Remove this Banner Ad

Boucher = Cheat

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Against New Zealand I think it was in the Perth Test, Langer walked when the umpire wasn't going to give him out. Turned out it was a No Ball that the umpire overlooked. My point?? Never walk, because the chances are u'll be given out by a bad decision soon, or the Umpire isn't doing his job...
 
Originally posted by Dave
How anyone could defend not walking after hitting a catch like that is beyond me.

very very funny

perhaps he didn't know ;)

No-one walks in cricket anymore - at almost any level.


Get used to it

Would Matthew Lloyd tell the umpire when he gave away a free kick which the umpire didn't see? I think not.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by kretchy
He was out but your supposed to play by the umpires decison.

No, you are supposed to play by the rules of the game. If a batsman knows he is out he should walk, end of story.
 
Originally posted by Pies rock
Against New Zealand I think it was in the Perth Test, Langer walked when the umpire wasn't going to give him out. Turned out it was a No Ball that the umpire overlooked. My point?? Never walk, because the chances are u'll be given out by a bad decision soon, or the Umpire isn't doing his job...

And chances are you'll get given not out when out along the way too, eg the LBW in the first Test.
 
Originally posted by Jars458
Would Matthew Lloyd tell the umpire when he gave away a free kick which the umpire didn't see? I think not.

Different game, different rules and a different tradition.

Cricket is supposed to be a gentlemans game. Everyone knows footballers are a bunch of cheating arseholes. :eek:
 
Originally posted by Dave


And chances are you'll get given not out when out along the way too, eg the LBW in the first Test.

My point exactly, what goes around comes around. It all evens itself out in the end. Langer was also crucified by the Umpires in India, he's still a long way behind...
 
Originally posted by Player
Did the umpire show dissent by not moving, questioning the bowlers appeal, and bringing the game into 'disrepute'.

LOL!

Equity demands the umpire receives a one match suspension for the next game.

I don't know about equity, but common sense sure does.
 
Originally posted by Pies rock
My point exactly, what goes around comes around. It all evens itself out in the end.

That's all well and good, however it does not preclude doing the right thing. If a player knows he is out he should walk.
 
Originally posted by Jars458
Would Matthew Lloyd tell the umpire when he gave away a free kick which the umpire didn't see? I think not.

I think Matty is used to getting free kicks he doesn't deserve these days..in fact, he kind of expects it now...;)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I think you're right, Dave. But you'd have a hard time convincing half the Australian team, including the captain, of it. I just hope you slam one of our boys as hard next time he refuses to walk.
 
I saw Bevan walk on a run out on Sunday as well as Ponting (though his was BLOODY obvious).

And rest assured, if I see one as blatant as that, I will.
 
Dave, I am sad to say it, but I have changed my own policy this season.

Over the years I have usually walked, to the consternation of my team mates. However, I have accepted that the practice these days is not to walk, and the ethic is to accept the umpire's decision.

THe only exception is if it's a teammate umpiring (ie not a professional umpire), when I will walk if it's clearly out.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom