Remove this Banner Ad

Conspiracy Theory Coronavirus #2: Lockdowns

  • Thread starter Thread starter Werewolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Thoughts on COVID-19? (Choose 2 options)

  • It's a naturally occurring virus

    Votes: 15 20.3%
  • It came from a Chinese laboratory

    Votes: 31 41.9%
  • It came from a US/other laboratory

    Votes: 5 6.8%
  • It's dangerous and harsh restrictions are necessary

    Votes: 19 25.7%
  • It's not dangerous enough to warrant harsh restrictions

    Votes: 22 29.7%
  • It's basically another flu, so restrictions are silly

    Votes: 14 18.9%

  • Total voters
    74

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
m3vauzI.jpg



4 not 4% got Bell's Palsy, but they didn't report 6 died before the cut off date of 14th November (it might be more now). 4 deaths were in the "placebo" group but no one has stated what the "placebo" is.

In the Astra Zenica study they're given meningococcal vaccine as a "placebo" (which was also reported to cause a death of a healthy 28 year old Dr in Brazil from meningitis), so it could be that or anthrax, who knows?

Pfizer are reporting the deaths in the vaccine group were from cardiac arrest and arteriosclerosis, which is 2 more than the studies into HCQ (which was said to be unsafe to take because of it's effect on the heart) which had correct doses.

Interesting the allergic reaction that's occurred in two of the health workers in UK given vaccine on the first day, was only one participant out of approx 21,000 was reported to have an allergic reaction. Now there is a warning for anyone with allergies not to take the vaccine because of an anaphylactoid reaction .
 
So 4% got bells palsy
A few deaths already
1/21000 get an allergic reaction bad enough to put the roll out on hold. Results are just as likely to get worse yet as they are improve. They still got no idea what side effects there'll be

This is out of a very small sample size. The virus itself has a large sample size

The virus with greater than 99% survival naturally. Go get the vaccination dummies. Literally more chance of harm than the virus you're scared of.

Inability to understand basic math/probability will kill people. Who'd have thought society would fall so far...
 
So 4% got bells palsy
A few deaths already
1/21000 get an allergic reaction bad enough to put the roll out on hold. Results are just as likely to get worse yet as they are improve. They still got no idea what side effects there'll be

This is out of a very small sample size. The virus itself has a large sample size

The virus with greater than 99% survival naturally. Go get the vaccination dummies. Literally more chance of harm than the virus you're scared of.

Inability to understand basic math/probability will kill people. Who'd have thought society would fall so far...
The stats you have shared above are sourced from MSM. MSM = fake news.
 
So 4% got bells palsy
A few deaths already
1/21000 get an allergic reaction bad enough to put the roll out on hold. Results are just as likely to get worse yet as they are improve. They still got no idea what side effects there'll be

This is out of a very small sample size. The virus itself has a large sample size

The virus with greater than 99% survival naturally. Go get the vaccination dummies. Literally more chance of harm than the virus you're scared of.

Inability to understand basic math/probability will kill people. Who'd have thought society would fall so far...
+ If you're healthy and young the survival rate is near on 100%.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad


I believe that is for serology tests i.e. blood tests.

Most testing is being done via viral ('PCR') testing i.e. swabs from the back of the nose.

Of course those viral tests are a joke because their results are dependent on the settings of the PCR devices in the labs.

That is, the number of cycles of amplification. Set it high enough and every test will claim to have found coronavirus.

The whole thing is a circus. An obvious circus. And a cover for the Great Reset.
 
I believe that is for serology tests i.e. blood tests.

Most testing is being done via viral ('PCR') testing i.e. swabs from the back of the nose.

Of course those viral tests are a joke because their results are dependent on the settings of the PCR devices in the labs.

That is, the number of cycles of amplification. Set it high enough and every test will claim to have found coronavirus.

The whole thing is a circus. An obvious circus. And a cover for the Great Reset.
Spot on.
 
How many people die every day normally
What was the average age of those deaths
What number of people in that age bracket die daily

Your numbers without context are meaningless. But you're so wound up over the new flu you ha e zero perspective...
 
The stats you have shared above are sourced from MSM. MSM = fake news.
No, the stats were from a 92 page Briefing document for CDC. However the 4% was transposed incorrectly in the tweet and should have been 4 cases of Bell's Palsy and they missed the deaths and the bias that any cause of death or serious adverse reaction is decided by employees of Pfizer. They still haven't said what vaccine they're using for the placebo (meningococcal for AZ), to mitigate the difference between vaccine and placebo groups.


The allergic reaction was only mentioned for one person, but there were no immunocompromised, or people with allergic reactions or obese or children or a diverse or elderly population with comorbidities in the subject group so there is only safety data on healthy mainly young people.

Now the UK is investigating and stopping anyone with serious allergies from getting the vaccine.

Pfizer was warned about allergic reactions to the vaccine back in August because of polyethylene glycol (PEG) in COVID mRNA vaccines, which could have caused the severe allergic reactions reported this week by two of the first UK recipients of Pfizer’s vaccine.


Some other interesting facts in the briefing document were that some mouse and primate tests were done, although nothing has been published or peer reviewed. They know, and this has been highlighted by ex Pfizer research VP, that sterility could be a problem with the vaccine. There was a test for pregnancy in a group of mice after being vaccinated, but they are not reporting on it (they say it's still ongoing). However, Pfizer gave a warning to UK doctors that women should not become pregnant within 2 months of the last vaccine and they can't say if the vaccine causes infertility.

It's also important to note they did some trials on primates and as in the Astra Zenica trials, the vaccine did not stop any of the primates from getting COVID. They can only say if the COVID was serious enough for the lungs to be affected, the vaccine made the effect less serious when they autopsied the primates.

So why are they reporting (on 170 cases) that their vaccine's effectiveness is 95%?

That's because the endpoint of the study is to measure and see if the vaccine produced a spike protein, which the body is then expected to produce antibodies against and that is their measure of success. The subjects, except for the primates were not challenged with COVID after being vaccinate to see if they were protected or if they passed it on.

It is these Spike Proteins that also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.

Some subjects did apparently get COVID but this is being challenged as incorrect by pathologist Dr. Sin Hang Lee in a letter to the FDA, because they used a rtPCT test of 44 or above replications which would have produced a positive COVID test, even if the subject has a slight cold.

 

Remove this Banner Ad

9/11, 2,977 people were killed

Yesterday it was 3,260 from CV19
Is this USA? The deep-state John Hopkins University has published research (posted here by me) that show there are no more deaths in the US (projected for the reset of 2020) this year that there have been in any of the previous 4 years.

However JH show that there has been a reclassification of heart attacks, cancers, pneumonia and other causes to COVID. It's slight of hand, propaganda supported by most of the media and confirmed by many high level doctors around the world that a fraud is being perpetrated on the world's population.
 
Check out the US CDC's weekly reports for Covid19 (and pneumonia/influenza) deaths.
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/weeklyarchives2020-2021/data/NCHSData48.csv
(NB: You can change the link I have provided to see previous weeks as they were reported and archived ... eg. change ...NCHSData48 to NCHSData10 to see what the report looked like back in March).

Below is a snippet of some of the data from that weekly report;
CDC pic.PNG

If you download the file and look at previous years (pre-covid19) reporting of deaths, you will be able to see where deaths are recorded as either pneumonia or influenza but a death was not put in both. Or at the very least the PIC column was always equal to Pneumonia + Influenza deaths.
Now with Covid19, they are recording a large chunk of deaths in both Pneumonia and Covid19 columns.
That is, the combined total of Pneumonia + Influenza + Covid19 columns for 2020 so far = 525,626 Deaths.
Yet the total for the PIC column is 410,034. That means some 115,592 recorded Covid19 deaths have also been recorded as Pneumonia or Influenza aswell. To explain that better using the image provided, add the 3 yellow values and you get 8,462 recorded deaths, yet just 6,584 (green) for PIC (which in previous years was representative of Pneumonia+Influenza).

(NB: these CDC reported Covid19 death numbers 250,873 ending week 48, seem to trail other reported stats available on the internet. This is why recent week tallies will look low. From my analysis, CDC seem to add to these totals even years later ... why? who am I to know.)
 
Last edited:
Are people really 'that' against population control?

Personally, yes. Just too much of a slippery slope on a human rights basis. I wouldn't support making people sterile or forced abortions. Would much rather curb consumption.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

No, the stats were from a 92 page Briefing document for CDC. However the 4% was transposed incorrectly in the tweet and should have been 4 cases of Bell's Palsy and they missed the deaths and the bias that any cause of death or serious adverse reaction is decided by employees of Pfizer. They still haven't said what vaccine they're using for the placebo (meningococcal for AZ), to mitigate the difference between vaccine and placebo groups.


The allergic reaction was only mentioned for one person, but there were no immunocompromised, or people with allergic reactions or obese or children or a diverse or elderly population with comorbidities in the subject group so there is only safety data on healthy mainly young people.

Now the UK is investigating and stopping anyone with serious allergies from getting the vaccine.

Pfizer was warned about allergic reactions to the vaccine back in August because of polyethylene glycol (PEG) in COVID mRNA vaccines, which could have caused the severe allergic reactions reported this week by two of the first UK recipients of Pfizer’s vaccine.


Some other interesting facts in the briefing document were that some mouse and primate tests were done, although nothing has been published or peer reviewed. They know, and this has been highlighted by ex Pfizer research VP, that sterility could be a problem with the vaccine. There was a test for pregnancy in a group of mice after being vaccinated, but they are not reporting on it (they say it's still ongoing). However, Pfizer gave a warning to UK doctors that women should not become pregnant within 2 months of the last vaccine and they can't say if the vaccine causes infertility.

It's also important to note they did some trials on primates and as in the Astra Zenica trials, the vaccine did not stop any of the primates from getting COVID. They can only say if the COVID was serious enough for the lungs to be affected, the vaccine made the effect less serious when they autopsied the primates.

So why are they reporting (on 170 cases) that their vaccine's effectiveness is 95%?

That's because the endpoint of the study is to measure and see if the vaccine produced a spike protein, which the body is then expected to produce antibodies against and that is their measure of success. The subjects, except for the primates were not challenged with COVID after being vaccinate to see if they were protected or if they passed it on.

It is these Spike Proteins that also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.

Some subjects did apparently get COVID but this is being challenged as incorrect by pathologist Dr. Sin Hang Lee in a letter to the FDA, because they used a rtPCT test of 44 or above replications which would have produced a positive COVID test, even if the subject has a slight cold.

Thanks for taking the time to post this opinion. And thanks for providing sources, no matter how dubious (something that might get you into trouble on the conspiracies board). The use of emotive language in the source you provided should trigger more warning bells than the claims they are asserting.
 
Do we know the average age of all "Covid" deaths world wide mj?
[/QUOTE/]

Massachusetts population is similar to Victoria and average age of death is over 82 years of age.

Many of these deaths had Pre existing conditions. Average life expectancy is
80 and 8 months in Massachusetts.


I’m sure if looked all over America County’s and States the stats be very similar.

This is a conspiracy to shut down businesses and shutdown cities etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom