Remove this Banner Ad

Asia Churchill's Holocaust

  • Thread starter Thread starter SullaBC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

SullaBC

Rookie
Joined
Nov 10, 2015
Posts
32
Reaction score
29
AFL Club
St Kilda
Bengal Famine Of 1943 - A Man-Made Holocaust
famine.jpg

At least 3 million people died from starvation and malnutrition during a famine in the Indian province of Bengal in 1943.Reuters
When British Prime Minister David Cameron expressed regret this week for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre of 1919 in Amritsar (in which at least 400 unarmed Indian men, women and children were massacred by British soldiers), he omitted any reference to Britain’s role in a far greater tragedy of colonial India: the Bengal famine of 1943.

Seventy years ago, at least 3 million people died from starvation and malnutrition during a famine in the Indian province of Bengal -- a partly man-made disaster that has been largely forgotten by the world beyond northeastern India.

A complex confluence of malign factors led to the catastrophe, which occurred with the world at war, including, as Indian parliamentary member and leading agricultural scientist M. S. Swaminathan cited in the Hindu newspaper, the Japanese occupation of neighboring Burma and damage to the local rice crop due to tidal waves and a fungal disease epidemic.

Swaminathan also blamed “panic purchase and hoarding by the rich, failure of governance, particularly in relation to the equitable distribution of the available food grains, disruption of communication due to World War II and the indifference of the then UK government to the plight of the starving people of undivided Bengal.”

But while famines were not uncommon in India throughout history, largely because of periodic droughts or monsoons, the tragedy in Bengal had the unmistakable hand of man in it, making it an even greater calamity of recent global history.

In the prior year, 1942, when Japan seized Burma, an important rice exporter, the British bought up massive amounts of rice but hoarded it. The famine only ended because Bengal thankfully delivered a strong rice harvest by 1944.

Dr. Gideon Polya, an Australian biochemist, has called the Bengal famine a man-made “holocaust.”

“The British brought an unsympathetic and ruthless economic agenda to India,” he wrote.

Polya further noted that the “loss of rice from Burma and ineffective government controls on hoarding and profiteering led inevitably to enormous price rises. Thus it can be estimated that the price of rice in Dacca (East Bengal) increased about four-fold in the period from March to October 1943. Bengalis having to purchase food (e.g landless laborers) suffered immensely. Thus, it is estimated that about 30 percent of one particular laborer class died in the famine.”

Many observers in both modern India and Great Britain blame Winston Churchill, Britain's inspiring wartime leader at the time, for the devastation wrought by the famine.

In 2010, Bengali author Madhusree Mukherjee wrote a book about the famine called “Churchill's Secret War,” in which she explicitly blamed Churchill for worsening the starvation in Bengal by ordering the diversion of food away from Indians and toward British troops around the world.

Mukherjee’s book described how wheat from Australia (which could have been delivered to starving Indians) was instead transported to British troops in the Mediterranean and the Balkans. Even worse, British colonial authorities (again under Churchill’s leadership) actually turned down offers of food from Canada and the U.S.

http://www.ibtimes.com/bengal-famine-1943-man-made-holocaust-1100525
 
Churchill was very well aware of guys like this. He didn't want to give up India to the Indians. So he starved them. Its only when his generals told him it would take ten divisions to control the place, did he relinquish.

Famous-Mahatma-Gandhi-Peace-Quotes-Wallpapers.jpg
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Churchill did NOT create the Bengal famine, he was not aware of it until it was well underway, it was not his job to micro manage the whole Empire,. the Administration of India and the total lack of reasonable measures with any amount of reasonable for sight should have seeing coming, and while. British Administrators bear most of the Blame, Indian Politicians also failed to act, there was a lot of detail that there was a real problem as the famine developed, and effective action only happen once Wavell arrived, and those in India were very late in making appeals to London.

Yes Churchill was not fond of Indians, and certainly did not plan to gibe them independence and had some pretty racist views, which must have fed into the decision making process, however no one else in the cabinet was advocating nay action either, and the cabinet was badly advised that India was self sufficient (one of Churchill's dodgy since advisors with no real knowledge off India), it was at the height of the Shipping crisis in the atlantic, which meant any action would have reduced British rations or the build up of arms and equipment for the invasion of Europe.

While Churchill was a key decision maker the US was part of the committee that was in charge of shipping allocations, and the US were not committing all their shipping to the war effort.

Most of the Blame for the famine lies with the local authorities whose failures were massive all down line, lack of reasonable measures about food supply in war time in general, lack of measures once burmese race was no longer available, lack of measures to effective manage the food in bengal and lack of effective use of what food there was in India, and the denial of the massive growing problem and very late in seeking assistance in London.

Churchill could not have prevent the famine form claiming millions, he could have made it a priority and reduced the death toll significant and his somewhat racists attitudes no doubt feed into the decision making process, he was badly advised (though he did pick an advisor who had no real knowledge off india) , as could The British administrators who failures where immense and the Indian politicians who pandered to the rich classes rather than having any real concern for the pool.

Saying it was Churchill Holocaust or a deliberate policy is over stating things. Churchill bears much of the blame for failure of the decent response from Britain, but that failure was already after the famine was well under way.

The Famine id pretty well known amongst those with any interest in the history of world war two, is a whole host of various famines and programs throughout ww2 at various stages and the populist pretty skimpy history in most school systems rarely looks in depth as anything other than their particular nations print of view.

like what do most people know about the famine in Greece? which was as bad on a per captia basis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_(Greece)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom