FFC + BBFC = BBFFC
All Australian
both were pretty soft....and even though they were given 1 game each, they will appeal it....and who doesnt get off at the appeals board??It's a joke 
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Both Didak and Burns will get off
- Thread starter FFC + BBFC = BBFFC
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
i wish you were right! i believe burns might get off, but didak?! i dont think so he is always in scuffles with other plays and i think its time for him to get suspended! i hope not though, because we will do it tuff with out the inform dids and burns.
FFC + BBFC = BBFFC said:both were pretty soft....and even though they were given 1 game each, they will appeal it....and who doesnt get off at the appeals board??It's a joke
I hope Mick decides to Appeal, because without Didak and Burns our chances of winning are low.
We are playing Brisbane this week, so of course they were going to get a week and they wont get off. Essendon next week, wouldnt put it past the tribunal increasing it to 2 weeks. Last year they would have been guaranteed 2 weeks as Brissie and Essendon were loved by the tribunal last year
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
They would be mad if they took the Burns case to the tribunal. We cant afford to lose him for two weeks. He's guilty and we should cop the one on the chin and be satisfied it wasnt more. After the controversy of the Pickett and Moloney cases, Burns doesnt stand a chance.
Didak's case should be taken to the tribunal. The contact was incidental, these types of things happen every week. Last week Hall laid a big punch into the midriff of Fanning and got off. Didak's elbow had no force.
Didak's case should be taken to the tribunal. The contact was incidental, these types of things happen every week. Last week Hall laid a big punch into the midriff of Fanning and got off. Didak's elbow had no force.
eddiesmith said:
Yeah like the Vic clubs get it tough from the AFL don't they? I think you need to look at the tribunal records there sunshine if you reckon we had it light last year!
Coin_Toss said:
Even if you had both therse players your chances of winning are zip
goalpie
Premiership Player
hotpie said:
Swans are protected species, cant have them missing out on the finals.
hotpie said:
yeah, but what about G-Trains 'lovetap'
Lonie_from_50 said:
One of the few ordinary decisions made by the tribunal this year. If thats a precendent Didak is gawn and fifty other blokes shoudl also have been suspended this year including Hall last week.
hotpie said:
That's where you're wrong. Scotty's charge is a LEVEL 1, which is one week regardless. He couldn't get it reduced to less points than 100 due to his past record. So if he appeals and fails he'll still get the week. Great position to be in!
Dids is the opposite. He could go for two weeks if they refuse to budge, rather than taking the one. Of course, he could get it downgraded to zero, so that's his risk. Do we accept the Brisbane loss anyways, and let Dids have another rest before firing for the last six? Or contest it, and possibly lose him for Essendon also?
