Baker Vs Darcy Wtf!!!!

[donisgood_555]

Similar Happenings

1. they both hit other players in the face
2. intentional contact
3. both players went off with blood rules
4. both will play in the next weeks
5. one is a lanky as ruckman the other a tagger
6. both didnt have video evidence

Y is it that one gets 7 weeks and the other gets NOTHING
please tell me caus clearly the tribunual is going ko ko

 

[HoldenMCaulfield]

The inconsistency is indeed quite amazing this year:

I assume that Darcy will have learned from the Baker incident and will have "stretched" the truth.

I wonder what Ben Johnson had to say about Josh Carr getting away with one week - or what Brodie Holland had to say about Amon Buchanan getting away with one week (Barry Hall will probably have recommended to appeal that one week...).

But Rocca got away too - him being him, I would have expected at least eight weeks !

 

[Fryman]

I think we all just want consistency. This is just another example of different sets of rules for different players. I don't know why the tribunal doesn't use precedents when deciding their verdict. It would cut out half the crap that goes on. Player X gets 2 weeks for a head high bump, the next week player Y gets 2 weeks for a similar incident. At the moment it's "chook lotto" to quote Gerard Healy.