Fervy
Debutant
- Joined
- May 3, 2010
- Posts
- 141
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Angels, Blazers, Patriots, Chelsea
Continuing this from the votes for the St Kilda game thread...
Chris Judd's disposal is suspect. I've written as such that I realize that his disposal often lets him down. However, he is still one of the most damaging players in the game.
The way that he takes the bull by the horns and the way in which he gets possesion of the football sets an example to all of his team-mates.
He doesn't need thirty five possessions for it to be considered a good game, unlike Geelong's Brownlow medallist. Truth be known, even Thompson realizes that Ablett racks up a boat load of soft possessions week in week out.
Judd may have 10 or so less possessions but his impact on the game of football is so much greater than Ablett's, who if it weren't for the likes of Bartel, Ling, Chapman and Selwood would be viewed as nothing more than another ball loving fairy.
The media and fans of teams have a tendency to take a look towards the statistics and base that as their sole judgment on who has played well.
In my opinion, Bartel and Chapman won the Grand Final for you last year. Bartel was on fire early in the game and was winning his own possession. However, he was asked to move into a tagging role and shut down his opponent while winning the ball himself (though not at the level that he had accumulated them earlier in the game) and Chapman led the goal kicking.
The difference between Chris Judd and Gary Ablett is leaps and bounds. Geelong have proven that they can win without Ablett. They have also proven that they can lose and not truly be in a game, as was the case in round five, when Ablett is supposively the best player on the ground, *cough* gets thirtyfive plus meaningless possessions and has limited impact on the game (as noted by his coach).
The difference between Carlton with and without Chris Judd is leaps and bounds. Watch Carlton Vs Essendon. No Judd, no Carlton. He comes back and we go on to win three of four. Sure, Adelaide wasn't the 'guaranteed loss' most people would have marked down at the start of the season but we beat the two Grand Finalists of a year ago sandwiched between a poor performance against a team that is playing the best football in the AFL by a fair margin (despite Fremantle possessing the same record) and have won three consecutive games by near 10 goal margins.
In essence, they're two completely different players. However successful Geelong has been these past few years little of it on the big stage can attributed to Ablett. What success Carlton has had can be directly attributed to Judd's leadership.
My question was regarding whether Carlton fans realise that his disposal is not up to scratch. He was never elite by foot but i reckon his skill level has dropped even further in the last 2 years. I was wondering what Carlton fans views where regarding this?
Chris Judd's disposal is suspect. I've written as such that I realize that his disposal often lets him down. However, he is still one of the most damaging players in the game.
The way that he takes the bull by the horns and the way in which he gets possesion of the football sets an example to all of his team-mates.
He doesn't need thirty five possessions for it to be considered a good game, unlike Geelong's Brownlow medallist. Truth be known, even Thompson realizes that Ablett racks up a boat load of soft possessions week in week out.
Judd may have 10 or so less possessions but his impact on the game of football is so much greater than Ablett's, who if it weren't for the likes of Bartel, Ling, Chapman and Selwood would be viewed as nothing more than another ball loving fairy.
The media and fans of teams have a tendency to take a look towards the statistics and base that as their sole judgment on who has played well.
In my opinion, Bartel and Chapman won the Grand Final for you last year. Bartel was on fire early in the game and was winning his own possession. However, he was asked to move into a tagging role and shut down his opponent while winning the ball himself (though not at the level that he had accumulated them earlier in the game) and Chapman led the goal kicking.
The difference between Chris Judd and Gary Ablett is leaps and bounds. Geelong have proven that they can win without Ablett. They have also proven that they can lose and not truly be in a game, as was the case in round five, when Ablett is supposively the best player on the ground, *cough* gets thirtyfive plus meaningless possessions and has limited impact on the game (as noted by his coach).
The difference between Carlton with and without Chris Judd is leaps and bounds. Watch Carlton Vs Essendon. No Judd, no Carlton. He comes back and we go on to win three of four. Sure, Adelaide wasn't the 'guaranteed loss' most people would have marked down at the start of the season but we beat the two Grand Finalists of a year ago sandwiched between a poor performance against a team that is playing the best football in the AFL by a fair margin (despite Fremantle possessing the same record) and have won three consecutive games by near 10 goal margins.
In essence, they're two completely different players. However successful Geelong has been these past few years little of it on the big stage can attributed to Ablett. What success Carlton has had can be directly attributed to Judd's leadership.







