s hear the recording of FDNY Battalion Chief Orial Palmer's communication? He and his men succeeded making it to point of impact on 78th floor of Sth tower and reported he had two isolated pockets of fire and they could put the fires out with two hoses? One minute after making his last transmission the south tower collapsed.

Why can’t Americans hear that it took a law suit to get fire fighters tapes released so the public could hear what fire fighters said and this didn’t happen until one year (Aug 2005) after the 9/11 Commission wound up?

Why are nano thermite chips found in all WTC dust?

Why did FEMA in 2002 building assessment report in ltd steel hot temp corrosion found sulpher used with thermite to make thermate more effective to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter? Why is it found in all the dust as well?

Why did the towers come down in 12 seconds completely shattered from top to bottom?

Why are there isolated explosive ejections emitted out of the towers 20, 40 or 60 floors below what were told is a gravitational collapse?

Was evidence of high energy explosives and evidence of thermite and nano thermite in the debris?

Looking at a comparison of other Inquiry costs:

Muller investigation into Russian Collusion cost 25 mil

Whitewater Investigation into the Clintons 60-70 mil

Space shuttle Challenger Investigation where 7 astronauts died cost 175 mil.

Space shuttle Columbia Investigation with 7 astronauts killed cost 400 mil.

9/11 Investigation cost 15 mil after originally given 3 mil and 18 months to compete (extended by 2 months).

Bottom line is that the Public have not been told the complete truth about what happened on 9/11, 18 years ago.

Equally important is how the 9/11 cover up has signified an absence democratic, transparent and accountable govt. Establishing the truth is in part about restoring honest, trust and competence in the American Political System.

 

[BlueE]

What is different to anything that has happened in the last 20 years is the comprehensive UAF report demonstrating building 7 was not brought down by fires but a simultaneous 650 column collapse over 8 stories and the law suit filed by the Legal Commission for 9/11.

In the SDNY lawyers (LC for 9/11.org) in April 2020 filed criminal case with 54 pages of evidence including 57 exhibits and presented to the US Attorney’s Office in NYC. It as amended to file additional bombing charges with 18 USC 333A which mandates calling a special grand jury to consider the evidence presented, mostly from evidence gathered by Architect and Engineers, claiming explosives, incendiaries and controlled demotions were involved in bringing the towers down.

They also stated they are suing US AG William Barr and SDNY AG Geoff Bermann and in Washington in March filed against FBI for not assessing evidence including the following

• Explosive evidence
• Israel national arrested in NJ high fiving after the event
• Destruction of evidence of photos that were destroyed showing explosive evidence.
• Des

Claimed Mueller (appointed FBI chief on Sept 4th 2001) and Barr’s job has been to cover up.

Pretty sure that's new and pretty sure the quote given in the video (see below) describes busted record who is in the minority both in America and the rest of the world if they believe the official conclusion from the 9/11 commission that a "failure in communication" was responsible for bringing down the three towers on the 11th September 2001.

“We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark, but the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light”.

 

[Exe Gesis]

“We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark, but the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light”.

Whos attributed to that quote? Thats a killer saying.

 

[BustedWing]

Have you ever heard of the term Gish Gallop?

 

[Exe Gesis]

Have you ever heard of the term Gish Gallop?

Of course, thats what youve been doing for years on here

 

[BustedWing]

Of course, thats what youve been doing for years on here

I dont think it means what you think it means then, it would seem...