Caroline is bleeding.

[jonbe54]

You've totally lost the plot Soho. There is so much wrong with your rantings in this post alone I think you are either a troll or need help. Time for a lie down and a good think about the rubbish you've posted in this thread.

SOHO obviously has a fixation about the justice system and who can blame him BUT . . . . . . . WTF has that got to do with the point?
WTF has OJ got to do with the point?

NOTHING!!!!!!!!

Like many fixated people SOHO will twist any circumstance to use in their arguments. No amount of reason will convince someone like that. They are totally convinced that their pet theory is the sum total of truth in the universe, if it wasn't so damaging to all the parties involved it would simply be rather sad.

 

[Dawson]

I am really surprised that this thread is still being allowed, given the amount of posters protesting. It is sailing close to the wind.

Soho - You need to talk to a professional - seriously.

Why? because you disagree with him?

I disagree with him, but I don't want him silenced, he has just as much right to express a point of view as you do.

If you want to complain about something then complain about the plethora of inane threads that are allowed to run unfettered on here not the ones that actually generate real debate.

 

[jonbe54]

Why? because you disagree with him?

I disagree with him, but I don't want him silenced, he has just as much right to express a point of view as you do.

If you want to complain about something then complain about the plethora of inane threads that are allowed to run unfettered on here not the ones that actually generate real debate.

Daws mate I know you aimed this at hgiel but would like to add my two bits worth.
1. I have no quarrel with SOHO's opinions but they are about his dissatisfaction with the justice system and as no charges have been laid those views are IRRELEVANT
2. SOHO keeps bringing totally unrelated bits and pieces into the argument like the family law court and OJ's circus FFS!

To me that speaks of someone with an agenda all about the inequality of feminine access to justice and the armchair ride sports and celebrity people are perceived to get.

I have no problem with that and actually mostly agree

HOWEVER

This thread is about a 5th rate article muck raking in a speculative bid to make the author somewhat relevant in sporting circles - fail by the way.

So most of SOHO's stuff is good - but totally irrelevant.

 

[Dave06]

Soho is a troll flog with nothing rational, reasonable or logical to say. Stop feeding him.

 

[Dawson]

Daws mate I know you aimed this at hgiel but would like to add my two bits worth.
1. I have no quarrel with SOHO's opinions but they are about his dissatisfaction with the justice system and as no charges have been laid those views are IRRELEVANT.

They may well be irrelevent to you, but clearly they are not to SOHO

2. SOHO keeps bringing totally unrelated bits and pieces into the argument like the family law court and OJ's circus FFS!.

He can ague anything he likes if HE believes it strengthens his point

To me that speaks of someone with an agenda all about the inequality of feminine access to justice and the armchair ride sports and celebrity people are perceived to get.

I have no problem with that and actually mostly agree.

Everyone here has an agenda, that's why we are here

This thread is about a 5th rate article muck raking in a speculative bid to make the author somewhat relevant in sporting circles - fail by the way..

Agree, but that is no longer the issue

So most of SOHO's stuff is good - but totally irrelevant.

Again its only irrelevent to you

 

[jonbe54]

They may well be irrelevent to you, but clearly they are not to SOHO



He can ague anything he likes if HE believes it strengthens his point



Everyone here has an agenda, that's why we are here





Agree, but that is no longer the issue



Again its only irrelevent to you

Read the thread title mate. . .

Does it mention anywhere about SOHO's justice issues?

The thread is about an article not SOHO's agenda

As for someone using anything to strengthen their argument. . .

If I wanted to get a seat at a packed theater I don't have the right to yell 'fire!' to empty the place just so I can get a good seat. Neither does SOHO have the right to drag the thread off topic just to prove his point.

 

[Dawson]

Read the thread title mate. . .

Does it mention anywhere about SOHO's justice issues?

The thread is about an article not SOHO's agenda

As for someone using anything to strengthen their argument. . .

If I wanted to get a seat at a packed theater I don't have the right to yell 'fire!' to empty the place just so I can get a good seat. Neither does SOHO have the right to drag the thread off topic just to prove his point.

Look we can go back and forth and get nowhere, but if you think the title of thread controls what is said in a thread then all I can say is "Welcome to BigFooty"

As to your argument in the above post, I don't intend to give it any thought what-so-ever, my warm chicken roll lunch is getting cold

 

[jonbe54]

Look we can go back and forth and get nowhere, but if you think the title of thread controls what is said in a thread then all I can say is "Welcome to BigFooty"

As to your argument in the above post, I don't intend to give it any thought what-so-ever, my warm chicken roll lunch is getting cold

Quality post