- Banned
- #1
Hello friends.
It seems to me that in many ways our great sport is decades behind other codes. From the ubiquity of zonal strategies, to television broadcast production values, and many things in between - including, I would argue, common understandings of basic terminology.
I think you, the good people of bigfooty, can help to rectify this. So I come to you with a question:
What does the term 'inside midfielder' mean to you? Or, if you prefer, what should it mean?
It seems to me there are several schools of thought on this. One says that an 'inside midfielder' is a type of footballer: one who can regularly win contested ball at stoppages, but is somewhat lacking in ability to win/damage with possession in open space. Another says that an inside midfielder has the contested ball-winning skills but can also have the 'outside' game as well and still be an 'inside mid'.
A very different school of thought says that an 'inside midfielder' is not a type of player but a role; that is, a team will have one or two (or more) designated players, whoever is the best qualified for the job in their team, to act as the player trying to win that contested ball in close, as part of an overall midfield setup.
The latter may seem an odd distinction but to those who know football and/or language it is an important one.
What are your thoughts? What does the term 'inside midfielder' mean to you? Who/what is/isn't an inside midfielder and why?
It seems to me that in many ways our great sport is decades behind other codes. From the ubiquity of zonal strategies, to television broadcast production values, and many things in between - including, I would argue, common understandings of basic terminology.
I think you, the good people of bigfooty, can help to rectify this. So I come to you with a question:
What does the term 'inside midfielder' mean to you? Or, if you prefer, what should it mean?
It seems to me there are several schools of thought on this. One says that an 'inside midfielder' is a type of footballer: one who can regularly win contested ball at stoppages, but is somewhat lacking in ability to win/damage with possession in open space. Another says that an inside midfielder has the contested ball-winning skills but can also have the 'outside' game as well and still be an 'inside mid'.
A very different school of thought says that an 'inside midfielder' is not a type of player but a role; that is, a team will have one or two (or more) designated players, whoever is the best qualified for the job in their team, to act as the player trying to win that contested ball in close, as part of an overall midfield setup.
The latter may seem an odd distinction but to those who know football and/or language it is an important one.
What are your thoughts? What does the term 'inside midfielder' mean to you? Who/what is/isn't an inside midfielder and why?





