Remove this Banner Ad

Conspiracy Theory Coronavirus #2: Lockdowns

  • Thread starter Thread starter Werewolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Thoughts on COVID-19? (Choose 2 options)

  • It's a naturally occurring virus

    Votes: 15 20.3%
  • It came from a Chinese laboratory

    Votes: 31 41.9%
  • It came from a US/other laboratory

    Votes: 5 6.8%
  • It's dangerous and harsh restrictions are necessary

    Votes: 19 25.7%
  • It's not dangerous enough to warrant harsh restrictions

    Votes: 22 29.7%
  • It's basically another flu, so restrictions are silly

    Votes: 14 18.9%

  • Total voters
    74

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Seriously your standards have dropped to embarrassing lows.
I had the time initially to read and understand your posts.
Its not a cool way of looking at it, periods, cars, dude you've slipped to the gutter critics level.

Lift your game!.

inspirational Coach - thanks

If we had a running commentary on every lethal adverse reaction from a drug or medical procedure we’d have the same paranoia being created here over the Vaccines.

Perspective is what’s needed not hysteria.
 
inspirational Coach - thanks

If we had a running commentary on every lethal adverse reaction from a drug or medical procedure we’d have the same paranoia being created here over the Vaccines.

Perspective is what’s needed not hysteria.
Agreed with viruses
 
Dr Michael Yeadon, ex Pfizer VP and Chief Scientist and 32 years in Global Research and Development of therapeutics and vaccines, with expert explanation on the difference between the experimental mRNA injections and normal vaccines and the particular problems with all gene based spike protein vaccines.

They couldn't ignore or look the other way with under 50s thrombosis having a direct link to the injections, but strongly suspects older patients are also dying with the same problems.

He states the safe and effective therapeutics like HCQ, IVM have been suppressed or not recommended because the big pharmaceutical companies would not have got emergency authorisation for their injections, if they had been made available.

Very concerned with children's studies and unethical pressure put on young people, pregnant women and potentially children to get the injections.

He's asked some philosophical questions that I haven't heard him answer before, that he's had a chance over the last year to think about which is interesting.

Asked about Dr Cahill's claims that the mRNA injections will cause more harm in a few years. Doesn't agree or disagree, because we don't know as the studies have not been completed. Thinks Cahill is giving her honest opinion and is not wrong to point out the peculiar situation where ADE has occurred in pervious studies.

Concerned about variants coming from COVID injections, as whatever is in the injections has not been properly disclosed by the manufacturing companies.

What can we do as we seem to be heading towards a biosecurity state? In the UK if you're under 60 or 70 you are at a greater risk of dying from flu than COVID, so don't take the COVID injections as it will lead to the vaccine passport. From there any variations could be put into0 the injections and you'll continually have to get injections to function in society.

 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

No idea what I'm doing yet re the vaccine but for curiosity. Say for example, you don't get the vaccine and you want to go to a birthday party with all your close friends and it's in a closed space. You know that at least out of the forty there, ten of them have covid.

What do you do? Do you stay away or do you go and take some precautions, mask, keeping some distance etc, or do you go and be hugging on everybody there?

Why are these ten people at a party if they are sick?
 
inspirational Coach - thanks

If we had a running commentary on every lethal adverse reaction from a drug or medical procedure we’d have the same paranoia being created here over the Vaccines.

Perspective is what’s needed not hysteria.
I don't see paranoia, I see genuine concern, it has been concern from the beginning.
The people on this thread aren't fooled by the titalating spin the world health(or lack of health)organisations are putting on this jab. Adding the people on this thread aren't fooled by the fear campaigns that have been established to control the population.

So tell me who are really the paranoid or hysterical, pretty evident now isnt it.
 
I don't see paranoia, I see genuine concern, it has been concern from the beginning.
The people on this thread aren't fooled by the titalating spin the world health(or lack of health)organisations are putting on this jab. Adding the people on this thread aren't fooled by the fear campaigns that have been established to control the population.

So tell me who are really the paranoid or hysterical, pretty evident now isnt it.

who is trying to control the population?
And why?
 
who is trying to control the population?
And why?
SAGE (Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies)
I mean these guys are so egocentric their acronym stands for a wise person.
With every statement they have made regarding covid variations, all information has been unfounded and the severity is no more than the original strain. This is all to fear a public to control them.
The irony is the public dont even believe the truth, that they have been controlled to conform.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

SAGE (Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies)
I mean these guys are so egocentric their acronym stands for a wise person.
With every statement they have made regarding covid variations, all information has been unfounded and the severity is no more than the original strain. This is all to fear a public to control them.
The irony is the public dont even believe the truth, that they have been controlled to conform.

why is this SAGE group wanting to control the public - what do they gain?
 
1618556442577-png.1103943
 
Do you know what the risk of death from Covid is if you're a healthy child or adult under 50?

We f...ed this up from the start, once it was known that Covid was not the armageddon we were lead to believe we should have adjusted and thrown support behind those at significant risk and left those at miniscule risk get on with their lives.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Do you know what the risk of death from Covid is if you're a healthy child or adult under 50?

We f...ed this up from the start, once it was known that Covid was not the armageddon we were lead to believe we should have adjusted and thrown support behind those at significant risk and left those at miniscule risk get on with their lives.
It hasnt been in Australia so far
but
Quite a few countries back in lockdown because its surging again
Indias infection rate is going off, they went from a vax exporter to a vax importer
Wouldnt want to be in Brazil
 
If no post mortems have been done in the last 12+ months .
No post mortems done because it serves as a unnecessary risk to medical staff.
Tell me how did they come to the figure of 16.5% ?
Was it another estimation?
You dont do post mortems on everyone who has blood clots and doesnt die
 
It hasnt been in Australia so far
but
Quite a few countries back in lockdown because its surging again
Indias infection rate is going off, they went from a vax exporter to a vax importer
Wouldnt want to be in Brazil
So the original lockdowns didn't work.

Infection/cases mean jack shit, the vast majority of them would be asymptomatic or mild.

Exactly, we are not Brazil or England, Spain, Greece or Mongolia. We adjust to our conditions, it's not a one size fits all global solution.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom