Backs going forward

Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Posts
1,183
Likes
26
Location
East Bentleigh
AFL Club
Melbourne
Thread starter #1
I'm liking this its probably not the long term solution but since Rivers & Garland have gone forward they have givien the forward line some unpredictability & are kicking goals plus making matchups & tactics of the opposition harder to quell the influence of Mitch Clark.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

tasmanlvr

Mernda Football Club represent
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Posts
2,485
Likes
2,313
Location
Mernda
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Mernda, Arsenal, MBD, #gogenie
#8
To think the lack of a key forward was one of our biggest concerns upon Mark coming to the club. Suddenly we look rich - Garland, Rivers, Clark, Cook (showing a bit in the VFL), Martin, Jamar as a resting forward looks the goods. In the future if we get 35 goals or more a season out of at least three of them... wow...

Heck we even tried Sellar, I like the fact that Neeld is trying to find solutions that will work. Unlike Bailey who seemed to panic a fair bit, didn't really change things up a lot.
 

Djcjdees

Premiership Player
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Posts
3,008
Likes
2,581
Location
Hobart
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Middlesbrough FC
#10
To think the lack of a key forward was one of our biggest concerns upon Mark coming to the club. Suddenly we look rich - Garland, Rivers, Clark, Cook (showing a bit in the VFL), Martin, Jamar as a resting forward looks the goods. In the future if we get 35 goals or more a season out of at least three of them... wow...

Heck we even tried Sellar, I like the fact that Neeld is trying to find solutions that will work. Unlike Bailey who seemed to panic a fair bit, didn't really change things up a lot.
Agree. I like the fact he is willing to try new things when it isn't working. Most coaches these days are too stubborn (or believe in what they have put in place too much) to change things and just keep repeating the same.

I reckon North are in the middle of that now. Looks great when it comes together, get belted when it doesn't
 

Animosity

Team Captain
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Posts
391
Likes
94
AFL Club
Melbourne
#11
What puzzled me was why Jack Watts wasnt given a run at CHF after clark went down ... I know he played well, no doubt .. but he was drafted as a forward, why not see if he could have lived up to his position prospect and playing against players his own age and gain some confidence? Or do you think this is it, Watts will never play forward again given his backline form.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

stretcharmstrong

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Posts
6,863
Likes
4,748
Location
Australia
AFL Club
Melbourne
#12
What puzzled me was why Jack Watts wasnt given a run at CHF after clark went down ... I know he played well, no doubt .. but he was drafted as a forward, why not see if he could have lived up to his position prospect and playing against players his own age and gain some confidence? Or do you think this is it, Watts will never play forward again given his backline form.
Jack will go forward again at some stage in his career - I'm certain of it.

But I suspect he will probably play out the year down back. He is getting an education down there, developing a bit of hunger and improving his body work. He's also very valuable to the team down there at the moment.

I wouldn't have an issue with Jack spending 12-24 months in the back line, just to let the important lessons he is learning down there really sink in? You can't learn many things worth learning in a short period of time, patience will be required.
 

rhaz

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Posts
6,988
Likes
4,176
AFL Club
Melbourne
#13
Jack is building with confidence every week. IMO, they should leave him there until the end of the year, then make a decision - either throw him in with the forwards in 2012-13 preseason, or keep him down back for good.
 

Ando727

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Posts
5,558
Likes
11,169
Location
Hobart
AFL Club
Melbourne
#14
I could see Jack being a permanent backman for his whole career. What he has going for him is good decision making under pressure, good skills and good vision. He's agile and tall enough to take a big forward. long arms good for spoiling/punching too. I wouldn't see it as a big negative if he never became a forward. We need a strong backline too.
 

Ando727

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Posts
5,558
Likes
11,169
Location
Hobart
AFL Club
Melbourne
#15
Garland has a certain X-factor in the forward line. Rivers should be used sparingly up forward. With Jeremy Howe being dangerous up forward as well as midfield, Jurrah to possibly return, we still have avenues to goal. Still spewing about Mitch though. He was the linchpin. Now we definitely need to unearth one more tall forward. I'd give Spencer or Martin another go, personally.
 

stretcharmstrong

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Posts
6,863
Likes
4,748
Location
Australia
AFL Club
Melbourne
#16
Garland has a certain X-factor in the forward line. Rivers should be used sparingly up forward. With Jeremy Howe being dangerous up forward as well as midfield, Jurrah to possibly return, we still have avenues to goal. Still spewing about Mitch though. He was the linchpin. Now we definitely need to unearth one more tall forward. I'd give Spencer or Martin another go, personally.
Depending on how Fitzpatrick progresses with management of his diabetes, I'd like to see him get a crack sooner rather than later. Martin is probably the most likely one though.
 

Blackas87

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Feb 15, 2011
Posts
7,097
Likes
8,594
Location
Kwan-li-so
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Orlando magic
#17
I said last year on here after the Hawthorn game that Rivers should play forward, looks like I was right:D

Not sure if people remember but both Garland and Rivers were drafted as forwards. I think with both of them playing their careers down back they have learn't how to be accountable and how they must go hard at the ball, its no surprise to me that both these guys have played pretty well since going forward.

This is what I think we should be doing with some of our other young key players, Watts, Mcdonald, Cook and Davis. With the season already over these guys should be given roles down back to teach them some accountability. I remember reading another recruiters article that Lucas Cook would be just as good down back as he would be up forward so I have no problem with him going down back. It seems to be working with Watts, Mcdonald who also can play forward has been really impressive down back, so I would love to see Cook and Davis play down back, I think it can only be good for their careers.

Garland and Rivers to stay forward and let the young blokes learn down back.
 

Deemanding

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 24, 2009
Posts
1,851
Likes
1,192
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Subi Lions, Trailblazers, AS Roma
#18
Jack will go forward again at some stage in his career - I'm certain of it.

But I suspect he will probably play out the year down back. He is getting an education down there, developing a bit of hunger and improving his body work. He's also very valuable to the team down there at the moment.

I wouldn't have an issue with Jack spending 12-24 months in the back line, just to let the important lessons he is learning down there really sink in? You can't learn many things worth learning in a short period of time, patience will be required.
Agreed. Worked for our all time leading goalkicker.

No probs keeping Jack there for the rest of the season, then reassess the start of the next.
 

Wonaeamirri33

Lovable Whore With A Heart Of Gold
Joined
May 10, 2009
Posts
28,745
Likes
21,682
Location
Brisbane
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
FITZROY, Aylesbury United, St Pauli
#19
We'll certainly need Garland and Riv up forward now. Hopefully the 'Cane will return soon as well. He'll make a big difference when he finds his 2011 form again.
 
Top Bottom